The Government Invasion Of Privacy

Whether it is calling someone on your phone or online shopping on the computer, people are more connected than ever to the internet. However, a person might be oblivious to the fact that they are being watched using these technologies. The NSA (National Security Agency) is an intelligence organization for the U.S. to protect information systems and foreign intelligence information. Recently the NSA has been accused of invading personal privacy through web encryption, tracking, and using personal information for their own uses and without permission. The surveillance of the NSA produces unlawful invasion of privacy causing an unsecure nation.

Privacy is a natural right that needs to be kept because if it is not a free society cannot function as one. If we give up our total privacy, we give up our freedom, which in essence throws away our liberal society. Every individual enjoys the act of being alone because it allows him or her to be themselves without facing any type of judgment. Every individual would cringe at the thought of being watched at all hours, while eating, sleeping, communicating, or participating in another activity. I would would feel embarrassed and petrified to know that every time I took a shower I was being watched. Everyone enjoys his or her right to privacy in America. In my opinion, the government has no right to invade our privacy because not everyone is a criminal and gather all this information

Every day, the government believes it is acceptable to continue invading and searching our personal e-mails, messages, accounts, etc. Although they have the authority as a government, they do not have the right to invade our privacy as the 4th amendment states “The right of the people to be secure in

Privacy is defined by Dictionary.com as “freedom from damaging publicity, public scrutiny, secret surveillance, or unauthorized disclosure of one’s personal data or information”. This is something that most people value extremely highly. From everyday civilians to government officials, everybody wants some level of privacy. Many say surveillance technology denies them the right to privacy that they are given at birth as American citizens. However, there should be a small amount of wiggle room when it comes to this technology, in order to protect the country and its people. In “Visible Man: Ethics in a World without Secrets”, Peter Singer gives us an insight into privacy in the government. He discusses the

We’ve all heard the conspiracy theories. Alien aircrafts are kept in Area 51. Obama can control the weather. Neil Armstrong never landed on the moon. Some people see these theories as a product of irrationality but they’re really a product of fear. Ever since 9/11, Americans have been desperately searching for a sense of security within the country that was taken from us. We’ve been so desperate in fact that we’ve given up some of our basic rights in order to restore that sense of security. When you walk through a metal detector at an airport and they scan you for any metal items, would you consider that an invasion of your privacy? Would you sacrifice that privacy to feel safer on an airplane? Most of us would because when the choice is life or death, the decision becomes a lot simpler.

The internet is full of atrocious, inappropriate, and dangerous content. Some of examples of this would be ""porn, identity thefts, and cyber-bulling"". (Debate) Child pornography is a major issue and is not acceptable. This a reason why the government would monitor our internet content and this is an understandable reason for invading privacy. Another current issue today would be Human Trafficking. Invading our privacy to search for this issue would be understandable as well. I do not believe the government just wants to spy on what we are looking at, I believe they are looking out for our greater

The NSA has also started controlling their own agency, that is until Snowden leaked the classified documents. “Obama, however, lost interest in controlling his intelligence agencies until Edward Snowden let the American public know what they were doing.” (Chapman) When Snowden leaked the documents that proved the NSA had been illegally collecting data through phone records, google, yahoo and other major companies many people were outraged, rightfully so. The government should not be collecting data about the citizens unless they have a warrant. The warrant should be approved not just by the fisa court but by two legally eligible

As a youngster, I was told Big Brother or the government is always watching you and Big Brother’s reach in America has gotten wider since 9/11. National security and safety is of the utmost importance and government agencies like the police, FBI and numerous other government agencies are gathering and retaining data on individuals who are not even a threat. Many Americans believe that the invasion of privacy is deteriorating our freedom. New technology empowers government to track, record, and analyze ever detail of our lives, even our most private information. Big Brother has our personal demographic information and massive government surveillance systems throughout the country collect data from our cars, phone, computer, web cams, social

The NSA is the United States organization that protects the country. The NSA is taking away the people's right to privacy to make the country safer. So far, it is known that the NSA is monitoring billions of records of cell phone calls in the U.S. each day, listening to citizens’ calls, and they read text messages and emails. The NSA also looks at people's Facebook posts. It is acknowledged that the National Security Agency advises U.S. citizens, but they also eavesdrop on people from other countries. Aditionally, the NSA is taking advantage of the citizens’ privacy. Next, the NSA is harming the United States. Security professionals say that spying can make the U.S. Unsafe on the Internet and on computer systems. They say this because the NSA is installing back doors, or accessing a computer system that bypasses security. Using back doors exposes the NSA’s data to harmful hackers, which could endanger this country. Washingtonblog.com stated, “ The NSA is the biggest data collector on the planet, and thus provides a tempting mother lode of information for foreign hackers.” With this understanding, the National Security Agency has an immense amount of information and there is no reason why hackers wouldn't want to see that unknown data. Finally, the NSA monitoring online communications has extremely damaged the United States economy. Researchers over this topic say that the reason our economy is being

According to Vice President Mike Pence, “The Patriot Act is essential to our continued success in the war on terror here at home.” (Brainyquote). Politicians across the political spectrum overwhelmingly agree that the Patriot Act is a necessary measure to protect the citizens of the United States from the imminent threat of terrorism.  After the terror attacks of September 11th, 2001, fear filled the emotions of every red blooded American.  This fear resulted in an uproar and a demand for increased security to stop terrorism.  Politicians created the Patriot Act just over a month after 9/11, and it was signed into law under president Bush on

it doesn’t invade someone’s right to privacy. The right to privacy was implied in the Constitution

The reasons into why I believe privacy should be invaded would be during an official investigation, something along the lines of fraud, murder or a terrorist attack. I believe this should only be done by the person or people investigating the crime. These people would be people from the FBI, CIA or the police. This is the only time that I feel privacy should be invaded so that the police can find the person or people responsible.

Since the files cross the threshold of being “personnel” or “similar” files, the court must determine whether Joe Smith has a substantial privacy interest in withholding the documents. Two factors display a substantial privacy interest: (1) The Forest Service made a promise of confidentiality. (2) Whistleblowers have a substantial privacy interest to ensure they do not become victims of harassment, retaliation, or any other harmful acts. Therefore, disclosing these files constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy, and these cogent points demonstrate it.

Human rights lead their lives in a way that is reasonably separate from public scrutiny, even if that supervision comes from the neighbor's curious eyes, eavesdropping ears of a Researcher or photographer invading a photographer. Each state has laws that look for to balance an individual's right to privacy with freedom of the press. States consider four different forms of invasion of privacy that include intrusion, public disclosure, false light and appropriation. All of four types of invasion of privacy affect to freedom, welfare, and virtues. Intrusion occurs when a person invades another person's private matters that is a deprivation of freedom. The last, appropriation of name or likeness, refers to the unauthorized commercial use of a person's

The definition of the word privacy, according to Dictionary.com is, “The state of being apart from other people or concealed from their view”. The right to feel safe and secure is one that citizens are privileged to have. Although the Government’s use of spying techniques is an invasion of privacy some would argue that the positive effects far outweigh the negative. The ability to increase security, prevent attacks, and provide safety to citizens are just some of the positive effects of Government surveillance. Freedom of privacy comes with being an American, but some citizens are not ready to give up that basic right for added protection (Mullikin and Rahman). There has to be a balance of privacy for some and security for others.