The Greek Weapon: A Part Of War

The Hellenic Age and the Hellenistic Age are the two main periods in Greek history. The Hellenic Age is significantly different from the Hellenistic Age. The Hellenic period saw the rising and falling of the polis while Hellenistic period was plagued by warfare among the remaining dynasties. Despite the differences between the Hellenic and Hellenistic periods, the one thing that remained consistent in both periods was the Greeks' ability to not only advance science and philosophy but to strive for excellence in everything that they undertook including their ability to deemphasize the role of the gods in their lives.

The Persian War had a great impact on Greek society, particularly allowing them to become united during and after the Persian War. The Greek city-states that used to fight amongst themselves had now became united under one common threat allowing ideas to flow more freely than they had before. This unification lasted long after the Persian threat had subsided but the impact that unification had, was undeniable allowing advances in government, philosophy, art, theater, and architecture. In fact, the advances the Ancient Greeks made during the Classical period still impact lives today.

The Greeks, Trojans, and Spartans were very resourceful and strategic when in battle. The Spartans were one of the many armies in Greece, and they rose to the top through tactics and strategies. Greek tactics and strategies were very successful due to how many wars they won. However Trojans were out of the “box” thinkers, and were not always an easy fight.

"Ancient Greece - War - The British Museum." Ancient Greece - War - The British Museum. British Museum, n.d. Web. 22 Feb. 2017.

Current militaries have benefitted from the principles of ancient Greek and Roman warfare by studying the ancient battles, tactics, and use of supplies to develop effective military plans. Current militaries study and debate historical turning points of the ancient battles to understand how the leaders planned and executed battles. The empires’ growth was due in part to the might and successes of their military. The strength of their militaries came from many factors including their use of armor, weapons, and military tactics. The empires’ leaders used these three advantages to create the superior armies of their time.

and Ares was on the Spartan military.The war started when ares got extremely anxious for war and messed with Athena, Athena agreed to the war and gathered an army as ares was off to do the same. Athena talked Athens into war, Athena and took three days to gather her army, Athena used her time gathering, training, and discussing their war plan. After those three days they met on the battlefield,Athena where were you been i was gathering

Athens, the most famous and richest of the Greek city states dominated the ancient world for a long time. The Athenians developed, many new war tactics that were adopted by other Greek city states. Sparta was also a powerful Greek city state and one of the most feared military powers in the ancient world. Spartans grew up in a different society and used many war tactics that were different from traditional Greek warfare (Paton). At one point in time, Athens and Sparta were the most powerful civilizations in the whole world thanks to their very effective war tactics. Some strategies they used were good armor, intense training and surprise attacks. Spartans began training at a young age and were fierce fighters. Athens was rich and had a good navy. In the Persian war, Athens and Sparta worked together and ended up winning. But Athens and Sparta were two very different societies (Hayes 117). Even though the Spartans won the war the golden age of Greece ended this show how military power can make or destroy a great civilization.

Logically, it makes sense that the army with the most advanced technology would win battles against a less equipped one. However, in his paper titled “Weapons, Technology Determination and Ancient Warfare,” Fernando Echeverria Rey brings to light the paradox of this idea in ancient warfare, as well as undermine the modern idea of ‘technological determinism’ by claiming that it does not have an ancient equivalent. His argument approaches the study of ancient warfare from different perspectives as he “[offers] alternative ways to explain technological and tactical change in warfare” (Echeverria 2010: 24). Echeverria Rey makes strong points for his arguments and supports his ideas clearly. While

By 148 BC, Rome controlled the Mediterranean Sea and designated this body of water as “Mare Nostrum, or “our sea,” but in 214 BC, at the beginning of the Macedonian Wars, Rome faced several rivals in their seas. In the Western Mediterranean, Rome faced a powerful enemy in Carthage, which it defeated in the Punic Wars from 264 to 146 BC. The successors to Alexander the Great’s Empire dominated the Eastern Mediterranean. After the Macedonian Wars, which spanned four wars from 214 until 148 BC, however, Rome defeated these states and only the Polemic regime in Egypt remained free of Roman control. Roman tactics,

The Spartans always proved how much greater, stronger, and more powerful they were than the rest of the Grecian world in everything they accomplished. They were superior in every form of combat known at the time and had the best military known in ancient history. The Spartans had an intellectually advanced society, powerful women, forcible rulers, and the toughest military in the surrounding area of Europe.

The Greek civilization was a great paradox, meaning that they had very bad failures but they also had great success. The Greeks were very divided, what I mean by that is that the Greek citizens were only loyal to their own poleis. These people would show no loyalty to Greece which lead to no political sense. Many people of Greece started to kill each other due to the conflict between each of the poleis. The Peloponnesian War was a war between the two city-states, Sparta and Athens.

The Greeks and Persia had a lot of conflict, argot ‘The Persian War’ but could it have been inevitable? Greece and Persia, though, both in the same time period they had quite a few differences. They both had the same goals to expand and conquer any civilizations that they felt threatened by. These two large and expanding empires, could they have ever joined together? No, they were so different one had slaves, one did not, one had religious freedom, one did not and so on. The Persian war, all started when Persia attacked a Greek civilization entitled ‘Sparta’! Sparta held off the Persians for as long as they could the war contined and Greece won. This battle is so big in our history it couldn’t have been avoided both civilizations wanted power

Throughout the course of history there have been many great and powerful civilizations. These civilizations made their way to power in many ways including military force, great wealth, and politics. These civilizations include the Assyrians, the Egyptians, the Romans, and in more recent times, the United States of America. Another civilization that is often mentioned to be a part of this prestigious group is that of the Ancient Greeks. The primary reason being the Ancient Greek’s military advancement made them superior to the other ancient armies of the time allowing their civilization to grow.

Through the manuscripts of Herodotus, an ancient historian who hailed from the mountainous lands of Greece, modern day historians have been granted the ability to piece together the multitude of events that supposedly transpired during the years 480 and 479 BC between the Persian empire and the city-states of the classical Greece (Herodotus). The second Persian invasion of Greece, which took place in the previously mentioned years, was a part of the many series of battles and encounters that made up the Greco-Persian Wars. This invasion in particular, however, probably saw one of the most distinguished battles in ancient European warfare befall. As a whole, the second Persian invasion of Greece consisted of several battles that transpired within a close proximity of one another chronologically. The war itself was fairly short-lived, even for its time, lasting only the course of approximately one year. The battles themselves took place in Thermopylae, Artemisium, Salamis, Platae, and Mycale (Setzer). The Persian invasion forces were led by King Xerxes I of Persia, the son of Darius I of Persia. Prior to the reign of Xerxes I, King Darius I had wanted to take control of ancient Greece. As such, he ordered two campaigns which made up the first Persian invasion of Greece. Much to his hindrance, however, Darius I breathed his last breath before he was presented with the opportunity to carry out a second invasion.

Greece has financial problems. The country cannot come up with a 2 billion dollar payment on a debt that amounts to 175% of the country’s yearly domestic product. As a result, America’s stock exchange fell some 200 points.