The treatise “The Good Wife”, was written as a guide by an old and wealthy French man for his young wife, to teach her how to be the most honorable woman she could be even after the author’s death. There is an unspoken hierarchy depicted in “The Good Wife”, between three distinct relationships: God and humanity, husband and wife, and the employee and servant. In each section there is a comparison of ranks, such as god over humanity, the husband over the wife, and the wife above her servants, particularly in that order. Even though this hierarchy is evident, each level has its similarities and difference with a position either below or above it. Opening the treatise, the author explains the wife’s duty when it comes to serving god. He states …show more content…
God is the guide and is thanked for people’s survival during this time. God is prayed to for every minor aspect of a person’s life, from waking up to their everyday decisions. No matter if you are a noble, a man, woman, or servant, God is above all and is highly exalted. As explained in section 2.3, the servants are expected to treat their noble women the same manor. She is the spectacle that pays them, allows them to work and live on her land. While God is thanked for all of humanities blessings, the noble women is praised by her servants. The gentlewoman’s word was their law, such as it was for the words of God from the Bible to humanity. God protects humanity, and shelters them from the faults of the land as explained in the multiple prayers the author wishes for his wife to say. Through praying to God, and acting upon his word humanity is protected. The noble women’s relationship with her servants is much similar to that of God’s and humanity. The noblewomen must act superior, and choose what becomes of her servants. While God shelters humanity from sin, and preserve them with second chances, the noblewomen shelters, pays, and even dictates what her servants eat. The more one praise God, the more they are expected to receive, such as the more one praises their noblewomen the more they expect to receive. The husband illustrates this in section 2.3 when he explains to the …show more content…
Humanity must be as obedient to god as the wife is to her husband. As humanity has to follow God’s commandments, in section 1.6 the wife is expected to follow the husband’s commandments. As the author mentions in section 1.1 of the wife’s duties when it comes to God, these duties are also similar to her duties to her husband. While the wife is instructed to by her husband to praise and God daily, the wife is also instructed to obey her husbands every whim and must never disrespect, show arrogance or show disharmony for her husband such as Sarah never did for Abraham. The Husband uses Abraham’s and Sarah’s relationship to suggest that even the Holy text does not allow this type of behavior and that it is highly offensive to both the husband and God. The author goes to the extent to compare husbands as the head of the wife, to Jesus who is the head of the church. Their must also be a mutual respect in the relationship between God and Humanity, and the husband and wife. As humanity and the wife is expected to respect their counterparts, the same is expected from their counter parts. However, instead of through praise and constant obedience, the husband is only expected to love his life with his heart and no more. The wife’s obedient and affection to her husband is expected to be much more radical. The author compared this type of obedience to a domesticated animal.
The Wife of Bath uses bible verses in “The Wife of Bath’s Prologue.” Further, she employs the verses as an outline of her life to find reason in God to justify her actions. Nevertheless, the purpose of the verses differs within each stanza of the poem. The Wife of Bath is a sexually promiscuous, lustful, and manipulative woman. She marries men one after the other as they get older and die. In order to combat and overthrow the speculation and criticism being thrust upon her by societal norms because of her marriages, the wife turns to specific bible passages to find reason in life and support for her actions (Article Myriad.com). When the wife is having sex quite frequently and with different men she is said to be fruitful and multiplying. According to the wife, this is what she is told to do in the bible passage, which she has misinterpreted. Ironically, The Wife of Bath is using a predominantly male dominated book to back up and support her reasons for women being equal to men (Article Myriad.com). Not only has she referred to the benefits of adultery through the bible, she has also attempted to undermine the power of men in the very same way she has attempted to prove that the genders are equal. From this, it can be interpreted that although the wife claims to be providing evidence for women being equal to men, she is actually saying that women are better than men. She misinterprets the readings of the bible and male written passages on purpose in order to suit her needs.
“She wishes she had asked him to explain more of what he meant. But she was impatient…to be done with sewing. With doing everything for three children, alone…” (1125, 3), and “Respect, a chance to build. Her children at last from underneath the detrimental wheel. A chance to be on top” (1124, 2) both reveal the motives behind getting married to this man, despite the religious conflict. She is torn between the pros and cons of this new life. It’s although she is trying to convince herself, but the negative thoughts just keep surfacing.
In Good Wives: Image and Reality in the Lives of Women in Northern New England 1650-1750, Laurel Thatcher Ulrich details the roles and lives of women in Northern New England from 1650-1750. Good Wives is a study in role definition and of day to day, season to season, and year to year life of women during this time. Ulrich not only answers the questions what ii meant to be a “loving mother”, and “obedient wife,” and a “friendly neighbor” – an idealized epitaph of the time – she answers the questions of what did women do day to day, season to season, and year to year? “What were the concrete realities of their lives in northern New England?” And “how did these differ for men?”
Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.” Belleville claims that the latter part of this verse refers to a rift in intimacy between man and woman (34), and not consequence that suggests hierarchy. Although she acknowledges, like many do, that this text is descriptive and not prescriptive, she still tries extremely hard to remove any hint of hierarchy from the text, which appears to be a stretch. Although I agree with her that people should not use this text as justification for hierarchy (35), I think she is stretching to claim that we do not find hierarchy taking place due to the
As illustrated in A Husband’s Defense, women were dominated by men. From birth until death their lives were dictated by their fathers and husbands. In a civilization famed for its democracy, women were voiceless. Throughout the entire testimony, Euphiletus wife is
Here we face a paradox, physically that is impossible, but spiritually they complete each other's life so that in marriage, they are one. We also see throughout these lines that she gives her marriage as an example "If ever two were one", "if ever man were loved by wife", "if ever wife was happy in a man". Compare with me ye women if you can. In this verse the poet seems boastful of her relationship; she calls out to women in a bragging manner.
