The Grand Archetectual Presence of the Louvre Palace Essay

Never before have I seen a museum as grand as the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. From its architecture to its massive art collection, The Met has a little bit of everything and one is sure to find something that captures his or her interest. Considering that The Met is the United States' largest art museum, it is easy to get lost within its many corridors and wings. My visit to The Met took place during the last week of July. Despite the almost unbearable heat and humidity that hung in the air, visiting museums under these climate conditions is a welcome respite from a suffocating, yet bright summer afternoon.

Of the three theories on how the Great Pyramid was built, in descending order of acceptability, the most suitable theory is Clifford Wilson’s followed by Joseph Davidovits’ and Erich Von Däniken’s argument. Clifford Wilson’s theory is the best because he illustrates how the pyramids were built and provides the evidence to prove his theory, however; this is unlike Joseph Davidovits’ theory because Davidovits does not fully answer questions that arise concerning his theory. The three theories have similar points, but contain very different ideas on the construction of the Great Pyramid. This is obvious in Clifford Wilson’s argument where he is repeatedly disproving Von Däniken’s theory that the “gods” created the pyramids, whereas in

As Edgar Degas once said, “ Art is not what you see, but what others make you see”. The St. Louis Art Museum is a place for artist to display their art and give spectators the option to see art from a new perspective. This was the case for me. As we walked up to the beautifully structured building that stood so tall and wide, my expectations were extremely high. At first glance I notice the bronze statue of King Louis IX of France riding high on his horse. From this statue alone, my expectations of the art museum grew stronger. I have never been to an art museum before, so I wasn’t sure of what to expect. My first expectation was to see huge detailed sculptures right as I walked through the door. That expectation didn’t come true.

3.3 Describe the challenges in trying to bring together the head of Ur-Ningirsu at the Metropolitan Museum in New York and the body of Ur-Ningirsu at the Musee du Louvre in

The use of triangles in the design of Indiana University Art Gallery connects it with another of Pei's creations: the Grand Louvre Pyramid. Pei's Grand Pyramid intentionally turns the tradition and notion of pyramid on its head. The glass pyramid seems to open up the Louvre to the world, which contrasts with the notion of pyramids as sturdy, concealed, and lonely.

One of the more inspiring and brilliantly conceived and constructed dome structures in the world is the Pantheon of Rome. This example imposes a magnificent strength of ingenuity and dominance over their surrounding landscape, and the Pantheon deserves to be researched and admired for its architecturally innovative and bold design of its time. The building was accommodated with serious technical impediments that required a thorough and scrutinizing attention to detail in order to overcome. It is because of the prevailed obstacles by the various designers, architects and builders of this building that captures the consideration of those interested in the development of building technology and progress throughout the

Egypt is also known for its statues depicting various gods and tombs for its numerous pharaohs. Their architectural prowess is a feat marveled at even today. The ability to design and build such grand monuments such as the iconic pyramids of Giza, rivalling even the Mayan and Aztec temples of South and Central America, reveals the true nature of innovation in Egypt. In fact, even without modern tools of measurement, the Great Pyramid, the largest tomb in Egypt, is almost geometrically perfect. For such a large structure, the length of all four sides at its base differ by less than a foot (McKenty 1).

John Volk was the architect that designed The Museum of Fine Arts and explained the structure as such: “a museum should give a feeling of permanence and that is what I have tried to do with this building”. His plan was well executed, when I arrived to the museum I noticed two different designs. The front of the museum reminded me of the Ionic Order, the Volutes and the molded bases became my main focus. The beige paint seemed like a great fit as well, it added to the light and airy flow within the museum and gave me further evidence that the Ionic order outside represented what was displayed inside. However, the actual style of the building was a Palladian Style which originated from Europe in the 1500’s.

