The Grand Challenge Of Engineering On Nitrogen Cycle Essay

In her essay “The Obligation to Endure”, Rachel Carson alerts the public to the dangers of modern industrial pollution. She writes about the harmful consequences of lethal materials being released into the environment. She uses horrifying evidence, a passionate tone, audience, and the overall structure of her essay to express to her readers that the pollution created by man wounds the earth. There are many different ways that pollution can harm the environment, from the nuclear explosions discharging toxic chemicals into the air, to the venomous pesticides sprayed on plants that kills vegetation and sickens cattle. The adjustments to these chemicals would take generations. Rachel

Within the modern world, and the modern thought process people have about our connection with new technologies is one of constant expanse. All caution is thrown to the wind in an attempt to satisfy one insatiable hunger for a certain type of keeping up with the Jones-es. Many authors speak on the wonder of technological advances on society by the exact means of how they work, however, Richard Louv is not this kind of author. He presents technology as useful, but with an underlying tone of a technological numbing agent. We begin to only see it instead of what Earth has given us millions of years. Technology is only a certain part of the problem with the real problem being humanity's mindset toward our greatest asset, nature. Mr. Louv uses extremely profound and intelligent rhetoric to push forward the idea that us as humans are already so broken away from nature, that eventually it will be deemed illogical we used it for anything other than a means produce by it. Richard shows three areas we have really broken apart from nature with the three examples of ad space for parks, extra commodities for an SUV, and the genetic modification of animals.

Since the beginning of the science and technology era, the impact of technology on humanity and society has been growing. New technologies are also emerging, which means that we should be responsible for what we are developing. Therefore, when we develop a new technology, we should respect ethics and take care of all the damage caused.

The carbon cycle deals with the interaction of carbon between living organisms and the nonliving environment. This cycle is a process through which all carbon rotates. The main result of the carbon cycle is to serve as a great natural "recycler" of carbon atoms.

For the Nitrogen Cycle Lab, I, along with four other classmates, designed and created a self-sustaining nitrogen cycle. One factor that helped us create a successful self-sustaining nitrogen cycle was we elevated each tank by placing foam blocks under them. This increased the speed of the water flow. Another good factor we included was we used tape to help loop the tubes to connect two tanks together. The tape also prevented any tubes from shooting water upwards and out of the tank.

Useable nitrogen production is not need to worry because bacteria are not the only source to do nitrogen fixation process. On the other hand, useable nitrogen can be substituted by the interruption of human such as the Haber-Bosch process.

During World War 1 scientists discovered a process which involved taking the nitrogen from the air and turning it into usable ammonia. Most of the ammonia acquired by this process has been used as fertiliser. Upon evaporation, the ammonia proceeds to turning into acid rain. A few attempts have been made to control agricultural nitrogen emissions however, no steps have been taken to regulate agricultural ammonia emissions. Ammonia emissions also come from animal feeding operations. When the ammonia rises into the air and then falls back to the ground, it is broken into nitric and nitrogen acids which can kill plants and fish.

It cannot be denied that, in at least some areas, the invention and progression of technology has benefitted the human race. With the growing industrialization of the world in the last centuries the lives of many people have been made easier. But, this growth of technology is not without its consequences and people are not without their concerns. While industrialization has had its benefits, the environmental cost of this progress is immense, and the impact it has on nature can be hard to swallow. It may seem like talk of the environment is something to be left to scientists or activists specializing in that particular field, but they are

Human subjects in the research field requires us to analyze our approach to physical science according to a higher respect of the subjects, to thoroughly protect the participants as well as others in connection to the research. We must also protect the validity of the data retrieved from the research. The ethical questions at hand aren’t merely right from wrong in a sense but the fairness of the views being administered to participants, including safety. Often research approaches from our past in some instances have come into question, thus allowing us to advance our ethical approach to human research.

We live in an era of speedy advancements, both technologically and environmentally. Humans are on a hypothetical ladder – underneath us are the invention of the telephone, the light bulb, and the automobile. The rungs we are currently balancing on consist of touch screen integration, 3-dimensional printing, voice-controlled technology, eco-friendly buildings, and electric cars. The multitude of steps ahead of us consist of flying cars and space travel without the need for spaceships (both of which are being developed), along with an unimaginable plethora of other advancements. We have not escaped the evolutionary carousel, but that isn’t necessarily a bad

In “Integrating Ethics and Design” by G.F. McLean, the author delves into the difficult relationship between engineering and ethics. He goes on to make the claim that ethics must be taught throughout the course of study for engineers and not as just one course to be taken towards the end of the degree plan. Oftentimes, when ethics is taught as a standalone course for engineers, it is viewed as a second-tier subject in the scope of the degree. In my experience, thus far in an ethics class, students do not approach the material with the same rigor that they would an engineering course which leads to the belief that the topic is not as important. I would like to argue that every person has their own natural code of ethics due to my experience in courses throughout my education that broach the subject. I will attempt to apply McLean’s solution on how ethics should be taught to engineers to my own education. I do not believe teaching ethics in many different courses

“The first fundamental canon in the ASCE Code of Ethics is, “Engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health and welfare of the public and shall strive to comply with the principles of sustainable development in the performance of their professional duties” (ASCE 2006 ). The relevant guideline is,“ Engineers shall approve or seal only those design documents, reviewed or prepared by them, which are determined to be safe for public health and welfare in conformity with accepted engineering standards.” The engineers involved were the first to admit they made changes without the adequate review that is required to fulfill the requirements of this first fundamental canon (Montgomery 2001). If the design changes had been checked, the engineers

In the ever-growing industry of biomedical sciences, many devices have the potential to cause harm to the environment. They have to be treated with such caution and have drastic disposal measures in place to make sure no damage is done to the environment. Yes, these steps are incredibly important with devices such as these, but why use a product with such devastating potential? With today’s modern technology and brilliant scientists should put more effort into creating more environmentally friendly biomedical technology whilst still having the same benefits.

Ethics is the study of what is right and wrong in human conduct. Environmental ethics studies the effects of human’s moral relationships on the environment and everything within it (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2008). The ethical principles that govern those relations determine human duties, obligations, and responsibilities with regard to the Earth’s natural environment and all of the animals and plants that inhabit it (Taylor, 1989). The purpose of this paper is to reveal environmental issues that are threatening the existence of life on Earth, and discus our social obligations to refrain from further damaging our environment, health and life for future generations. I will discus the need for appropriate actions and the ethical

Pollution is a growing concern for some people, but for others it is of no importance. The way humans treat the environment is such a controversial topic that people began to examine the topic from a moral standpoint, so much so that three approaches were developed. The Anthropocentric Approach, the Sentientist Approach, and the Biocentric Approach are the main theories people get examine when debating about environmental ethics. People who have an anthropocentric view believe that nature is there to satisfy human interests, harming the environment is only bad if it also harms humans. For example, cutting down a tree to build a house would be a positive thing because it is valuable to humans. However, if cutting down the tree did not bring about a positive outcome the action would be negative. William Baxter is one of the most vocal ethicist that strongly believe in the anthropocentric approach.