The Gospels Research Paper

The gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were the recounting of the teachings of Jesus and were preached in many regions that had been conquered by Rome. The gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were the recounting of the teachings of Jesus and were preached in many regions that had been conquered by Rome. The gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were the recounting of the teachings of Jesus and were preached in many regions that had been conquered by Rome. The gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John which were written in Greek, were the recounting of the teachings of Jesus and were preached in many regions that had been conquered by Rome.

“The Church has always and everywhere maintained, and continues to maintain, the apostolic origin of the four Gospels. The apostles preached, as Christ had charged them to do, and then, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, they and others of the apostolic age handed on to us in writing the same message they had preached, the

In the New Testament, the main figure Jesus Christ brings us the definitive truth about divine Revelation. In the New Testament the four Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, the main witnesses to the life and teaching of Jesus, forms the heart of all writings and occupy a unique place in Church. It is a collection of 27 Books written in less than 100 years (51 to 105 A.D.) after Christ as a Missionary Handbook. In which proclaims the birth, growth and teachings of the Christian Church. The New Testament is a record of historical events, the ‘good news’ events of the saving life of the Lord Jesus Christ, His life, death, resurrection, ascension and how his work is continued in the world. This overall is explain and asserted by the apostles

In the early days of the church, there were four original gospels, the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. It is estimated that the four gospels were written around 50 to 100 A.D., making them the earliest and first record of Jesus’s life ever recorded. All four gospels were either written by or under the supervision of an apostle, a person who followed Jesus during his travels. Meanwhile, other false, fictitious gospels were written hundreds of years

When we open the New Testament, we find four books called "gospels" - Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. All four present compelling accounts of the life, ministry, death and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth, the long-awaited Jewish Messiah (the Christ) and Son of God.

Gospel is an old English word meaning “good news.” When comparing the four gospels they are all unified, but each gospel can have slight differences to them. Whether is literary structure, length, how many teachings, important events, different significance, geography or chronology; they all are correlated to tell us Jesus’ story, in their own way. In like manner, God didn’t give us one explanation from an confined individual. Rather, God educates us about the broad richness of Jesus’ life through a numerous prophet-witnesses. Moreover, God works through well-documented and a valid history, not through confidential revelations to a single person. The prophetic witnesses of the Gospels endorse the truth that God himself is speaking. Each Gospel

Apocryphal Gospels “...are those which the Church did not accept as part of the genuine apostolic tradition, even though they themselves claim to have been written by one of the apostles” ("What Are the Canonical and the Apocryphal Gospels? How Many Are There?"). The word “apocryphal” originally was translated to mean “secret” and would later become to mean “heretical”. Apocryphal writings started very early in the history of the church with their main purpose serving to fill in the early details of Jesus’ life that had not been provided in the other gospels. While there is no exact number for how many Apocryphal Gospels exist, it is known that the number possibly exceeds fifty ("What Are the Canonical and the Apocryphal Gospels? How Many Are There?").

There are four gospels and the authors who wrote them are: Mark, Luke, Matthew, and John. The ways that the gospels are different are, they all have different angels, the four gospels have given details over Christ’s life and Ministry. Each author is presenting different parts of aspects of Jesus’ Character. We need these four gospels because each gospel has different information that the other gospels don’t have. They have different answers and perspectives and that’s why we have four different gospels that tell us different angels over the life of Christ.

Matthew, Mark, and Luke were inserted into the Canon as they each gave several accurate stories of Jesus’ life (Strobel, 1998). Matthew focuses on the background and historic setting of Jesus’ time before transferring over to the teachings of Jesus. This format allows for Christians to have a quick, historical based introduction to Jesus before the author includes significant moments such as the Parable on the Mount and the Great Commission. The first Gospel targeted Jews and tried to convince God’s people that Jesus was the Messiah. Mark offers little introduction and almost immediately by jumping into the description and events of Jesus’ ministry. This book earned its spot in the Bible by addressing the persecution Christian people will face. Luke targeted the Gentiles of the Christian faith and by using Jesus’ teachings, the author tried to convince people that Gentiles hold an important role in the spread of the Christian faith. The last Gospel, John, approaches the writing much differently. John provides more of the facts and signs that Christians may use in a more statistical approach to the story of Jesus (Walvoord, 1983). For several hundred years, the Canon of the Bible developed and the Church leaders eventually settled on the four Gospels known now, to help represent

There is an undeniable simplicity when reading through the bible. Most concepts, ideas and statements are so simple that children often find it easier to understand than most adults and most believe this was by design than happenstance. To prove this you can randomly open your bible, begin reading a single or multiple verses and generally find the thoughts of God intriguing no matter how uneducated you are. This simplicity allows almost everyone who reads the bible to conclude that Jesus Christ was born from a virgin, taught and preached throughout Judea, was crucified, raised from the dead on the 3rd day and ascended back into heaven. This to most is the broad goal or scope of the Gospels. To spread the message of hope through Jesus Christ throughout the four-corners of the world.

As we all know, there are four gospels; Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. All are different, interesting, and each tells us stories about Jesus, and yet three of the four are very similar.

The four gospels of the Bible (Matthew, Mark, Luke, & John) are constantly being criticized for their reliability. Many individuals argue that they are legends/myths instead of historical events. They point out that there are alleged contradictions and that the Gospels were written centuries after the lifetimes of the eyewitnesses. The challenge for people on the rebutting side, is to give enough substantial evidence to prove their reliability.

The word "gospel" is a translation of the Greek word "euangelion" which means "good news. The first three books in the New Testament (Mark, Matthew, and Luke) are often referred to as the Synoptic Gospels (from Greek synoptikos, "seen together") They bear greater similarity to each other than any of the other gospels in the New Testament. Along with these similarities come some differences among the gospels, suggesting that each gospel was written for a specific audience and for a specific purpose. This paper will examine the resurrection of Jesus, while identifying the significant differences between Mark, Matthew and Luke. This paper will also analyze the differences to suggest the prominent theological perspective each gospel author

When you first open the New Testament, the four canonical gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, are placed first. These gospels have been accepted as the synoptic history of Jesus’ birth, life, death, and resurrection-- and traditionally regarded as a reliable biography on Jesus by most Christians. However, when we take a closer look at the synoptic gospels and the conflicting (and similar) narratives, we begin to see that these gospels may not be the accurate and reliable source of historicity that many of us have been taught to believe in bible study. Taking a small section of verses from Matthew, Mark, and Luke regarding the healing of the blind man/men near Jericho, we will be able to dissect the material from each gospel appropriately--

A lot about the gospels remains unknown to scholars. But the similarities help understand what texts were available to who. The “two-source hypothesis” already depicts and early Christianity where some gospels, such as the Gospel of Mark and the ‘Q’ scroll were easily accessible to enough people that the other synoptic gospels could be based on them. There may be many similarities in the gospels that help pin together the life and death of Jesus, but many of the differences prevent a crystal clear