The Gulf War Strategy Essay

The military has been instrumental in the protection and development of U.S interests around the world. From the Revolutionary War, which established the United States as a nation, through the World Wars, which set up the U.S as one of the world super powers, to its current war on terror, the military has helped and protected U.S. interests around the world. During all these wars American soldiers have proudly served their country. Because of these wars America is famous throughout the world for military power and its protection of freedom in the world. Today the U.S is an international symbol of wealth and power; it has the largest Gross Domestic Product in the world as well as the strongest military. Yet even America falls prey to a

In the news presentation, the general discusses the moves and strategies of the combined forces of the U.S. and their allies against the Iraqis in 1991. The allied forces were working with an objective of getting the Iraqis out of Kuwait and protecting Kuwait. The following items are different Principles of War in action.

A month later, the coalition military (made up primarily by the United States, French, United Kingdom) intervention began. With the help of the four selected lessons by Robert McNamara, the situation can be contained and can be looked upon in hindsight as a success.

A guided response paper presented to the faculty of the U.S. Army War College, in partial satisfaction of the requirements of the Theory of War and Strategy (TWS) course.

In order to develop effective solutions for complex military problems, the Joint Community within the US Military adopted the methodology of Operational Design in Joint Doctrine. This methodology addresses the concept of complex, ill-structured or “wicked” problems. In fact, Lessons Learned as a result of operations conducted over the last 15 years played an instrumental role in the continued development of this doctrine. Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) illustrates a perfect case study for evaluation utilizing this methodology. Therefore, the intent of this paper is to evaluate US Military campaign planning for OIF by using operational design as the framework for this analysis. First, this paper looks at how planners and commanders interpreted pre-invasion civilian policy guidance, their understanding of the current operational environment, and how these commanders defined the problem. Next, it identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the initial approach. After discussing this initial approach, this paper examines how commanders assessed the campaign and refined the approach – to include how the reframing occurred. Lastly, it provides examples of how these lessons learned shaped current joint planning policy and doctrine.

In 2003, President George W. Bush and Secretary of State Colin Powell launched an invasion of the nation of Iraq. United States Secretary of State Colin Powell outlined the reasons Iraq posed a threat to international security in a speech he gave at the United Nations. Iraq’s nuclear weapons program concerned the Bush administration. Fearing Iraq might use this program to act aggressively in the region, and wanting to secure oil supplies and a friendly regime, the administration pursued a plan of action to remove Iraqi President Saddam Hussein from power (FLS 2016, 43). A constant secure supply of oil stood as a cornerstone of the military-industrial complex thriving in the United States and a friendly regime in such an oil rich country remained an important objective of President Bush. This directly conflicted with the desire of President Saddam Hussein of Iraq to remain in power.

1. As our brave men and women in uniform find themselves embroiled again in a conflict in the Middle East, debate surrounding the timeliness and necessity of this second Gulf conflict has ceased in most professional circles. However, before the current conflict began, controversy raged over when and how to best prosecute this situation. Many argued that the United States should have worked through the United Nations to pursue a resolution that had the consensus of the world behind it. That endeavor, however, was doomed to failure from the start. The United States sought to solve this dilemma using military force. France and Germany desired to diffuse it using anything but force. In order to

2003 July – United States-appointed Governing Council meets for first time. Commander of United States forces

Three options were brought up to the Bush Administration. The first approach was brought up and supported by the Iraq Study Group as well as Bush’s new Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates. It can be stated quite simply, Get out of Iraq. This approach may not have been the most ideal but, in Baghdad 2006 was a deadly time for all people involved since enemy attacks had risen a third higher than the year before. Major controversy was also going down within the US military regarding the question of who the enemies were. The unknown frightened many because it was a clear flashback to Vietnam, as well it

“Bang, Bang”. Imagine you are an innocent civilian living in Kuwait. All of a sudden, you are utterly startled by the sound of guns and bombs going off. You are under attack! What would you do if you were this person? This scenario would take place during the Persian Golf War which took place in 1990-1991. Forty two days later, U.S. President George H.W. Bush declared a cease fire. This was pretty unnecessary considering that most of the people who attacked either surrendered or fled from The war sight. The Persian Gulf Was was without a doubt a devastating event in which many people lost their liver trying to protect the economy from failing and defending against all forces.

The case of the two Gulf Wars presents a clear example for your administration of how conflicts involving similar countries and battlegrounds could result in different outcomes based on how they are carried out. The First Gulf War proved to be a quick, well-conducted war with a decisive mission plan and considerable support from the United Nations. However, just a decade later, in a drastically different political climate, the Second Gulf War, has concluded to be a drawn out failure for the United States. This memo will contrast these two wars, giving lessons that highlight the successes of the first conflict and the problems that were present during the second. The goal of these lessons are to provide insight to other wars that the United

After the 9/11 terror attacks, the Bush Administration launched the war on terrorism in attempts to deal with the threats of global terrorism and enhance homeland security. This was characterized by a successful American military campaign to destroy Afghanistan's Taliban regime and interrupt the operations of the Al Qaeda terrorist network. In the aftermath of this successful mission, the United States military invaded Iraq due to its probable source of strategic surprise and the huge danger to U.S. national interests. The onset of the invasion was marked with huge debates regarding the continued use of international sanctions and the inspections by United Nation's arms to contain Iraq. The American military forces mainly targeted the Republican Guard and its armor, especially in attempts to advance into Baghdad. Through the use of airpower and ground troops, military successfully destroyed of the Republican Guard. However, the destruction of the Republican Guard proved to be costly mistake since it permitted foreign terrorists to enter Iraq and prolonged the war to nearly 9 years. Consequently, American ended up fighting a counter insurgency war in Iraq instead of regular military conflict. Despite of America's capture of Baghdad in the early stages of the war, the battle prolonged for 9 years because of the entrance of foreign terrorists and emergence of counter insurgency war.

On September 11, 1990, President George Herbert Walker Bush outlined the reasons why America had the duty to intervene in the Persian Gulf. On January 1991, the United States went to war in what was named Operation Desert Storm to stop the dictator Saddam Hussein, who had invaded Kuwait and was moving towards Saudi Arabia. President Bush believed that the United States, together with other twenty nations, had to put an end to inhuman behaviors and to aggressions brought upon countries by dictators. America had to maintain its role of economic power in the world and protect world’s precious resources such as oil. It was necessary to help Kuwait’s government by making Iraqi forces back down and leave the territory. In fact, Iraq was putting at sake the security of the Persian Gulf, and something needed to be

Military - Military power refers to the military influence a state has within the international sphere.

In August of 2002, the Bush administration’s position about Iraq had changed significantly. Prior to this point, the United States and other western countries had been arming Iraq with weapons of every type. The fact the United States and other countries had been arming Iraq with weapons, shows how little they considered Iraq to be a threat. This quickly changed. A debate on invading Iraq, held by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, created