The Great Betrayal By Modi And The Bjp

Looking back at the history of the United States, there are many instances and issues concerning race and ethnicity that shape the social classes that make up the United States today. There are many stories concerning the American Indian that are filled with betrayal, but there is probably none more cruel and shameful as the removal of the Cherokee Indians in 1838. Blood thirsty for money and property, the white settlers would soon use dirty methods to drive the Cherokee out of their home- lands. The United States government played a critical role in the removal of the Cherokee. “Soon the state governments insisted on the removal of the native peoples, who were already out numbered by the white settlers and

There is a larger insight on the whole picture. The PM alone or the along with several ministers set the priorities and direction of the government while allowing the central agencies overlook the situation. Central agencies like Prime Minister’s Office, Privy Council Office, Department of Finance and Treasury Board Secretariat became more powerful in the political system.

Unfortunately, no matter how good the intent of those running for positions of leadership, whether in their community or in the national government, politics have a way of corrupting or inconveniencing even the most upstanding of citizens. For instance, when Congress is presented with a bill to vote upon, each senator and representative must not only vote based upon their personal ideology in regards to the bill, but must also consider other factors such as support from their constituents and even support of the president. It slowly gravitates from a decision based upon what they believe, to a decision based upon how badly they want to risk their position of power in the government. This is the very essence of a flawed democracy! This is the very reason why rhetoric and deceit and empty promises enter politics. Members of the government lose their ideological convictions and give into the mindset of megalomaniacs. Elected officials get so caught up in the “politics”, that they ignore any idea of compromise and solution, and stubbornly hold to their party’s stance on issues, doing anything to keep their seat. The willingness to compromise – something critical to the success of democratic government - has collapsed; the most likely explanation being the growing confidence, arrogance even, of the defenders of inequality and oligarchy. They believe they are winning and see no need for compromise. And that view, which may be tactically accurate, destabilizes the unending cooperation between conservatives and liberals that democracy

In China, corruption is so apparent that often people are disincentivized to owning businesses because permits and consultants cost too much and require bribes. Yet, bribes can cost the economy big money because essentially the corrupt businessmen are taking the money away from public services (111). The issues coming up in the future are that the governments that are corrupt might have negative impacts on other global economies and spread the norm of corruption. Yet, both countries do show the will to “purify the Party” which includes newly implemented rules against gluttony, adultery, and even playing golf under the leadership of Wang Qishan (113). In China a bigger issue is also the fact that the public is becoming increasingly involved in corruption scandals. Officials worry people will get carried away with excessive accusations (115). More issues stem from the type of political system that China has; they employ a nominal legal system that runs at the discretion of the Party leadership so this means that whoever is in power can change the entire political ideals. In India, they are based on a historical British political system with anticorruption laws but these laws are often not enforced. Yet, even when they are enforced, trials in case can last for up to a decade (116). In India, they are making moves to help out their corruption issues. They implemented the Aadhaar program

This special reports dives into the changing business world of India. It starts off by describing a big day for India, one where county leaders discussed the fact that business people in their country feel disheartened and the dynastic culture of the entrepreneurs in India. “The world is Flat” by Thomas Friedman is mentioned as he describes India as a “silicon Valet with worse roads and spicier food”. And an idea of a new form of capitalism in India is discussed; stating that Indian capitalism is concentrated and that in the stock market debt levels are low and growth rates are strong. The idea of India’s sense of ownership is mentioned with the evidence that many Indian firms are under family or founder control. India is growing to be

The biggest democracy of the world and the largest democracy in the world, India and the United States of America have always had an on/off relationship in spite of the their near identical origins, institutions and problems. Emerging from a British colonial past both countries have withstood a number of challenges and complications that arise in a modern heterogeneous state.India, on one hand is a 1.2 billion strong nation which is expected to become the world’s most populous within a generation. Armed with a nuclear arsenal, India boast of an army that is third after only China and the USA. Economically, the GDP of India in terms of purchasing power stands at $4.7 trillion which is the fourth largest in the world and is rising at the

At a recent event, he said, ‘If you look around the world, big-bang dramatic reforms happen around crisis.’ He also added, ‘Big-bang reforms are not easy to happen in democracy. In democracies, you have multiple veto centres, multiple decision-making centres and it is very difficult to push through decisive change, and if you look at India at this juncture, we are not in crisis.’ There you go. All you big-bang change seekers, the party is over even before it started. The government has, in effect, said it doesn’t want to rock the boat. Things won’t change much and things won’t change fast. Doesn’t matter if the election campaign promised a bold new government. We saw TV ads that had farmers saying ‘acche din aanewaalehain’. Investors and businesses were promised a dramatic change for the better in a Congress-mukt Bharat. Voters were asked to deliver a decisive mandate if they wanted real change. And they did. They came out in droves and gave a mandate no single party has received in thirty years. What could stop India now? Nothing really. And yet, the big changes didn’t happen. A soft interim budget, a calibrated full year budget, a few positive statements on taxation a stuck Land

