preview

The Holy Crusades

Better Essays

INTRODUCTION

Over the years many stories have submerged about the Holy Crusades and have raised many questions about the motives that drove those crusades in the first place. To understand the Crusades one must understand the force behind them. Christianity took its roots in Palestine and over the centuries found its way within the Roman Empire and gained ground rapidly. While Christianity was taking shape, the church had to deal with the many threats that it was facing from within. After the church was deeply planted in Europe and Asia Minor, a new and more radical religion arose in the Arabian Peninsula, Islam. Over in Europe in the early days of the church many Christians saw themselves as soldier of Christ, spiritual soldier deploying …show more content…

Led by king Louis VII of France and Conrad II of Rome, the second crusade did not accomplish anything and was a complete failure. After the death of the Muslim’s leader Nur Eddins, Salah Ed-Din one of the latter general became his successor. Salah Ed-Din also known, as Saladin was a fearful and remarkable leader for the Muslims, within a few years of his reign he managed to annihilate the entire army of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. Saladin represented a great threat for the European, so Europe responded by mounting the third crusade. King Philip II Augustus of France, King Richard “the Lion-Hearted” of England and the Emperor Frederick Barbarossa came together and launched a big scale invasion on the Muslims, the third Crusade. The third crusade is the most famous crusade ever; most Hollywood movies when trying to depict the crusades pay a particular attention on the third crusade. With the rise of Pope Innocent III to power the crusades had gained more ground because Innocent III was very interested in crusading. Innocent III wanted to launch a fourth, unfortunately the seventh crusade failed before it could even began. The seventh crusade was redirected to Constantinople. The crusaders captured the city and ransacked it. Pope Innocent III soon after the failure of the fourth crusade began preparations for another crusade, but died before it got under way in 1217. The fifth crusade was kind of …show more content…

After all the research that I made and tried to understand the motives behind the crusades I concluded that the crusades were purely political and religiously incorrect. The cause of Christ had nothing to do with the crusades as a matter of fact the crusades represented the total opposite of what the Christ was preaching. The Bible can be one of the most dangerous tools if misused and abused, just like a gun is dangerous in the hand of someone who does not have the proper training on how to handle it so is the Bible. The crusades were the inventions of ambitious men who wanted to gain more riches and power. Most of the European population was either illiterate or did not have a good understanding of the scriptures when Pope Urban II used their ignorance for his own stupid political gain. In the Holy Scriptures it is written in Hosea 4:6, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected knowledge...” as a result of those unfounded wars the Muslims and Christians could never found a common ground nor live together. Both side had endured great lost that could not be easily forgotten, the mistrust and the enmity between Christians and Muslims is still being felt in our

Get Access