The Golden Balls game is very similar to the prisoners dilemma because there will always be an incentive to act in a way that benefits yourself, on your opponents expense. And when both players choose to cheat, they will both be worse off than they would have been if they engaged in cooperative behaviour. Just like with Thelma and Louise, both players can choose between cooperating, and depending on the other players actions, split the payoff 50/50 or getting nothing, or engaging in non-cooperative behaviour and again depending on the other players actions, getting 100% of the payoff or nothing. The only difference is that in the prisoners dilemma, they players are not allowed to communicate with each other. In the Golden Balls game however, …show more content…
So whether you change your decision or not, you will still end up with nothing.
I believe that the man in the first video was naive to think that the girl would choose to split after he had cheated in the previous round. In a prisoners dilemma type of game, where there are many rounds, he should have expected that the player would choose to engage in strategic behaviour like the tit for tat strategy. He knew from the beginning that there would be several rounds; therefore he should have kept his opponents future actions in mind before he chose his actions in the previous rounds. Because he has a history of engaging in non-cooperative behaviour, there is no incentive for player 2 to cooperate in the next round again. Another problem with his strategy is that when you tell your opponent convincingly that you will split, you are also telling them that they don’t have to worry about you choosing to steal, and therefore the opponent will have an even greater incentive to choose steal and get 100% of the payoff. And if it turns out player1 also decided to cheat — at least your won’t look like a fool all over again. Choosing to steal would therefor be the obvious choice for player2. Player2 made the right decision when choosing the steal ball. It would not be smart
The Westing Game is about a group of heirs trying to find the murderer of Sam Westing. The Westing Game by Ellen Raskin contains many clues and mysteries that are worth millions of dollars. Gull Lake Middle School has read the book and watched the movie about TWG. The goal of The Westing Game is to win.
I have never seen such ambitiousness and hope, I was amazed how strong everyone in the video were, not just Arthur and William ,but also their family and friends. Such attitude and hard work is what we real need to be successful. There were so many obstacles that were in both of the players yet they fought for what they love and their goals. The Hoop Dreams show how our system is set to only benefit those who have the money not those who have the dream and the skills. If william and Arthur had a stable financial, their life would have been so much easier to make it to the professional level. There are many issues that these two athletes faced in young aged, money, family issues, struggles in school are the common issues both Arthur Agee and William Gates faced.
Who killed Sam Westing? Students in Gull Lake Middle School read and watched the westing game novel and movie. The Westing Game novel and movie contains many similarities and differences that are worth exploring. In the general story of the Westing Game the novel was about the characters getting helped by their partners. Also about winning the Westing game estate.
The conversation seems to be framed in a win-lose orientation to conflict. Each person wants to be right, and to win at the expense of the other. How can Jan and Ken move their conflict discussion into a win-win orientation?
“ ‘Cheer up my friend, the game’s not over. You can still win. I hope you do. ’Those were the last words Sandy had said to her” (Raskin pg.185). The Westing Game by Ellen Raskin is about a game that if you win, you get 200 million dollars. This book is filled with mystery and adventure. The Westing Game movie is more exciting than the book and is also filled with mystery. The Westing Game book and movie contain many similarities and differences that are worth 200 million dollars.
“Sometimes the easiest way to solve a problem is to stop participating in the problem”
In addition to the fight, the boys are once again thrown together to grab all the coins that they can. More concerned with doing what they are told and seizing the coins than pain they experience,
When watching the movie "Nell" starring Jodie Foster and Liam Nelson, the viewers are in for quite a surprise when they see the young girl in the film. The movie was made in 1994 so it is a pretty old movie but still has very good quality. In "Nell" a young girl is secluded in the woods while she lived with her mother. When a young boy was delivering groceries, he discovered that the mother had passed away and that is when police and a doctor found a young girl living there. She seemed to have something wrong with her and was frightened by other people like she had never seen anyone else except her mother. She had a severe speech impediment and she was very hard to understand. The doctor "Jerry" took the time to figure out what was wrong with her and he came to find out that she used to have a twin sister and they had a unique language of their own.
When you turn on the tv on a typical March day what’s usually what you see on ESPN and other major sport news channels? Give you a hint NCAA Basketball. The NCAA is a multi-Billion dollar “Industry” that gets a lot of attentions of its fans. The other side of the coin in the NCAA is not as happy as it seems like when someone wins a National Title. Many Players devote their time to be there, some without any resources just hard work and just hope of making it pro and having a Multi-million dollar contract to not only play the sport they love but to have the money they need to have a house to live, food to eat, and everything possible needed to live a life. NCAA managers make millions and while the athletes get scholarships, sometimes that’s
In this paper, I will write about “Thelma and Louise” (1991) movie. I choose a last scene of the movie which the police came to arrest them in the Grand Canyon (from 122 to 125 minutes).
If you constantly split the difference or “straddle the fence,” game playing can result and the outcome could be less than ideal.
There are three basic elements in which one can find in any game show (game theory) and those three basic elements are “the players, the strategies available to each player, and the payoffs each player receives for each possible combination of strategies” (Frank, Bernanke, and Johnston 252). The game show known as Golden Balls is no different because one can see the players, strategies and outcome in the game. Golden Balls involves decision making and can be looked at in an economic perspective because economics is decision making.
I only used the tactics that I was familiar with and I had no awareness of using other tactics such as avoidance. Before the activity, I assumed that I could spend a large amount of time trying to persuade the opponent to agree to the desired outcomes, however, the manager in the first round was direct
The Collaborating tactic may be used when your whole objective on the conflict is to learn. Also it is a good idea to use the Collaborating tactic when you want to work through feeling that have interfered with the relationship with the other person in the conflict. Competing tactic is excellent when you want to cut the through all of the non sense and get to a resolution of the conflict quickly. When quick decisive resolutions are very important, or when people attempt to disagree with you and your right without a doubt. The last tactic that Rahim and Magner talk about is the Compromising tactic. This is good for when, goals are important to you but they are not worth all the trouble they may cause. To achieve rather quick and easy resolutions to rather complex disagreements
The Prisoner’s Dilemma is an extremely popular game and way of thinking about social interactions and also economics. It judges how people work together and against each other. It helps us understand what governs the balance between cooperation and competition in business, in politics, and in social settings. The two players in the game can choose between two moves, either 'cooperate' or 'defect'. The idea is that each player gains when both cooperate, but if only one of them cooperates, the other one, who defects, will gain more. If both defect, both lose. The whole game situation and its different outcomes can be summarised with the example provided below, hypothetical situations are imagined with the example below