The Hashtag Activism

Technology is being used all across the globe in everyday life. With the development of technology, the development of social media became very popular. In “Small Change: Why the Revolution will not be Tweeted”, Malcolm Gladwell stresses that “real” revolutions do not depend on social media to be resolved or started; however, small revolutions can depend on social media or networking. Although Dennis Baron is sending the same message in “Reforming Egypt in 140 Characters?” there is one point that Baron makes that differs from that of Gladwell’s; Baron actually believes that a game changing revolution can occur with the use of social media.

Black Lives Matter movement spread awareness through protesting, petitioning, writing formal letters to local police departments and the District Attorney of the United States. However social media is what helped draw attention to the ongoing violence against the black people. Hashtags, Instagram photos, and videos drew a broad and nonverbal attention to police wrongdoings. Social media helped as it makes up effective communities by uniting those that support the social action. “Social media keeps advocates and allies informed, as well as create a quick and easy vehicle through which to keep activists informed and how social media creates verbal opportunities for a solid change”. (Langford, Montené, 2015).

One of the main arguments in Malcolm Gladwell's "Small Change" is that social media has a huge impact on activism positively and negatively.In the 1960's it took 10s of thousands of people to come to make a change like the sit-ins but now with twitter and facebook, people just have to group together and contact the network they want, to make changes.It's a lot safer to get a point across on social media then taking the risks people took back then to get a point across. Social media has no real sense of authority so they don't make as much of a movement as the N.A.A.C.P did. With social media comes no organization or structure which causes false information to be passed around. In the end, both types of activism have their positive and negative

We see brutality everywhere, we approach a problem with the easy way out, violence. That's the solution we all resort to when we see no change or when we feel that the injustices that have been done are too much to go unanswered for. Civil rights activist Cesar Chavez published an article claiming that nonviolent resistance has always been more beneficial than violent protest. Chavez’s purpose in this article is to advertise the negative effects of violence and provide a solution for it. In his article Chavez uses an inspirational and objective tone to illustrate how the effects of nonviolent resistance over time outweigh those of violent protest, he creates an appeal to emotion, logic, and authority to persuade followers of God, minorities, and people who have suffered injustices that have gone unanswered for. Chavez uses many rhetorical devices, the most prominent being: repetition, rhetorical questions and allusions to explain why nonviolence protest is better to accomplish their efforts.

Malcolm Gladwell’s article "Small Change: Why the Revolution Will not be Tweeted" raises a significant question about the prospective contribution of web-based social networking to the advent of progressive social movement and change. Gladwell bold declaration that "the revolution will not be tweeted" is reflective of his view that social media has no useful application in serious activism. Contrasting various elements of the “high-stakes” lunch-counter protests in Greensboro, North Carolina in the 1960’s with the “low-stakes” activism achieved through social media, Gladwell concludes that effective social movements powerful enough to impose change on longstanding societal forces require both “strong ties” among participants and the

Name: Instructor: Course: Date: Rhetorical Analysis essay “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted.” In his article “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted.”, the author, Malcolm Gladwell presents the readers his rhetorically effective arguments regarding the socio-political question why social networks cannot be an efficacious instrument in arranging such fundamental changes in the life of society as revolutions.

I see people with ideas, great ideas, so many ideas that they all become convoluted and it just seems like a bunch of people uselessly shouting. In order to gain real traction and create real reform there needs to be an agenda, a goal in mind. I know that there is an ultimate goal, end racism, but there is no plan to achieve that goal. A goal to attain your goal if you will. I don’t agree with the mob mentality of some of the protests I’ve seen and certainly don’t agree with rioting. Once you lose sight of the plan and start to just go with the flow, you need to rethink the plan. It only takes a few to influence many. Which is why it is important to establish a goal and figure out exactly why we’re shouting and not just shouting. We as Americans, not just African Americans, can make real change possible with the right ideas and mindset. Patience is another key factor when you are wanting to make change on a national level. Things just don’t happen overnight. Dr. Martin Luther King spent many years fighting racial segregation, sparking ideas and making moves that changed the way a nation thought. And he did it

