The High Quality Data Gathering System Essay

By 2001 it was brutally apparent that the U.S. Health Care system was in dire need of a reform in regards to quality and patient safety. Following two separate reports issued by The Institute of Medicine (IOM), To Err is Human (1999) and Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health Care System for the 21st Century(2001) the U.S. Congress requested the IOM review quality processes across multiple government funded health care programs. And understandably, “these reports described America’s healthcare system as a tangled, highly fragmented web that often wastes resources by duplicating efforts, leaving unaccountable gaps in coverage, and failing to build on the strengths of all health professionals” (Brown J., p. I – 15, 2013). Thus, the Committee on the Quality of Health Care in America released 6 aims to address key dimensions that require improvement in our health care system. These aims propose that our system needs to strive to be more Safe, Effective, Patient-Centered, Timely, Efficient, and Equitable (STEEEP). All of which were created to help overhaul our current health care system and, more importantly, narrow the quality chasm.

Better quality health care will affect the life expectancy rate and the expenses. Patients expect doctors and hospitals to deliver the best possible care. The major issue with the quality of health care is “medical errors result from faulty systems… not individuals” (Hughes). In order to ensure patient safety and positive outcomes, hospitals have to assess for themselves the various different aspects they need to improve on. For example, hospitals could have a shortage ranging from staff, medication, or equipment. Through universal health care, “doctors… can focus on patient care”, which will aid in improving treatments for each individual (White). Along with this, there will be more government funding to improve hospitals as a means to help patients. Countries under universal health care coverage have a better quality of care, while the “United States [is ranked] last overall” (“Right to Health Care”). These benefits of medical treatments of universal health care are vital to American

The IOM Report Brief is a significant revelation that indicates where the US healthcare delivery system lacks in offering quality care to every in the US. This report not only discusses the problems in the healthcare system but also presents recommendations as to how the government can improve it. This paper examines as to what the progress is made in the field of healthcare after this report was written.

Though the spending has lessened in recent years ,when compared with other economically developed countries the cost of the health care in U.S is much higher and ranks poorly on quality indicators (Burke & Ryan, 2014).Evidence suggest that patient quality outcomes not generally correlated with variation spending .Beneficiaries are expected and deserved for high quality care within affordable

Hospitals in the United States offer top quality care to its citizens but regrettably not everyone receives equal access to this care. There is an alarming difference between qualities of care received by some population groups relative to other population groups.

falls short compared to other countries stating that our annual deaths due to medical errors are in the tens of thousands (Filson, Hollingsworth, Skolarus, Quentin-Clemens, & Hollenbeck, 2011). They view this lack of quality of care as depending on what provider you see and where. The United States compared to other countries is in last place when it comes to mortality rates and quality of care (Davis, K, et al, 2014). The authors go on to say that the millions of people who are uninsured and those who are considered to be under insured only add to the gap of quality because these individuals do not have access to basic health care and this also adds to the $130 billion spent on those folks who are not insured or that do not take advantage of preventative

In 1998, the United States devoted 13% of its economy to health care, and this figure rose to 16% by 2008. However, despite this rise in government expenditure on health care, outcomes for patients remained the same (Obama, 2016). The quality of the health care system in general was not great; health care

A highly effective healthcare system is highly dependent upon the ability of all people to receive reliable care that meets all needs. In addition to this, the quality of the healthcare system should be backed by the best scientific knowledge available. However, a closer introspection into the structure of healthcare in the nation reveals that there is big gap with regards to the overall performance of healthcare. In comparisons to

Berwick, D.M. (1996). Quality of health care: Part 5: Payment by capitation and the quality of care. The New England Journal of Medicine, 335(16), 1227-1231.

The Quality Chasm report underscores the lack of quality healthcare, cost concerns, poor use of information technology, absence of progress in restructuring the health care system, and the underutilization of resources (Stevens, et al., 2006). The quality issue that this writer has chosen to address is the poor use of information technology. According to the Quality Chasm Report, health science and technology have advanced at a very rapid pace, but due to poor use of information technology, the healthcare delivery system has not maintained delivery of high-quality healthcare services. Research results are not translated into practice, and practice lags behind knowledge (Stevens, et al.,

United States has no dearth of highly qualified, well-trained doctors and still the US healthcare quality fails to meet the established industry benchmarks. Institute of Medicine’s (IOM’s) 2001 Report, “Crossing the Quality Chasm”, clearly states that the American healthcare delivery system is in need of a pivotal change. (Committee on Quality of Healthcare in America (Institute of Medicine), 2001). The exasperation level is continuously rising amongst both, the patients and the providers, and yet the problem of delivering and receiving high quality care remains unaffected. In order to address this problem of healthcare quality improvement and affordability, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA or Obamacare) was signed in

Definitions of the quality of medical care are no longer left to clinicians who decide for themselves what technical performance constitutes “good care.” What are the other dimensions of quality care and why are they important? What has changed since the days when “doctor knows best?”

Our lesson and textbook readings this week list quality, efficiency, and cost as three of the drivers of high performance healthcare systems (CCN, 2017; Mason, Gardner, Outlaw, & O’Grady, 2016). Do quality improvements projects equate to higher healthcare costs, or do they decrease costs by reducing adverse outcomes and readmission rates and increase efficiency? Do reductions in cost translate to a reduction in the quality of care? It is with good reason that Hussey, Wertheimer, and Mehrotra (2013) state that the connection between the quality and cost of healthcare is one of the most debated subjects in healthcare today. In their systematic review of 61 studies, the authors found only a small to moderate relationship between quality and

Quality measures are strategies that gauge, evaluate or compute health care processes, results, discernments, patient insight, and administrative structure. In addition, quality measures are frameworks that are connected with the capacity to deliver first-class health care and/or that are able to identify with one or more quality objectives for medicinal services. These objectives include: compelling, protected, effective, quiet focused, impartial, and opportune consideration. Quality measures can be used to measure quality improvement, public reporting, and pay-for-reporting programs specific for health care providers (CMS.gov, 2016). There are an assortment of quality measures in which health care organizations can use to determine the status of the care they are delivering. Many are appropriate, but few are chosen for this research paper. Among them are: National Health Care Surveys, Hospital IQR Programs, Scorecards, and Political, Power, and Perception/Data for Decision-making tools.

The health care system in US is the topic of much debate. There have been many surveys done on patient satisfactions and the efficiency of health care provided by the doctors. One common finding is that we have a long way to go if we want all our citizens to get quality health care services. Here, we will see how United Healthcare which is one of the largest health care groups in the US is working towards that goal.