The History of Titile IX Essay

Great inequalities in the educational system between the sexes have occurred for many years and still occur today. Efforts have been made to rectify this disparity, but the one that has made the most difference is Title IX. Passed in 1972, Title IX attempted to correct the gender discrimination in educational systems receiving public funding. The greatest correction it made was in the area of athletics, but social justice of Title IX applies to many other areas as well. Title IX has an effect on women who are not athletes in many ways, including quality of education, receptivity to education, empowerment and creation of ideals.

Then, in a 1984 decision, Grove City v. Bell, the U.S. Supreme Court gutted Title IX. In that ruling, the court said Title IX did not cover entire educational institutions - only those programs directly receiving federal funds. Other programs, such as athletics, that did not receive federal funds, were free to discriminate on the basis of gender.

On June 23rd, 1972 IX was created to prohibit gender discrimination in the nation’s educational system. In athletics Title XI governs the overall equality of treatment and opportunity while giving schools the flexibility to choose sports based on student body interest, geographic influence, budget restraints, and gender ratio (bailiwick). In other, words the focus is on the women to have equal opportunities as men do. To determine if an institution is in compliance with Title IX they would have to pass a three-prong test. The three-prongs to this test are,

In 1972 Congress passed the Educational Amendments. One section of this law, Title IX prohibits discrimination against girls and women in federally funded education, including in athletic programs. Since its arrival, in regards to athletics, there have been arguments for and against the many aspects pertaining to this law. Title IX has had a large impact on high school and college athletics in the attempt to give females an equal opportunity, but the means by which they are achieving this goal is an ongoing debate.

     Title IX did much more than what the average mind thinks of when they hear the words: Title IX. I personally was interested in what people thought of when they heard this and did two simple interviews, one of my grandpa’s, a 73 year old man, and also interviewed my friend, Samm, who is a 19 year old female who just recently

This past June marked the 40th anniversary of Title IX, a United States law stating that no person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Although the wide spectrum in which Title IX covers includes many educational issues, its application to NCAA athletics has especially been confounded, because, unlike most educational institutions, athletic programs are gender-segregated by sport. In terms of intercollegiate athletics, Title IX essentially states that that all academic institutes of higher education are

Since Title IX, women have had incredible career opportunities and have been diversifying the workplace since receiving the education that was not offered before ("Career”). Women are constantly breaking boundaries set in the past as now many women make up the fields of career and study that were thought to only be for men (Musil). In a 2006 study researchers found that women made up thirty three percent of lawyers and also made up twenty seven percent of doctors ranging from pediatrics, general family medicine, or internal medicine practice (Musil). Title IX specifically states that schools are not allowed to shut down courses or refuse courses to women legally if they receive federal funding from the government.

The problem is not with the general law of Title IX itself, which simply states that any education program receiving federal funding cannot discriminate based on gender (“Gender Equity” 339): it is the way that this law has been enforced. Although the entirety of the Title IX law pertains to a number of aspects of educational institutions, a college’s compliance requirements (that is, the rules that must be met in order to be in conformity with the Title IX law) under the athletic portion of Title IX boil down to three major “prongs”: 1. The proportion of female

When it comes to Title IX most people just think of it as something that lets women play sports, or they just don’t know what it means. According The United States Department of Justice website, the definition of Title IX is “a comprehensive federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program or activity. The principal objective of Title IX is to avoid the use of federal money to support sex discrimination in education programs and to provide individual citizens effective protection against those practices.” It also mentions that Title IX applies to the traditional educational institutions like colleges, schools and universities, but it also applies to and education and training program operated by the use of federal finances. ("Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.") The Title IX law came into effect when the president signed it and made it a law on June 23 1972. ("Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.") Title IX is a law that allows both genders to have equal opportunities when it comes to things like education, sports, and financial aid. Before Title IX women did not go to college or have a chance to go to college. Culture just expected women to stay home and not care about education. Title IX allows women the opportunity to further their education and go into jobs that are mostly run by men. ("10 Key Areas of Title IX.") The Title IX law intended for equal opportunity for men and woman and to avoid

In 1972 congress passed the Education Acts of 1972, Public Law No. 92-318, 86 STAT. 23.J. Better known as Title IX, the law states “No person in the United States shall, on a basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under any education program receiving federal funds” (Dusenbury & Lee, 2012). To interpret the law, it states the areas of federally funded education where schools must comply. These areas include any staff member that discriminates the opposite sex, any athletic programs that don’t provide equal opportunities towards both genders, and employment, such as an all-male staff is not allowed (20 U.S.C., 2012). These acts are punishable by loss of federal funding and

The policy does not provide resources or funding, but it does provide amazing opportunities. The equal opportunity to attend school without gender bias, both for the schools they chose as well as the subjects they desired, was a huge cultural change for women. However, the component that was most beneficial and controversial was athletics. Football was at the top of all discussions (Ware, 2007). Clearly, it is the biggest item in a school’s athletic budget (Ware, 2007). Was football going to suffer in order for girls/women to have equal opportunity? (Ware, 2007). In 1979, regulations offered institutions three different ways to show athletics were compliant with Title IX (Ware, 2007). It was often called the three-prong test. They had to

Despite the fact that the major emphasis and repercussion of Title IX focused on the areas of intercollegiate athletics, the original document did not mention athletics. However, every person should be entitled to the equal right to participate in sports, despite the color of their skin, social status, or gender. Sports build character and emphasizes the values of teamwork, perseverance, and hard work. In the area of athletics Title IX

Women have been on the search for gender equality since the passing of Title IX in 1972. The original 1972 law states that “no person in the United States shall on the basis of sex be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance” (UCSC Title IX), later in 1987 the benefits were extended to all educational institutions, governmental entities, and private employers who accepted federal funds (UCSC Title IX). Although forty years have gone by since Title IX was initially passed, women are still fighting a daily battle for equality in the employment field. Women have made great strides in terms of the careers they

The law reads: “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” Federal funding does not have to be monetary compensation. Examples include rent assistance, financial aid/loans, or federal training. Title IX came after Title VII or the Civil Rights Act, which does not allow discrimination in the work place

People are constantly making mistakes and avoiding certain responsibilities. Mainly minor responsibilities can be avoided and unanswered, but major ones need to be questioned and brought to attention in order for them to be dealt with. Sex discrimination is one of those mistakes that people are constantly making. It isn’t happening as much as it used to in the past, but it is still occurring in our education system, employment, housing, and even in something as small as credit. There are large episodes in past time that we are able to track down and see examples of sex discrimination towards females, especially in education. From as early as birth, women are being discriminated against just because they are supposedly inferior to men. This was all put to a stop when Title IX was formed. Title IX’s main objective is “to protect people from discrimination based on sex in education programs or activities that receive Federal financial assistance. The motto that we follow is “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance”.