The Virtuous Woman loves her children deeply, while O-lan has chosen to strangle her daughter after giving birth out of love for her family. O-lan does this because her family is struggling to feed themselves. Another example that contrasts them is how The Virtuous Woman’s husband prasieth her meanwhile, O-lan’s husband has a second wife due to the amount of money he has. He has enough money so he bought himself another wife. Their husbands are opposites, O-lan’s husband works on the land while The Virtuous Woman’s husband sets at the gates and watches. ‘Her husband is known in the gates, when he sitteth among the elders of the land.” This quote means her husband does not work for a living, he watches the other men work for a
Women have just as many responsibilities as men, which are sometimes overlooked and thought of as nothing. Women are known to be domestic women, especially during the 1950’s. Women are supposed to make the man/head of the family job easier in any way. There were three women in the Younger family, Ruth Younger, Walter’s wife, who is responsible for the Younger’s apartment. She loves her husband, God, and cherishes her morals. She does her best to make sure her family is taken care of. Then there is Beneatha Younger, Walter’s sister. Beneatha is the eccentric one, one who wants to break the stereotype of what women should do and become educated. Beneatha’s mind is far from being a domestic wife. Joseph Asagai, who courts the attention of Beneatha recognizes her desire for knowledge and nicknames her, “Alaiyo” or “One for whom bread- food- is not enough.” All of her knowledge causes her to criticize God, which is a big no, she tells her mother, “Mama, you don 't understand. It 's all a matter of ideas, and God is just one idea I don 't accept. It 's not important. I am not going out and be immoral or commit crimes because I don 't believe in God. I don 't even think about it. It 's just that I get tired of Him getting credit for all the things the human race achieves through its own stubborn effort.
Foh utilizes ontological equality and subordination to determine the coequal status of women. With specific relevance to the eyes of God, the hierarchical structure of gender roles is clearly delineated. For example, ontological equality is described as demonstrating that men and women were created equally in the image of god. However, functional subordination is the characteristic value that women should be subservient to men in social roles. (Professor Guynn, lecture 16) In her description of Genesis 1, She describes that Adam and Eve are equal beings as they were formed at the same time. Dislike the interpretation of gender hierarchy, Susan logically transits the inequality to her meaning of equality. She reclaims that women and men share the equal image of God. Both women and men play the same role in human society and culture. In this respect they are equal in God’s image and eyes. On the other hands, Functional subordination arises in terms of the dependence that Eve has on Adam having come from his body. This leads to their separate roles where Eve may follow Adam’s leadership. She emphasizes on God creates Eve as a helper. The only difference are their functions, not gender. Since men and women are regarded as husbands and wives. Men should show his function on being responsible for his wives, while women are dependent on their husband. She culminates her discussion with the idea that a hierarchical free system cannot be comprehended and therefore, some
Because the Lord values the relationship of a man and his wife, he also gives us instructions as to how husbands and wives are to treat each other through Paul’s teaching in Ephesians 5:21-33. The subject of Paul 's teaching in Ephesians 5:21-33 is that of submission in the context of marriage. Paul 's instructions here create a clash with the beliefs and practices of our culture today. However, a closer study of what God really intended sheds much light on what is really being taught in this hard saying of Paul. Paul is talking about the different roles the both the husband and wife has with each other in relationship with their relationship with Christ.
Now, we must look at where and how human relationships tie in. We’ve talked an awful lot about man. What if we bring woman into the picture? How exactly do they fit together? Well first of all when we look at scripture we see that it is written, “Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man” (Gen. 2:22). This conveys a few truths. First of all, woman was taken from the side of man. This would mean, A, she is to be equal to and treated as so for she was taken from man’s side. B, she was taken from man to be his helper. And C, she was to be his wife and as it is stated soon after, “For this reason a
The rigidity of gender norms and gender roles is analogous to those in the New Testament and provides insight on how the society present in the story uses religion to present women as a monolith. Due to biblical expectations, women are constrained from making autonomous decisions, thus forcing them to follow a moral code. In the bible, women are groomed to become child bearers and “pure” wives (Titus 2:4-5), an idea shared in the book. This promotes them as having no sense of self-ownership, which objectifies them as characteristics, not humans with nuanced emotions nor ideals. An example of this is Purisima del Carmen. After she got married, Purisima’s teaching career ended quickly because of
The church’s interpretation of the women is that the husband is the head of her and she should be subjected to him (The New American Bible, Ephesians 5: 22-24). In the wife of bath, her fifth husband was questioning his wife, because of all what was written of bad wives by men (Wife of Bath, pg 699). The Thousand and One Nights is centered on a good king who was deceived and hurt by his wife, which twisted his morality. He vowed to marry a woman each night and in the morning he would kill her. The king’s daughter, Shahrazad, decided to take a stand and marry the king. With her intelligence and storytelling, she was able not only to save her own life, but her kingdom as well (The Thousand and One Nights, pg 554). Shahrazad was a good wife even if it meant risking her life. Men has an impact on his wife. Yes, he is superior to her, but he needs to bring her to holiness and reciprocate her love. Husbands love your wife as much as you love your own bodies (The New American Bible, Ephesians 5:28). Make sure your wife lacks blemish and bring her to holiness and without blame
The Bible is controversial on the matter of gender equality. There are numerous contradictions about the status of women in Christian society. Historically, the most prominent interpretation has been rather negative toward women. The Christian Church, with principally male authority, emphasizes the idea that women are inferior to man. They focus on Eve’s sin leading to a punishment that “her husband will have authority over her.” (Drury, 34)
He stipulates that man must love give himself to his wife, as Jesus gave Himself to the Church.