The Hatch Act of 1939 Essays

President Chester Arthur issued these rules [1881]: "First: No person in civil service shall use his office, his official authority or influence, either to coerce the political action of any person or body to interfere with any election. Second: No person in the public service shall for that reason be under any obligation to contribute to any political fund or render any political service, and he will not be removed or otherwise prejudiced for refusing to do so."

In 1914 the Smith Lever Act which placed farm agents in every county in the U.S. The Smith Hughs Act in 1917, which granted federal money to states to create agricultural courses in high schools. And in 1929, the Agricultural Marketing Act was passed which created the Farm Loan Board. This Board was made to grant low interest, long term loans to farmers only.

The 1970s began a more active era of campaign finance reform. The passing of the Revenue Act of 1971 allows citizens to contribute one dollar to a presidential candidate’s campaign fund by checking a box on their federal income tax returns. Along with the Revenue Act of 1971, the Federal Election Campaign Act was also passed in 1971. This law institutes disclosure requirements for federal candidates, political parties, and political action committees of donations more than $100. This law also sets a spending limit of $50,000

Such as the Pendleton Civil Service Act that passed on January 16, 1883. “This act was passed in response to the discovery that Post Office officials and stagecoach operators had come up with a plan to steal millions of dollars from the United States government” This act also helped establish the Civil Service Commission. As a result, the merit system was created. Government jobs were now given based on the person’s ability to do the tasks, instead of given as a reward for political loyalty. (Sheppard Software

To add to the complexity of USERRA’s application in the Federal workplace, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) regulation provides additional, non-USERRA required benefits to service member employees when performing certain types of military service.

What are the most important limitations on presidential control of the federal bureaucracy? What are the benefits and problems with granting federal bureaucrats discretion in the implementation

8. Pendleton Act-It stated that federal employees do not have to require contributing to campaign funds nor be fired for political reasons. It suggested that government jobs should be awarded based on merit.

*Founding fathers left holes in voter qualifications, giving the states power to determine who could vote (George Washington went out fishing while these decisions were taking place)

The political appointees faced termination, resignation, isolation and were working to force their “management by stark terror” tactics on their employees. Ann Grouch’s hit list that was released by a congressional committee was a true violation of the Civil Service Reform Act. According to the United States Office of Government Ethics website, the laws specify that “Ethics officials should be alert for possible violations of the criminal or civil statutes or the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch. When ethics officials find evidence that an employee has violated an ethics criminal statute or regulation, they must refer that evidence to the appropriate authority for action. Depending on the circumstances and the legal authority at issue, an executive branch employee may be imprisoned, fined, demoted, or fired for violating an ethics provision.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA) contains a number of prohibitions, known as prohibited personnel practices, which are designed to promote overall fairness in federal personnel actions. 5 U.S.C. 2302 (2009)

To combat too much political influence from advertising, the federal government passed a law called the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) or as it’s more commonly known, the McCain-Feingold Act. The BCRA sought to expand disclosure on soft money and changed some limits on hard money. The key piece of this legislation is the electioneering communications statute, or section 203. This piece of BCRA was intended to limit the influence of PACs by restricting their ability to air advertisements right before elections. McCain-Feingold prevented corporations and PACs from showing political commercials sixty days before an election and thirty days before a primary (FEC BCRA 90).

In a democratic society, it is imperative that all elected officials and public administrators be held accountable for their actions. For this reason, acts such as the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), sunshine laws, and sunset laws have been implemented into our government system. Sunshine laws are acts which require certain legislative meetings and proceedings to be held in public, therefore increasing accountability. This allows the public to see some of the activities of the government and allow it some openness. Sunset laws add another variable to this by giving these government agencies a termination date. These laws ensure that bureaucracies are being examined to a certain extent. These examinations must be thorough and precise in order to comply with sunset laws. Sunset laws have a way of holding legislative officials specifically to a higher standard.

Employees may go to one of these political arouses in lieu of answering to work. Managers are regularly left pondering whether they can make disciplinary move against workers who miss work to go to such a rally (Szwarcberg, 2012). The issue gets especially touchy if the motivation behind the political rally is to impact enactment that influences representatives ' rights as specialists, for example, arouses with respect to the country 's laws.

There are five major areas which trigger privacy matters in the area of public sector employment: background

Everyone has seen news headlines when someone is caught in a multi-million dollar scam. The public takes note when the government spends $400 on a single hammer or $660 on a toilet seat.[4] But what about Joe M. Ployee who takes a few pens or pencils or other office supplies home from his job at the Department of Labor? Or the city engineer who runs personal errand in his government vehicle during work hours? It is possible that these employees didn’t know they were committing FWA. Education about these transgressions must be an essential part of any training for public employees, elected, appointed or hired.