The Great Man Approach During The Mid 1800 ' S

From the vantage point of the present, it is easy to look back at the tenure of any great leader and draw conclusions about just what it was that made him/her great. We can examine the circumstances under which their leadership flourished; piece together what we know of their character and personality traits; delve into the factors that may have driven them; and dissect their leadership style all in an effort to pinpoint the source of their success. The ‘Great Man’ theory, popular in the 19th century and now thoroughly debunked, held that leaders are born, not made; suggesting that men like George Washington, Martin Luther King Jr., and Winston Churchill were born with the innate capacity to change the world (Landis,

With change comes consequences. Industrialization of the United States had indirectly tarnished the Gilded Age, and now that this era was coming to an end, reformers were left to clean up the mess. Hence, the Progressive era was born. The Progressive movement was based in the urban middle class and focused on the improvement of society, the economy, and politics. Yet, the movement was not unified. Each reform group of the era had a separate goal that they would focus on. Each president also had a separate vision of national reform. Presidents like Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and Woodrow Wilson were particularly influential when it came to reform, but each had a specific idea of which reforms should be instated and which should be ignored. Disunity in the Progressive Era hindered its overall effectiveness, allowing specific reform groups focused on democracy to gradually cross social, economic, and political barriers while others failed unite the nation behind their cause.

The end of the Gilded Age lead to the birth of the Progressive Age. Starting in c. 1896, the Progressive Age came to fruition when the industrialization of the United States was at its peak. As a result, immigrants flooded the United States in search of jobs. This caused major problems, as the immigrants’ lack of wealth and poor education lead to a multitude in and out of the workplace. Some of these problems included overcrowded housing and lousy working conditions.

The Gilded Age was associated with many difficulties - unprecedented fortunes and poverty, urban squalor, unhygienic food production, and other issues – that many Americans were left to deal with. In the early 1900s, “widespread dissatisfaction with new trends in American society spurred the Progressive Era, named for the various ‘progressive’ movements that attracted various constituencies around various reforms” (Andrew et al. 1). This new era was the age in which people tried to solve problems through individual and group action. The Progressive Movement was dedicated to the advancement of women’s rights and social reform by targeting trusts and protecting wildlife areas; however, despite their reform tendencies, progressives

The Gilded Age, which got from one of Mark Twain's books, The Gilded Age: A Taleof Today, depicts a period in the United States with genuine social issues. Taking after the Civil War, the United States hopped to the front of the world in industrialization. Because of America's monetary development, the rich got wealthier and poor people, well got poorer. The Labor Movement was a significant point amid this time, and most likely changed the way America works today. As indicated by, today, the Gilded Age depicts the huge social, political and financial change that the US experienced from the last third of the nineteenth century to World War I. The Gilded Age did not just impetus industrialized power inside the United States, it additionally stamped basic in setting up the New York Art world in the worldwide workmanship advertise(Kresser, 2013).

During the Gilded Age, American’s society changed dramatically in many aspects including communication, technology, education, industrialization, politic, economy, and culture. As citizens of a powerful nation with the dramatic growth and enormous wealth, many Americans also changed their attitudes and their ways of life. They tended to see themselves as “a powerful species.” Conceit and self-centeredness are attitudes easily to be found at many Americans in that period. From the political aspect, the appearance of imperialism at the end of the nineteenth century is a vivid evidence. According to Isaac 's Storm: A Man, a Time, and the Deadliest Hurricane in History, men thought they could control the weather thanks to our scientific

Henry James and Abraham Cahan lived in the turn of the twentieth century, where social and economic corruptions were gilded by the extreme wealth of the few. This period also marked the beginning of a distinction between the European and American culture. Both authors artistically create in their stories the tragedy and drama of Americans in Europe and Europeans in America. James lived comfortably in both America and Europe, and it showed in his work "Daisy Miller: A Study" in which he creates a fairy tale land full of extravagant hotels, beautiful sceneries, sparkly blue lakes and well dressed people. Cahan was an immigrant living during the time of mass Americanization of

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. once stated, “The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.” For centuries, philosophers, kings and many more have been on a quest to determine what it takes to become a great ruler and to maintain power. Between the Middle Ages (500 A.D.) and the Renaissance (1500 A.D.), in the books The Prince and The Life of Charlemagne, Niccolo Machiavelli and Einhard displayed their idea of what the theory of leadership is. Based on the ideas expressed in each text it appears as if virtu, amorality, and religious practices made the difference in what it took to become an effective leader during the Middle Ages.

Good analysis, but I wonder how much of our perspective is based on a relative interpretation. Even though it appears to us that the road to the legal world is a great deal more challenging today than in the 1800’s, but perhaps it’s just what we perceive. Truth be told I took on the same viewpoint as you, that todays process is harder. On the surface it appears we are correct in our assumption. However we have no set basis for comparison, its like comparing apples and oranges. There is a lot more to becoming a lawyer today but at the same time, today everything is centralized making process that much easier. For instance, instead of caring tons of casebooks everything now can be downloaded on to mobile device for quick reference.

The revolution of an industrial based economy and transportation, changed Americans daily lives in the mid 1800s century by improving their lifestyle and their daily needs when before they have to make the materials themselves now we have the opportunity to purchase them in the market by a price but before that how did industry manufacturers and transportation change the economy and improved people's lives despites the many outcomes it has in long term run.

There were leaders that were born into it and did amazing things, that help them remind the people who they are and what they are able to do. With that being said my interpretation of “The Great Person Theory” is having nothing or very little and rising to accomplishing plenty and showing true characteristics of what a statesman does. In this case, I do believe that “The Great Person Theory” is a valid interpretation of history when it comes to sharing stories like Cimon, Julius Caesar, and

Bass, B. M. (1990, Winter). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, pp. 19-31.

Leadership has become overly romanticized by popular culture, leaving little research and attention to followership (Meindl). This focus on leadership has left a deficit in the development of

In part two, Author sheds light on relational leadership. Relational leadership applies to everyone irrespective of gender, race or seniority. Leadership is always considered as power and authority but in day to day life, leadership is not about power and authority but it is about taking people with you, motivate them, show confidence in them and show that you believe in their capability. People work better if they are motivated. In my career I have worked for several different managers but one of the mangers, Amar for whom I liked working the most. I worked for Amar for few months during intra skills development program. He was a people oriented person. Also, he was famous for developing leaders in the team. When I started working he gave me the project to work on and told me to lead it and handle it through the completion. He let me take the decisions and

This era has become very competitive and in order for organizations to be successful they need leaders to establish and manage relationships and lead their subordinates accordingly in order to achieve the company’s mission and objectivity. Leadership overall plays a very important role in the success of a company because the leader controls their subordinates behavior. If subordinates have uncertainties that are not directed accordingly it can result in an unhealthy environment, and in turn it will affect the growth of the organization, therefore good leadership is necessary.