The Hanging By George Orwell Rhetorical Analysis

Quote 1: "Do anything to me!" he yelled. "You've been starving me for weeks. Finish it off and let me die. Shoot me. Hang me. Sentence me to twenty-five years. Is there somebody else you want me to give away? Just say who it is and I’ll tell you anything you want. I don't care who it is or what you do to them. I've got a wife and three children. The biggest of them isn't six years old. You can take the whole lot of them and cut their throats in front of my eyes, and I'll stand by and watch it. But not Room 101!" (1984 Orwell, Book 3 Chapter 1)

George Orwell once said, “freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear”, that, essentially, “speaking the truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act”. (“George Orwell”) Orwell’s words reveal his political views in the absolute truest form. His uninhibited writing style forced readers to not only to listen what he had to say, but to also recognize his writing as the truth. Although his veracity was supposed to be accepted without question, Orwell defined oppressive ideas of the government by exposing elements such as class division, and the failed attempts of the middle class to establish a meaningful union with the working class. Through his symbolic storytelling in

In the excerpt, Orwell uses the rhetorical device of repetition in order to create suspense. For example, right before the rats are going to attack, Winston says, “‘Do it to Julia! Do it to Julia! Not me! Julia! I don’t care what you do to her. Tear her face off, strip her to the bones. Not me! Julia! Not me!’” The repetitive screams for help from Winston reveals the tone as he is frantically begging for mercy. Another example of repetition is used is when Orwell writes, “To think, to think, even with a split second left--to think was the only hope” This reveals the tone as it reveals Winston only has a split second to save himself from the rats, and he must be able to think fast in order to do it.

George Orwell wasn’t very religious but sincerely cares about the well beings of others. For example, in the story Orwell says, “I had never realised what it means to destroy a healthy, conscious man… the unspeakable wrongness, of cutting a life short when it is in full tide”. In this quote the readers can clearly see Orwells opposition of the death penalty. He believes that no one should be put to death from commiting a crime. Orwell puts a high premium on the lives of people and we can see that when he says the man is healthy and conscious. When Orwell says the man's life is in full tide he means that the prisoner is in the prime of his life and it is wrong to cut it short. Orwell is such a popular writer than many people have published their own analysis of “A Hanging”. One specific interpretation on isomd.wordpress.com stood out to me because it agreed with my own analysis and explained things very clearly. The article states that in “A Hanging”, “the subtle use of words for description is what carries his narrative, not evidence”. We can see this interpretation in Orwells strongest argument when he states, “I saw.. the unspeakable wrongness, of cutting a life short…”. The subtle word used for description in this quote would be unspeakable. Since Orwell does not use actual evidences to persuade his readers he instead uses pathos in the hopes to make the reader feel as he did during the

Political press can play such crucial role in the viewpoints of citizens; with an impact like this, it is essential to have explicit information. George Orwell’s 1946 essay “Politics and the English Language” he argues that Politicians have manipulated the English language, thus making their points euphemistic. He explains that these that, “...it is broadly true that political writing is bad writing” and results to a politician being “unconscious of what he is saying” (Orwell). Even though this essay was written in 1946, Orwell’s six basic rules are still broken. For instance, Donald Trump’s immigration speech is prime example of what Orwell would conclude as “nonsense”. The speech breaks the elementary rules by using unfamiliar phrases,

Due to George Orwell’s many successful works, he has remained a recognizable and respected author from his first moments of fame until now. Orwell’s novels and essays touch on aspects of government and human nature that will always remain relevant. With America’s changing values and controversial times, Orwell’s warning seem more relevant than ever and prove that with strong ideas, a novel can remain current beyond lifetimes.

Through his cleaver use of language techniques and word selection, Orwell evokes the reader's sympathy for the prisoner's struggles. He repeatedly shows that the prisoners are treated like animals. In the opening lines of the essay, the setting is described immediately highlights the inhumane conditions in which the prisoners are contained in. We notice this when the author is describing the cells, he states, "we are waiting outside the condemned cells, row of sheds fronted with double bars, like small animal cages" (Orwell 93). It is evident again when he is describing the way it took six guards to escort the prisoner. He says "it was like men handling a fish which is still alive and may jump out of the water" (Orwell 94). "The sprouting moustache, absurdly too big for his body" (Orwell 93), and "a puny wisp of a man" (Orwell 93) suggests malnourishment and neglect among this prisoner, but the reader can infer that this treatment is spread out amongst all the prisoners. In contrast with this sickly man, he describes the prison guards as "tall Indian warriors"(Orwell 93) and even describes one guard in particular as a "fat Dravidian" (Orwell 94). The details of these well-fed men in comparison to this ill man fuels a feeling of sympathy towards the prisoner. He provides these details to evoke sympathy for the prisoner to prove that killing a man is unethical.

