preview

The Holocaust, Part Two: The Final Solution

Decent Essays
Open Document

The article “The Holocaust, Part Two: The “Final Solution” by History.com is about the “Final Solution” which was a plan the the 3rd reich created to exterminate all jews. This article is a balance between Objectivity which is based on facts and subjectivity which is based on opinions and feelings. Other people might say that this article is a lot more objective and subjective. The article “The Holocaust, Part Two: The “Final Solution” by History.com is a good mixture between objectivity and subjectivity.

The article Shows plenty of Objectivity By adding many different facts about the “Final Solution.” My first piece of evidence is, “Beginning in 1941, Jews from all over the continent were sent to Poland. They were forced to live in restricted city sections called ghettos.” This shows Objectivity because this is a non biased proven facts. My second piece of evidence is when it said, “On July 31, 1941, one of Hitler's top commanders wrote of the need for a "final solution" to "the Jewish question." The Nazi leaders came up with a plan to kill the Jewish people.” This was another unbiased Claim …show more content…

My first piece of evidence is, “This was a disturbing sign of the coming Holocaust.” This is a biased opinion because most Germans at that time thought that it was a good thing that these laws and death camps were put in place. My second piece of evidence is when it said, “This lack of action was likely due to a focus on winning the war.” This has no fact to back this claim up it was just a theory that a lot of people choose to believe in. My third and final piece of evidence is when Jewish writer, Primo Levi wrote, “We lay in a world of death and phantoms.” This is subjectivity because this is what he believed life was like in the camp others might of had other opinions on the matter. These pieces of evidence show that it wasn't just objectivity but also subjectivity included in this

Get Access