Malcolm Gladwell’s article "Small Change: Why the Revolution Will not be Tweeted" raises a significant question about the prospective contribution of web-based social networking to the advent of progressive social movement and change. Gladwell’s bold declaration that "the revolution will not be tweeted" is reflective of his view that social media has no useful application in serious activism. Contrasting various elements of the “high-stakes” lunch-counter protests in Greensboro, North Carolina in the 1960’s with the “low-stakes” activism achieved through social media, Gladwell concludes that effective social movements powerful enough to impose change on longstanding societal forces require both “strong ties” among participants and the

Although such protests are considered inconvenient, they publicize minority views. They compel people to stop, listen, and think. The public can better form solutions when people are aware of the issues at hand. Then, the people can vote to amend or create a law more fitting to modern

In the reading “Small Change : Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted,” Malcolm Gladwell discusses the act of four brave college students and their act of social activism. The four freshmen from a local all black college sat down at a counter in a diner near Greensboro, North Carolina and were denied service because of their race. The students refused to leave and instead started a protest there at the restaurant. The numbers of people protesting with the four young men increased as the story spreaded across states. The story of the sit in was done without the use of any technology or social network. Gladwell discussed the effectiveness of the sit-in because of the relationship between

On page 21 of the textbook titled Keeping the Republic: Power and Citizenship in American Politics written by Christine Barbour and Gerald C. Wright, the definition they provide for hashtag activism is as follows: A form of political engagement that occurs by organizing individuals online around a particular issue, and summoning them to act in concrete, real world ways. I felt the connection between the two was that the President decided to tweet his theories to the world about his campaign, possibly being infiltrated, which after reading the definition for hashtag activism in the textbook makes me believe that this is just a vindictive version of something that was supposed to be

“Arm chair activism” is effective activism. Twitter hashtags, specifically, are effective in engaging both the local and global community, allowing for increased awareness of different causes. Moreover, this online activity allows “everyday” individuals to engage in activism and helps individuals that may not have the time nor the resources to engage in “traditional” forms of activism (i.e. marching, boycotting, etc) to take part in helping to generate positive change. Both “arm chair activism” and “traditional” forms of activism are valid, but both have their pros and cons. For example, while “arm chair activism” is a good means of raising awareness and engaging the community, it is easy for individuals to become detached from the causes they are supposedly

In summation, we looked at social conflict as it related to class, race and ethnicity, gender, and how it explains the Black Lives Matter Movement. As we examined the literature, we asked how and why did the Black Lives Matter Movement begin? What are the problems with the Black Lives Matter Movement? What does social media have to say about the Black Lives Matter Movement? What is the youth’s culture’s input on the Black Lives Matter Movement? How does the Black Lives Matter movement tie back to the police? And where are we going with the Black Lives Matter Movement post-2016? We focused on whether or not the Black Lives Matter movement had the potential to affect change and have a long-lasting impact on society as a social movement. Therefore,

As a logical consequence, Postmes and Brunsting (2002) reasoned that the Internet is changing society because people's cognitive processes, triggered by access to information and communication, replace the strong social ties that traditionally underpin committed activism. In simpler words, in the past, humanity used the herd instinct as the main driving force behind committed forms of activism. Thanks to the Internet, we climb another step or three on the evolutionary ladder, and simply do away with the herd instinct and replace it with reason. The argument, if put this way, does not sound particularly strong. What can be taken away is that social media is still evolving, that social media changes the way we – or most of us communicate, that social media is used in social and political activism, and that the Internet increases quantitative if not qualitative access to information.

According to Dictionary.reference.com, activism is the policy or action of using campaigning to bring about political or social change. A huge campaign that is well known across the world, the Civil Rights Movement, was brought about by Martin Luther King, Jr. King risked his life everyday to ensure justice and equality for the African American race. “Small Change” by Malcolm Gladwell gives insight on how activism is more effective than social media, especially from one scenario at the Woolworth’s lunch counter in Greensboro, North Carolina. Gladwell points out his strong belief of what activism can do for a society rather