The Great Influenza Rhetorical Analysis

The natural sciences have a lot in common with Pandora’s box. Both contain any number of wonders and possibilities within them, the promise of untold riches and benefits just as great as the threat of disaster and pain. The fear of catastrophe can keep the scientific box shut, and science may not progress at all. For this reason, scientists should only be held responsible for the application of their discoveries to an extent that does not give them blame for the negative. For should scientists be blamed for the tragedies that result from their work, not only do they become a scapegoat for the abusers of their knowledge, but the process of scientific discovery itself becomes hindered by this fear of the unknown.

The purpose of The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is to protect the health of America and to “promote the quality of life through the prevention and control of the disease, injury, and disability (CDC, 2013).” The CDC has a concern about a growing disease that is normally found in children to young adults called Attention- Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, also known as ADHD. This Rhetorical Analysis will be focused on ADHD. The CDC’s Website is trying to inform current or future patients, parents and care givers, and teachers on how to handle this illness.

John Barry starts out his argument by using the anaphora of uncertainty. He repeatedly uses the word, uncertainty, to make his point. Barry is emphasizing that scientists have to possess the strength to move past the feeling of doubt. He states that science is filled with uncertainty, “science teaches us to doubt” (line 12). The scientific

The quote delivered by the intelligent and insightful John M Barry states, “To be a scientist requires not only intelligence and curiosity, but passion, patience, creativity, self-sufficiency, and courage” (Barry 5). Scientists endure a great amount of adversity than most people think. They have to retain a wide variety of skills to assist them in different circumstances that form in their laboratory. Scientist need to have persistence, so that when they fail, they will be willing to try again. As well as, acceptance to come to terms with the fact that an experiment turns out the opposite of their theory. In John M Barry’s passage,“The Great Influenza” he utilizes direct diction and powerful punctuation to characterize scientific research.

In John M. Barry's, “The Great Influenza” he argues that to be a scientist there is a need to embrace uncertainty and that while not all experiments give the expected result, scientist need to learn how to make the experiments work in their favor. Through using the names of well-known scientist to show the hard work research is and by comparing the tedious work of different scientist to finding what is inside a rock, this is done in order to demonstrate that scientific research is strenuous, difficult, time-consuming process that launch researchers into the unknown and challenges them even when the end results “do not simply work.” He addresses American citizens which are seen through the diction, with a choice of words easy to understand and the analogous relationship between research, “grunt, tedious, work” and the analysis of a rock to be able to show that scientific research is challenging work. To begin, he utilizes the name of

Barry metaphor is to convey to scientist the process of questioning and doubt in their own

Adventure’s in the Atomic Age displays the idea that financial barriers and difficult courses should not be what is stopping someone from being successful in the field of science. “Scientists would feel a sense of purpose and inner satisfaction even if their efforts were not important to the world in which we live. In actuality, of course, there is no group of persons on whom society as a whole depends so heavily” (292).

The journal is peer reviewed and published at the University of Oxford, so the resource is credible. The sole purpose of this article is to show how scientists

The path of research is one taken by many scientists to answers questions that plague the

Science is loved and feared by humans, depending on how it is used and applied. It both helps people and causes difficulties. In some ways it has hurt lives, like in Macaela Mackenzie’s “What to know about 2018’s Deadly Flu Season” and Robert Louis Stevenson’s “The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr.Hyde”. In some ways it has helped our lives, like in Fabrizio Bensch’s “Scientists find DNA of first-ever bubonic plague, warn of new outbreaks.”, in Daniel Defoe’s “ A Journal of the Plague Year”, and in Harvard University Contagion : Historical Views of Diseases and Epidemics “The Great Plague of London, 1665”. First, in Mackenzie’s text how it hurt lives.

In the passage “The great beyond” author John M. Barry Analyzes scientist and their research. He explained the qualities a well rounded scientist should and should not batain, but more importantly the creativity and readiness that a scientist needs to have when facing and exploring the unknown world of science.

With the use of definition, Barry is able to assert his own understanding of what it means to be a scientist. He lays out the traits that one traditionally believes to be are needed to produce scientific research, curiosity and intelligence, and then refutes the accepted idea by laying out the additional characteristics he believes that really make the possibility of progress a reality: passion, courage, and creativity. He defines a true scientist of someone not only willing to accept uncertainty, but to embrace it. A real scientist is a frontier dweller blazing his ahead, well aware of the risks of their

“The process by which either the individual makes or the community makes the transition from constrained fall to the pendulum or from dephlogisticated air to oxygen is not one that resembles interpretation…Rather than being and interpreter, the scientist who embraces a new paradigm is like the man wearing inverting lenses. Confronting the same constellation of objects as before and knowing he does so, he nevertheless finds them transformed through and through in many of their details”

“What is a scientist after all? It is a curious man looking through a keyhole, the keyhole of nature, trying to know what's going on.” He got in an automobile crash that left both his arms broken and the right side of his body paralyzed.

The central theme of the movie centers on the difficulties of being a scientist as the movie focuses on the journeys of Rob Townley, Kil Carroll, and Gabe Cubberley through the Columbia University Ph.D. program. Interest in science requires a specific passion for learning new information and using knowledge to solve problems. Yet, as the movie shows, not all people have the capabilities to be scientists. Though people may work with science, they do not have the dedication and patience required to do laboratorial research. The movie begins with a discussion of how a natural obsession of science is required in order to survive as a scientist: there must be genuine excitement for science as well as an overwhelming anxiety that can only be satiated