The Great Divorce Lewis Analysis

Since these souls lived their lives in a windstorm of emotions and feelings, their penalty represents the literal way in which they sinned. In addition to the punishments relating to the sins of the sinners, there are also punishments which contrast with the actions of the sinners and represent what the sinner was lacking in life. For example, the neutral souls were people who could not choose between good and evil during their life, being untouched by cares of religion and faith. As punishment in hell, they have to forever chase a blank banner in circles and are constantly stung by wasps and hornets. By taking no action on Earth in regards to their faith, they have to spend an eternity running after a banner with no hopes of catching it. And because they were untouched by cares, hornets and wasps symbolically sting them forever. The neutral souls' retribution was opposite of their sin, but most punishments represent the crimes in an ironic fashion. By choosing this method of eternal punishment, God is able to inflict the most pain on the souls in hell because they are constantly reminded of their sins at all times and are never able to escape the truth of what they did. This punishment closely resembles the eye-for-an-eye tactic preached in the Old Testament, but is done mainly to carry out perfect justice. Even the inscription above the gates of hell, "justice it was that moved my great creator" (89), suggests that the sole purpose of this place

Be it so, since he who now is sovereign can dispose and bid what shall be right: furthest from He is best, whom reason hath equaled, force hath made supreme above his equals. Farewell, happy fields, where joy forever dwells! Hail, horrors! Hail, Infernal World! And thou, profoundest Hell, Receive thy new possessor—one who brings a mind not to be changed by place or time. The mind is its own place, and in itself can make a Heaven of Hell, a Hell of Heaven.”

Book 3 of Mere Christianity contains 12 separate chapters, which has far too great a scope to address properly here, so a glimpse will have to suffice. In the first, Lewis examines three components of morality; the relations between men, the interior moral mechanics of a man, and the relationship between a man and the God who made him. Lewis makes the case that, since we are destined to live forever in one state or another, it is desperately important that we pay attention to the sort of Being we are becoming. Lewis points out that most of humanity can agree that keeping relations between men running smoothly are important, but varying world views and religions-or lack of religion, have produced some disagreements on the necessity of keeping one’s own ship in order, as it were, and it completely breaks down when the relationship between a man and his Maker are addressed, as there is virtually no agreement there.

He tries to explain his point of view of Hell so we can have an idea of what and how is the afterlife. Every bad decision or action will be paid up in hell. Everyone in hell is divided based on the relationship between the offense committed and the punishments deserved. He wants people to understand and identify themselves with the importance of life and a person’s relationship with God. Based on committing good actions and decisions, we must leave to look for salvation in the afterlife. The action of doing the right thing is what lead you to better outcomes and fewer punishments in the

According to MacDonald, heaven and hell cannot coexist in a single soul, and while it is possible to leave hell and enter heaven, doing so implies turning away (repentance); or as depicted by Lewis, giving up paltry worldly pleasures and self-indulgences — which have become impossible for the dead anyway — and embracing ultimate and unceasing joy itself.

“Marriage and Divorce in America” by Tony Hilfer is an effectively constructed argument. Therefore, it is a good, reliable source.

Robert Herrick, an English poet, once said, “Hell is no other but a soundlesse pit, where no one beame of comfort peeps in it.” Picture any type of Hell with relief, happiness, or even the smallest crack of a smile. There is no place. In fact, one can only think of the complete opposite, whether it is a Hell filled with neglect, pain, disgust, or a never-ending life of horror. This is the place created by Dante Alighieri; The Inferno is exactly the type of Hell where no person would want to be. Even those who acted upon the lightest of sins suffered greatly. While each realm contained a different sinner, the punishment that each were forced to face was cruel, repulsive, and sometimes rather disgusting. Through grieving tears without an

There was no heaven and no hell; we just survived this period of time on earth. We died, we were buried, we rotted, and that was the end. This was my worldview. This was the lens through which I interpreted everything in life.

On the contrary, this view stems from looking at the punishment from the standpoint of human justice systems. This is not a valid way to view hell as a punishment because God determined what acts deserved what punish meant a great number of years before the creation of any human justice systems. Although you must “die” an earthly to be sent to Hell, you are not “dead” while in Hell because you can not be tormented if you are dead. The unsaved will have everlasting consciousness which enables them to suffer the torment.

A major theological problem exist as it related to Christ descending into hell to take the keys of death. Although the Apostle’s Creed points out that Jesus descended down into hel, His descent was not about suffering, but about a triumph victory over Satan. In order to ascertain the truth behind the afterlife, the validity of hell has to be established.

The similarities and differences between Heaven and Hell give meaning to Hell physical and emotional presence. As the audience analyzes the physical descriptions of Hell given in

Butler addresses Hell, judgment, and Holy War in three separate, distinct parts of the book. To begin “Part 1: The Mercy of Hell,” Butler tells a short, fictional anecdote about a man questioning his faith because Hell makes God appear sadistic and not good. The anecdote is one of the many conceptions about Hell that Butler later addresses. Part 1 then begins with “Chapter 1: Heaven and Earth.” Butler writes that many people have a me-centered story that focuses on their actions determining God’s place for them in the afterlife; however, this story fails to focus on God.

S. Lewis’ controversial book, The Great Divorce, can be taken many different ways depending on the reader. When researching this book, people will find writers and others who hate the works of C. S. Lewis calling him a heretic. These attacks at Lewis, however harsh and bold, are easily disarmed with the preface of these books, stating this writing is not to be taken as fact. Numerus readers find the true goal of these writings as a story with morals rather than a book of doctrines. The unique way Lewis writes these stories emphasizes the important points he wants to get across. With all this in mind, if the reader knows the downfalls and the purpose of the book as asking questions the reader has to answer their self. Nevertheless, this book with the criticism and possible confusion is still worth reading, as it provides amazing insight and prompts the readers to think for

I personally found the video "Mathematics of Divorce" the most interesting. I was impressed by John Gottman's research and how he could predict whether a couple would divorce (with an average of 90% accuracy) simply by analyzing a series of simple questions and answers that the couples gave during a short 30 minute interview. Interestingly, he could even predict how long a couple would stay together based on what he believed were two high risk periods during the course of a marriage. The first high risk period was during the first 7 years of marriage (where couples are learning and adjusting to their new roles/ responsibilities) and the second being between 16-20 years into the marriage (when teenagers are present in the home). I was most

In the last 25 years, divorce has become a major issue in American society. Since the turn of the century, the divorce rate has held steady between 4.0-3.2 divorces per 1000 people per year (National Vital Statistics System, 2015). With this rising divorce rate, more children are living between parents, or in single family homes, and many of these children have been exposed to altercations between parents, as well as rough custody battles and divorce settlements. Traumatic experiences like these are highly likely to stick with children of divorce throughout their life, especially if the child is older at the time of the divorce.