India has an incredible amount of instability and corruption in politics. India has two main political parties- Indian National Congress and the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP). These two are the major parts of the Parliament government. Currently, there is a vast amount of corruption involving major issues like elections, railways, customs, revenue collection, etc. An example of political instability relating to corruption is the Hawala Bribery Scandal in 1990. The Hawala Scandal involved over 115 top politicians in India including the Prime Minister, Union Ministers, Leader of Opposition, members of Congress, etc. The politicians were allegedly receiving payments from four brothers who were brokers of the Hawala companies, which amounted to upwards of US$18 million. The case and investigation started with the arrest of two militants in 1991. One by One, the cases of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) were getting thrown out. Evidence was counted as inadmissible and most politicians got off scot free. After the cases were dropped, it became public in a sworn testimony that the judge for the cases was made to make it all go away. It included three top political parties and everyone involved was a much involved as the next. This scandal rocked the country as their democracy lost trust and loyalty from the people.

Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal is rushing blindfolded to a precipice with his proposal to amend the constitution. If he does not listen to the calls to open his eyes before it is too late, he will fall off, taking the country with him. That is scary.

Mr. Narendra Modi has become a prime minister of india in last year 2014. He is a popular leader in india. Searching on Goggle with prime minister Narendra Modi resulted in 1,84,00,000 web points on internet (as of 29 May 2015). For all different praises as well as comments,” regarding Mr. Narendra Modi. This statements keep coming in Internet and on the various news media, in ongoing fashion can we collects all types of opinions in different media, with including updated, and cross-referenced discussions by glossographer? Big Data processing is an excellent example for this type of summarization program, as the information comes from heterogeneous, multiple, autonomous sources with complex and making their relationships, and keeps increaing.

In our reading this week, Carol Upadhya writes about the emergence of a “‘new’ middle class in the ‘New India’” It emphasizes about how India’s old middle class has given way to the new middle class in the past 15 to 20 years. The new middle class has become the center of attraction in the consumer market in Indian cities due to the rising incomes. The landscapes of many metro cities in India have changed dramatically overnight with posh localities, malls and luxury cars thriving the markets and choking the existing roads. Though the origins of middle class can be traced to colonial period it stared dominating under the post-Independence Nehruvian regime. This old middle class was dependent on public –sector jobs but the new middle class is booming due to the fast growing private sector and globalised economy.

The clean image of the leaders of the AAP has lent credibility, hidden beneath the truth of those promises. Consequently, the support that was so far the part of the property of the established parties turned towards AAP. The middle class people of India dissociated itself with established political parties for the reason that, because it found itself helpless before them. For them, the Aam Aadmi Party was the party of their type, which appeared capable to give off clean governance to the people. People hoped if the widespread corruption prevalent in politics and bureaucracy would not fully disappear; at least it would boil down to a tolerable level. At the top of all this, all the voters of AAP represent that very anger that had emanated from the inequality of economic liberalization based growth model of Manmohan Singh in 1991. Rising inflation acted as the catalyst adding fuel to the fire of people’s anger.

The India experience underlines the difficulty in making changes on an adequate scale in a country of great size, population and complexity. But it also shows that the problems of change can only be understood when the beliefs, knowledge and attitude of the people are addressed.

India is heading for the 2014 General Election, which will decide which party is going to get the clear majority in the Parliament. As a part of preparation for the big political battle, all the parties seem to be ready with their campaigning strategy and issues.

At least, now alert citizens can slow down corrupt officers and politicians.Third, Indian politics will hopefully mature as more information passes through the hands of political rivals, police, judiciary, media and the people. The Act will reveal who is exploiting whom and how one can get justice for the poor and the needy. The judiciary will now have better data to decide against the corrupt.That sounds so far flung, doesn't it? Let us start from the district level. If the road leading to your town is washed out in the first rains of the season, you might like to ask who was given the contract to build that road, at what price and what the terms and conditions were.Was the contractor related to a Member of Parliament or a member of legislative assembly in that area? During the building of that road, did any government officer object to any deficiency or malpractice? Was there any communication in this regard? The concerned departments will have to come up with answers in the stipulated period.