preview

The House I Live In Analysis

Better Essays

The House That Scratches the Surface With only five percent of the world population, the United States manages to hold twenty-five percent of the world’s prisoners, with a majority being incarcerated for drug crimes, with a disproportionate majority of those individuals being African-American. Eugene Jarecki’s 2012 documentary, The House I Live In, attempts to analyze and explain the far reaching causes and consequences of American drug policy on communities, individuals, and the country. This is done through multiple personal stories and the intertwining history and policy that have shaped their lives. The House I Live In is squarely directed at those who are in acceptance of the status quo regarding drug laws and offenders in this country. …show more content…

The House I Live In is not an in-depth, technical examination of US drug policy that is approachable by only those who have prior knowledge of the issues covered, that would likely make for an utterly unwatchable documentary. No, instead Jarecki presents an a wide-ranging overview of the so-called War on Drugs and its history and impact on the nation, with special focus given to the African-American community and the devastating effects the drug war has had on it, all through a variety of personal …show more content…

There was a clear effort to get them in there at the end, but only at the end. Putting them at the end could have served a promotional purpose, by allowing the organizations to say “Hey we’re here, this is what we do and this is how people help us” but instead they are only presented as another commentator for the documentary. Again, with Jarecki’s clear message of “US drug laws need to change” it would seem that he would want The House I Live In to, in a way, help direct people to organizations advocating for that change, which the film does not do. It simply presents them, and then moves back towards Nannie Jeter’s (albeit moving) story to end the film. The ending does not promote further action, it may be a moving and heartfelt way to end The House I Live In, but it fails to engage the audience to do further research or get involved to change American drug policy in some way, which is what the film is really advocating for. If the advocacy groups had been brought in sooner, and stuck around to the very end, Jarecki could have been more effective in his messaging for change, but, he again falls short in this aspect

Get Access