In George Orwell’s "Shooting an Elephant" and "A Hanging". The setting of both the spots was in Burma, a nation in Asia. In "A Hanging" the setting was principally in a correctional facility while in "Shooting an Elephant was in a Moulmein, in lower Burma where an Elephant went 'quiet '. The Characters in "A Hanging" were for the most part a Hindu who was little whit no hair and obscure fluid eyes, additionally he had a thick, mustache which was humongous for his body. Additionally George Orwell played a character in the story however he was the storyteller furthermore there were six superintendents. The utilization of hues in both stories was for the most part yellow and chestnut. The yellow was utilized to recognize the general population 's shade in "Shooting an Elephant" while in "A Hanging" it was utilized to apply a picture of the climate and setting of the prison. Chestnut in "A Hanging" was utilized to recognize the men, "cocoa quiet men were crouching". Chestnut in the other story was utilized to apply a setting 's vibe. The opening line in "Shooting an Elephant" was "IN MOULMEIN, LOWER BURMA, I was despised by extensive quantities of individuals the main time in my life that I have been sufficiently critical for this to transpire". In "A Hanging" the opening line is "It was in Burma, a soaked morning of the downpours". I feel that the opening sentence of "Shooting an Elephant was a great deal more powerful as it shows a result of an intriguing approach to depend

Perhaps orwell wrote this political essay as a form of explaining why the events in Animal Farm and the Russian Revolution were able to happen. He explains how power can be so easily taken by manipulating others with just words. Orwell's purpose for " POlitics and Language" was to criticize politicians for using these methods as a form of manipulation; he also uses this essay as a form of advice to politicians. We know what his artistic purpose was, for animal farm, and what his political purpose was too. He was in fact successfull in fusing these 2 in his novel. In Orwells political essay he stated, "But one can often be in doubt about the effect of a word or phrase..." The author is saying that one can be so unaware of what words can do to people. Or how words can be a weapon. In Animal farm he showed how just words based on lies gave power to one. Totalitarism grew from these lies. Using Napolean, from Animal Farm, Orwell was able to represent the effect totalitarianism has on a

As we reach the end of the essay, Orwell’s clever message of being trapped by a system is made equivocally clear through his literary techniques of repetition and a cyclical structure as the man is hanged but the

One of Orwell’s distinctive characteristics is his emphasis of his emotional response to life and death in every situation. Orwell engages readers in his pieces because they feel

The writer implies the prisoner’s humanity by describing his emotions and ability to reason. After the execution, the Eurasian boy tells Orwell when the prisoner found out he would be hung,“ ‘he pissed on the floor of his cell’ ” (Orwell 102). The boy’s story signifies the prisoner’s human characteristics through his reaction, as he was so scared he urinated on himself. As John Rodden notes, this happening creates sympathy (73). The action humanizes the prisoner, connecting the readers to him. Likewise, George Orwell details the condemned man’s human-like traits by describing the prisoner avoiding a puddle directly before his execution. This simple act causes a realization that the prisoner is also human. John Rodden states, “The narrorator reinforces this point by drawing attention to the prisoner’s humanity, as he-a dead man walking-diligently sidesteps a puddle” (72). Rodden suggest that the “dead man” still has dignity to sidestep the puddle. The illustration of the prisoner’s response to his death sentence and his avoidance of the water brings to the reader’s attention that capital punishment is taking another human life.

The thesis of the essay is that writing was Orwell’s inevitable and irresistible destiny, although shrouded by his attempts to abandon it. It had always been inexorably and intricately woven into his person, manifesting itself first at 5 or 6, and then ultimately impressing itself on his life with irrevocable and fulfilling finality.

In any account written by an author, real or fake, there is always a deeper goal—whether it is to persuade, inform, or just simply entertain. There is always some meaning at its heart. Sometimes, however, messages become swayed and it becomes difficult to recognize the author’s intentions in writing. Sometimes his or her stance is unclear, however—though one side could be strongly argued. “A Hanging” by George Orwell is a prime example of this type of work, as the 1931 essay provokes thought on the issue of capital punishment. The story details an experience Orwell had during his work in Burma in which he was present for one prisoner’s execution. There is certainly conflict within Orwell for taking part in this event, and for being in relation to the functionaries responsible for carrying out the sentence. While Orwell does not make his belief on capital punishment clear, there is fair reason to argue that he is, in fact, an abolitionist. This is due to his possible usage of the prisoner to represent the inhumanity of the death sentence, an excitable dog portraying the event through the eyes of an innocent creature, and the irony of the workers’ humorous words in contrast to the stark sobriety of the day—however, Orwell’s supposed objective, though strong, also comes under scrutiny in its effectiveness.

In order to keep the reader engaged with his essay, Orwell uses his past to create situations where the reader empathizes with his younger self. He does this by making sure to stress the emotions he felt during his