The Giver Dystopia Essay

In the novel The Giver by Lois Lowry, the receivers are the only people who have feelings and memories. The elders are the people who choose what the best is for their people in the community and sometimes they go to the receiver for help on making the right decisions. The people from the community do not see color, or have freedom on making a decision for them. There is no love, feelings, and grandparents. Jonas is assigned to be the next receiver of the community; He was trained by the giver, who transfers memories of the pain and pleasures of life, who also shows him the truth and reality that is hidden to the community. Jonas’s community does not represent the ideal of society because there are no choices or distinctions between men

“’Memories are forever”’ (Lowry). People make new memories every day without even realizing it. Some good some bad, that’s just the way of life, but in The Giver nobody knows what happened before them. People barley remember what their childhood was like, they don’t understand the importance of memory and that memories are forever. Aspects of life, rules, and prosperities between our world and Jonas’ world are very different yet have some similarities. Things that are crucial to the characters in The Giver are not as meaningful to the people in our world.

Jonas’ community appears to be a utopia, but, in reality, it is a dystopia. The people seem perfectly content to live in an isolated wreck—in a government run by a select few—in which a group of Elders enforces the rules. In Jonas’ community, there is no poverty, starvation, unemployment, lack of housing, or discrimination; everything is perfectly planned to eliminate any problems. However, as the book progresses and Jonas gains insight into what the people have willingly given up—their freedoms and individualities—for the so-called common good of the community, it becomes more and more obvious that the community is a horrible place in which to live. You as a reader can relate to the disbelief and horror that Jonas feels when he realizes

Jonas had so many questions about what happened to the people in community, but he wanted to learn more things about music and holidays also. Jonas and Gabriel got to stay in the house with the family and The Giver until Spring. He learned a lot about the holidays and music over the winter. In the Spring the three took off not knowing what direction they were going in. They were heading back to their old community. When they made it to the community they finally got to see what the memories had done. There were no more family units where no one loved each other. Instead there were real families with marriage and having their own kids. People were able to choose their own jobs and do what they wanted to do. The Giver wanted to stay in the community now that is was a much better place to live now and so did Jonas. Gabriel didn’t recognize the place very well due to him being very young and being gone for so long. So Jonas, Gabriel and The Giver managed to stay in the community again and they were able to live a normal life with no elders and no ceremonies it was like a normal place like the place they had gone in the winter

     This book is about a boy names Jonas. Jonas lives in a futuristic society where there is no pain, fear, war, and hatred. There is also no prejudice, since everyone looks and acts basically the same, there is very little competition. They have also eliminated choice.

The Giver is considered as a dystopian society because everyone is under the illusion that there is freedom. An example of this is when the text states, “you're ready for the pills, that's all. That’s the treatment for the stirrings.” They can't even have independent thoughts. Medication is given to prevent

The Giver describes a society in search of perfection, which is a recurring theme in literature. Somebody in Jonas’s society decided that eliminating or limiting choices and feeling, among other things, would ultimately create a perfect place in which to live. By eliminating and/or limiting choices and feelings, the creators were able to implement Sameness, which would then provide a conflict-less environment in which to exist.

A true utopia requires sacrifices many people cannot condone. This fact has been shown throughout The Giver. The community decides to sacrifice many things to come to Sameness. Pain, individuality and love are among many things that they have sacrificed (Lowry 124). These sacrifices made the community Jonas lived in seemingly perfect; there is no hunger, no war, no pain, no one will ever be alone. But, a perfect community is completely unrealistic. That is why they have The Giver, the person that knows all the imperfections of the society and help the society to achieve perfection.

In the Giver, the community that Jonas lives in is free of violence, poverty, prejudices, pain, and feelings; but they have no freedom. The society trades their choices to be free of violence. The people don’t know any better. I believe that living in a society that has no freedom and no pain is not better than a society where the people have freedom and pain.

First, The Giver’s community is a dystopia because there is limited freedom. I know this because in the Document E it says, “Oh,” Jonas was silent for a minute. “Oh, I

A utopian society is to be though of perfect or idealistic. The charcters in the book have no feelings, no choices, and no memories other thhan their own life. The Giver and Jonas are the only two with memories since their job is to be the holder of them and Jonas stops taking his medication to no longer interfearing with his body that gives him feelings. All others do not have any emotional attachments. The community decides all of your life’s plan. They choose your spose, your career, and you are not able to have your own children. If you want children you have to apply and a child will be given to you if you are accepted. The Giver and Jonas are the only ones with memories from the past that go back hundreds before the community was a utopian societ and other communities and how they live. The only memories the people in the community are allowed to have are their own lives but thneir lives are controlled by the committee of elders. This give the people of the community teh benefit of never feeling pain but they have no freedom which is almost as if they live in a comunity with a dictatorship.

Would the community in THE GIVER be considerd a dystopia or utopia? Many people would choose dystopia because it is a community of samnes. They would also choose it as a utpia because it is a community of samness.They would also choose it a dystopia because they choose your spouse and kids.Second they erase there a memory and last but not least sameness no one knows love or pain is .They cant understand why jonas gets upset when they were playing the war game.choosing there spouse is a dystopia because you only get two kids and and you get assighned your husband.The thing were they erased there memories is a real crazy way to make sameness. What this means is that they dont know if they have beem loved or not. This is also a hard way for

The Giver by Lois Lowry is a Utopia because no one is ever starving, no one really feels pain, and they can’t choose wrong. Throughout our world I have seen many people on the sides of streets having no food, no home, and no family with no one helping them to have a better life. I have also seen people helping the homeless and shelters but in this book they don’t need to do that because everybody already has a home and food. Plus they don’t have to ask for money and food, they already have it.

Would the community in the giver be a utopia or a dystopia. A dystopia is a pretty place on the outside, but not on the inside.The community presented in THE GIVER can be considered a dystopia because of control,sameness, and surveillance.

I would not want to live in the society of The Giver one reason is that Nothing would be the same. “He stared at the flat colorless sky” pg 101 living in a world with no color is like us living in a world with no numbers it would be strange! “you and I are the only ones with access to the books?” It would also be odd without books because books are a key part of learning pg 96 “I apologize for hurting you.” pg 96 I feel this explains my reasoning due to people would be hurt all the time and if we would be ordered to apologize for everything, we would always need to say that all the time!