The Ideas Of Kant And Cosmopolitanism

Nationalism, a political or social philosophy in which the prosperity of a nation-state as an existence is considered supreme or more important than anything else. The primary duty and loyalty should be toward the nation-state. The love for one's country often reflected dominance and power as people were able to unite toward common good. Furthermore, republic governments were reestablished a result of Nationalism.

Nationalism has been extremely important and influential in shaping the modern world we see today, causing revolutions, rebellions and the constant reshaping of world maps continuing even today. Its appeal is something that I don’t believe will diminish in the future. Many theologians and political commentators alike agree that Nationalism has perhaps been one of the most prominent political ideologies of the modern world “No single political doctrine has played a more prominent role in shaping the face of the modern world than nationalism” 1, and doesn’t look like ceasing to be as influential anytime

Nationalism inspires a pride within a group of people that ignites change and strengthens unity. It is what keeps heritages and cultures of nations alive. But what happens when the people advocating Nationalism are trapped within a nation in which they do not desire to be? The Pan-Slavic movement in Eastern Europe in the early 20th Century created a tension between Austria-Hungary and Serbia that culminated in

Nationalism was formed with the idea that a nation is made up of people who are joined together by common language, customs, cultures and history. It held the belief that one should be loyal to the people of their nation, not a king or empire. Nationalists believed that people of a single nationality should unite under a single government. The concept of Nationalism emerged in the French Revolution and was spread to the rest of Europe by Napoleon’s conquests.

Nationalism has played a crucial role in world history over the past centuries. It continues to do so today. For many, nationalism is indelibly associated with some of the worst aspects of modern history, such as the destructive confidence of the Napoleon’s army and the murderous pride of Nazi Germany. Large numbers of people, descent in their hearts, have carried out unbelievable atrocities for no better reason than their nation required them to. Authoritarian and totalitarian regime have crushed dissent, eliminated opposition, and trampled on civil liberties in the name of the nation.

Everyone has a different idea of how nations were first created and what characteristics are required to call something a nation. It is personal because everyone has a different world view – the fundamental values, ethics, and beliefs a person ascribes to. This makes creating an over-encompassing theory of nationalism difficult. In this paper, we will be looking at different individuals throughout American history and what theory of nationalism they might agree with most.

Nationalism is the strong belief that the interests of a particular nation-state is of primary importance. It also is the belief that a people who share a common language, history, and culture should have an independent nation. Nationalism is shown in many ways throughout World War I, the Interwar Years, and World War II. It is shown in nationalists groups such as the KMT, through new ideas such as Nazism or Fascism, and during events that happen during wars and revolutions, such as the Salt March. Nationalism’s role is important in all of these wars and revolutions because without Nationalism, history would be very different.

Nationalism is a widely debated ideology that differs based on the historian’s definition. For example, Benedict Anderson attempts to define nationalism as "an imagined political community [that is] imagined as both inherently limited and sovereign"(Anderson, pg 6). Anderson also believes the main causes of nationalism can be

Nationalism has become one of the most powerful uniting-and occasionally separating-powers of the modern age. Throughout history, there were numerous countries that exemplified both sides of this classic European belief. However, as time has passed, this pride and promotion of one’s country has developed far beyond the scope of Europe. Nationalist feelings fester in all parts of the globe now, and with that comes more complicated expressions of the sentiment, as well as carefully crafted governments that exist for the sole support of nationalist fervor.

Nationalism is the idea that a people who have much in common, such as language, culture and geographic proximity ought to organize in such a way that it creates a stable and enduring state. Nationalism is tied to patriotism, and it is the driving force behind the identity of a culture. Nationalism had many effects in Europe from 1815, The Congress of Vienna and beyond. In the following essay I will describe many of the consequences of nationalism on European identity, as well as some of the conflicts that it created.

The principle of the theory of nationalism is all about being patriotic. Napoleon used this principle during his time and it is highly implemented by military today. Nationalism refers to being loyal and devoted to one’s

Nationalism is a sense of strong pride and loyalty of ones nation over other nations. This is different from past beliefs that pride and loyalty rests in religion. Its biggest strength was to cut across the social classes and motivate large groups of people. Stavrianos, 1999) Nationalism developed in the 1770’s gaining major support throughout Europe. The earliest signs of nationalism were found in England during the puritan revolution. England during the time of the revolution was becoming a leading nation scientifically and economically which they thought would change they viewed freedom. John Milton a major writer at the time defined this change in freedom as “celebrated for endless ages as a soil most genial to the growth of liberty.” (Encyclopædia Britannica Online, 2011) The French revolution had a major influence on the development of nationalism. French enlightenment thinker

Many philosophers around the world have studied Kant’s philosophy for years. Many of them were deeply influenced by his concepts and became so say “Kantians” (John Rawls, Ronald Dworkin etc.). There is also a notion of “Kantianism” which refers to a philosophical school based on Kant’s writings and the philosophies that have arisen from the subsequent study of his writings.

Nations are created by specific social forces which promote a sense of ‘nationhood’ among the population. Because of the diversity of the conditions, nationalism has manifested itself in different forms depending on the needs of the people. States are generally multinational, rarely purely homogeneous and are quite often polytechnic. In a nation state, patriotism, as a sentiment, plays a crucial role in legitimizing the political authority of the state. Nationalism has become synonymous with patriotism.

Nationalism can make a group fight fiercely for establishing its own sovereignty and could lead it to rule, that in itself does not reveal which of these nationalisms is ought to rule. Ultimately, the number of distinctive cultures and potential nationalisms are going to extinct, or become assimilated in the sea of the nation-state (Gellner, 2008, pp. 42-43). For Gellner, it is irrational to hold nationalism responsible for being forceful in homogenizing a people through its agencies which is under the command of nationalist movements. Instead, it is the typical prerequisite for nationalism as an educated, culturally standardized, exchange-capable and transportable population is what modern industrial states must have to operate successfully. In the light of the above, the main weakness of nationalism is that only a very small fraction of nationalisms attain their goals (Gellner, 2008, pp.