The primary structures were located on the central road referred to us dead. The structures and streets were designed in a way that vividly resembled the natural landscape with beautiful mountains and valley. The art masterpiece was calculated, designed and put into the land that long-lasting mark is phenomenal. The Pyramid was built to have its grand stairway faced westward. This was planned for the usage of the Pyramid. It faces to the Sun when it sets. People resided in traditional wooden houses, other high-status people, both religious and political leaders lived in well-built stone houses that were smartly decorated, and even with better drainage

Filippo Brunelleschi, one of these skilled artists, built a revolutionary dome during the Renaissance; the unique structure was called the Dome of Florence. Although, this dome was not like any other building that would be made during this time, for domes were considered impossible to create. In fact, no one in that time period had ever thought of building a dome shaped building. The idea to build a dome came from the Ancient Rome and Ancient Greece period; structures like this were very common in that time period. This dome was built through advanced technique and agriculture. It brought many people together as the unique structure was built, for they wanted to watch the construction of the dome and a big advancement for the future.

Today is day 4, and I am in Cairo to see the pyramids which are on the west side of the Nile River.. The massive masonry structures are amazing. My home in Avon is made of about 18,000 bricks laid by my Dad, Grandfather Gene, Uncle Marvin and many masonry friends of my Dad. It took these men 3 months to lay the 8 inch brick. To see the massive stones the Egyptian placed with such precision is incredible. The Great Pyramid of Giza has 2.3 million stones and took an estimated 20,000 men 23 years to build the Giza pyramid. This man made structure has withstand the harsh weather elements for more than 3800 years. It is said that the pyramids were built for the pharaoh to walk to the Sun God. The structures within the pyramid contains many tunnels,

In many places throughout the world many buildings, monuments and sculptures have been made. Some were made centuries ago, and some were made recently. Many works of arts are significant or a great part of history. Some of the many buildings that have been made throughout time could have also been dedicated to someone or something. For example, the Arch of Titus was dedicated to Titus. Another example would be the Arc de Triomphe which was dedicated to soldiers. Many buildings can have a very significant meaning behind them, in the following essay I will be speaking about the importance of both of these works of art, which are the Arch of Titus and the Arc de Triomphe.

It seems that the pyramid was never completed to be built. This is because it has a flat top and not pointed as it ought to have. Its summit is truncated and it is uneven and coarse and it is 30 square feet in measurement. This is unlike other pyramids which were put a top stone that crowned them and completed their structure (gizapyramid.com, 2011). Other sources suggest that originally the cap existed but is currently missing. They say that the cap stone was sheathed in gold and this golden cap with the beautiful encased white limestone made an impressive, shining sight in the bright sun in Egypt (Krystek, 2010).

The Louvre was not founded as a museum, and the road to attaining today’s program expanded across six centuries of monarchies, wars, treaties, and revolution. Dating far back to the 12th century as a fortress for King Phillip II, the Louvre laid foundations with protective walls, and underground crypts to function not as a gallery for the public, but rather a stronghold for the private. As the decades turned, the old Louvre acclimated to the needs of the monarchies, undergoing usage as both a stronghold and a retreat, but entirely defense-based nonetheless (Deitz). Two centuries passed when Charles V altered the program from a bulwark of protection, changing it into a residency. Here the program shifted towards a notion of more public structure. Several French kings after, Francis I decorated the bulky fortress with a French renaissance style, further changing the Louvre’s appearance and adapting the architecture to the art style of the time. This move would be seen again in I. M. Pei’s controversial addition. Under King Henry IV, the Louvre underwent reconstruction (Kostof). During the rise of Versailles, artisans resided within the Louvre’s halls, giving way to the notion of an art influenced program for the building

Versailles was not always a château or a royal palace it was also a country village on the road to Paris. Now let’s step back to when it was being built. There was a total of four campaigns each lasting around 4-20 years. The first campaign was building the garden and apartments to accommodate 600 guest invited to a celebration party and not much else happened in this campaign. The second building campaign was mainly about creating a place for the royal family to stay at. Louis XIV the king had his own room and his queen also had her own room. Louis’ XIV brother and sister-in-law had their own room as well. A hunting lodge for the royal family was also created for them to stay at as well. The second campaign was also being at