The Hierarchy Of Command Based On Rational Legal Authority

Weber talks about modern bureaucracy in both the private and public sector as having specific principles that they need to have. Weber said “ First, it is based on the general principle of precisely defined and organized across the board competencies of the various offices. These competencies are underpinned by rules, laws, or administrative regulations.”. Essentially Weber was saying that in order for a modern bureaucracy to exist in either the private or the public sector there has to be a rigidly defined division of labor of a particular bureaucratic system that clearly states or identifies the tasks and duties to be performed, it has to have an established chain of command that has the capacity to coerce others to comply by rules and regulations, people with certain qualifications and certifications are hired which helps to execute the assigned duties assigned to them in a timely and efficient manner. An ideal Weberian model has several characteristics that can be noted in the past and can be see in today’s beaurocratic systems, particularly in larger scale systems. The roles in these ideal systems are very specialized and career oriented with a systemic salary structure. The recruitment for these roles are very competitive and is based solely on merit, there are uniform principles of placement, promotion, and transfer in an administrative system within a hierarchy that holds the people within it accountable. The authority within these systems are impersonal, the rules

Max Weber was a German sociologist who first described the concept of bureaucracy, an ideal form of organizational structure. He defines bureaucratic administration as the exercise of control on the

What is a bureaucracy? Tolbert and Hall (2009) describe in the text, a large formal organization with the characteristics of having, a division of labor, a hierarchy of authority, a set of written rules, resources that are clearly separated from home and the organization, and group of members who are appointed according to qualifications (P. 22). These were the key elements Max Weber, a German scholar described for an ideal type of bureaucracy.

The term bureaucracy was coined by a well-known sociologist named Max Weber in 1947. He used this term to describe corporations that held five main characteristics. These characteristics include, hierarchical authority structure, a division of labor, written rules, written communications and records, and impersonality and replaceability. In the modern day world, it is easy to see several bureaucracies in place, however, one bureaucracy that is personally close to all Grand Canyon University students is the institution of Grand Canyon University (GCU). This is a great example of a bureaucracy due to the fact that it embraces all five characteristics of a bureaucracy.

critiques is that the new forms reflect not the “end” of bureaucracy but a complex,

Bureaucracy is able to act independent from the president and Congress, and has quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial powers. The size of the federal government has been debated in every presidential election for the last 35 years. Some people think that the bureaucracy has grown too large and too powerful. Americans sometimes get frustrated with the slow process of bureaucracies. For example the DMV is a place that most people dread having to visit. Between long lines, endless paperwork, and employees who don’t always know what they’re doing, the whole process can be rather

Bureaucracy has existed ever since the establishment of the NHS, 5th July 1948. There have been many attempts to reform the NHS, yet the issue of bureaucracy still exists. The NHS aims to provide free healthcare to all to the point of free delivery. It also aims to care for patients and keep improving their services so that the NHS can remain efficient. However, we see in our day to day lives that this is not the case.

Prompt: To what extent will people ignore their consciences to obey the orders of authority?

Some have seriously misinterpreted Weber and have claimed that he liked bureaucracy, that he believed that bureaucracy was an "ideal" organization. Others have pronounced Weber "wrong" because bureaucracies do not live up to his list of "ideals". Others have even claimed that Weber "invented" bureaucratic organization. But Weber described bureaucracy as an “ideal type” in order to more accurately describes their growth in power and scope in the modern world. His studies of bureaucracy still form the core of organizational sociology.

The environment and the state of affairs in which Max Weber developed the theory of bureaucracy were different from the present welfare states. Modern states are complex and difficult to maintain thus the validity of bureaucracy is questioned in the face of these challenges.

Weber states that organizations regulations are formed by few people and this people are the boss, administration employee who tends to have representation powers (Roth and Wittich, 1968). Weber states that the state tends to use bureaucracy on its people in order to establish authority. Bureaucracy is present in various areas in the environment and once bureaucracy is produced then it becomes difficult to

It was also Weber who began studies of bureaucracy, and whose works led to the popularization of this as a term. He developed theories of leadership, and how as society and organizational structure have changed over time, leadership techniques and organizational structures corporations adopt have adapted accordingly. Weber identifies three types of leader: the charismatic leader, who instills a sense of energy and eagerness among their team members. He is dedicated to his organization for the long run to produce adequate results. Secondly we have traditional authority, which is legitimated by the sanctity of tradition. The ability and right to rule is passed down, and is often often hereditary. But bureaucracies are typically led by the rational-legal leader, leading to a rise in this type of authority in recent times. This rational-legal will establish a clear structure within their organization, and follow procedures as they have been established, perfectly tying in with instrumental rationality. Bureaucratic leaders

Weber’s bureaucratic approach focuses on the importance of hierarchy by putting great emphasis on the use of rules, procedures and making impartial personnel decisions when managing. He put great emphasis on the jurisdiction, explaining that work should be “divided according to type and purpose” staying within the correct working unit just as the organization’s rules and laws would state (Milakovich, et. al., 2013, p. 146). A hierarchy would be established with a chain of command clearly identifying a system of super- and

While he highlights a lot of positives, he also saw a lot of issues within bureaucracy. Webers’ bureaucracy is a bottom line model that values calculable decision making over all else. Within this model are the people, or parts, that can be replaced if they cause a decrease in productivity. The issue becomes that the rationalized view of bureaucratic systems is unable to see individuals and respond to individual needs. There is a format and if someone does not fit in, or if they begin to fall behind, there is no understanding or support. His argument is that the bureaucratization of our world has made it depersonalized.

Based on this right, the bureaucracy designed by Weber has clear division of labor; thoroughly indicated hierarchical relationship and pointed out impersonal relationship (Crozier, 1964). In the course of history, there have been various more perfect organizational systems, therefore, bureaucratic theory was questioned and criticized by many scholar. However, there are still certain organizations that use bureaucracy theory to design the corporate structure despite many critical views.