The Ideas of the Classical Theorists Particularly Those of Bureaucracy and Scientific Management, Are Generally Considered as Rather Old Fashioned and Out of Date, and of Little Relevance to Organisations Today.

As defined a bureaucratic organization is a type of management with a pyramid command structure. A couple bureaucratic agencies that everyone has used at least once in a lifetime is UPS or Federal Express. UPS and Federal Express being two very fast paced and competitive environments in the package delivery market they must strive to keep their customers satisfied with their service. Another comparison would be at Walmart, and Kmart is enlarged discount retailers that use different customer service

The text describes a bureaucracy as a large, complex organization composed of appointed officials. The departments and agencies of the US government make up the federal bureaucracy. The federal bureaucracy has 15 federal cabinet departments with about 2 million full-time employees. (Wilson et al, 290)

The bureaucratic era has been the traditional form of organization for more than a century, in simple terms described as hybridity, standardized operations and none flexibility inside the organization. The change to the post-bureaucratic is shown through personal influence, high trust relationships and the importance of the individuality of everyone (McKenna, Garcia-Lorenzo & Bridgeman, 2010). According to Kernaghan (2000) the characteristic of the bureaucratic era is “position power” and of the post bureaucratic “participate leadership”.

The bureaucratic model of leadership is based on the concept of fixed duties that are maintained through a hierarchy of authority. Max Weber (1800) believed that organizations had one critical weakness and that was closely interacting with employees and simulating a family or community like environment. He believed that the only way that and organisation could be run was by separating work and pleasure and ensuring that employees followed a stick code of conduct which would be enforced and managed by more trustworthy and higher ranking employees. However while prominent for over a century the bureaucratic management model has become scarcely used in the last few decades as more and more organisations seem to be gradually reverting to pre bureaucratic values. Organisations like Valve and Google have cause the diminishment of the

The fundamental of orthodox management literature is concerned with the efficiency and effectiveness of an organisation. It copes with several problems such as the classical and human relations theory, motivation and leadership. It also assumes that employees are a key asset as well as the society has moved to a Post-Fordism and post-bureaucratic approach. However, orthodox management is only concerned with how the organisation is behaving instead of why the business is conducting in a certain way. Another limitation is that the theory is merely a group of people’s idea so it is always contestable. In this essay, I will describe how the conventional management theory apply to today’s organisations; demonstrate the reality of work through

The classical or traditional approach to management was generally concerned with the structure and the activities of formal organization. The utmost importance in the achievement of an effective organization were seen to be the issues such as the establishment of a hierarchy of authority, the division of work, and the span of control.

Bureaucracy was one of the most popular theories developed and is used in some modern organisations such as the NHS and the Police. Through the years bureaucracy has developed a bad reputation for de-humanizing jobs (Grey, 30) “In the ideal-type, people are no more than parts in a well-oiled machine –devoid of passion, prejudice and personality”, although some people prefer this structure (Handy, 22) “No one, it seems, approves of bureaucracy except, interestingly, lots of people in organisations who like to know where they stand.”

Bureaucracy is a staple for the society we live in. the definition of bureaucracy defined by Max Weber is that is constitutes the most efficient and rational way in which one can organize human activity, and that systematic processes and organized hierarchies were necessary to maintain order, maximize efficiency and eliminate favoritism. We see this in our businesses, government, schools, hospitals, banks, and every aspect of our society. There are always hierarchies in every aspect of life that show us who is in charge and has the power, and the ones below them. This system brings order and puts people in place to have an efficient society. Commonly, bureaucracy shows the hierarchical structures in a negative light due to the absence of individual freedom of initiative and the overuse of delegation. “Bureaucracies generally reward compliance, not defiance. In bureaucratic settings, one does not typically advance by being the defiant, rugged, and fiercely independent individualist of American folklore, but by going along to get along, being a team player, following the rules and procedures, and slowly climbing the bureaucratic ladder one step at a time” (McNamee and Miller 2013:171-172). In the Film “Office Space” bureaucracy is shown in a company called “Initech”. The film is about a computer programmer named Peter Gibbons who is a rather depressed individual who hates his job. During the course of the movie Peter becomes fed up with the bureaucracy and so he

The classical approach to public administration was focused on finding the best way to perform and manage tasks. This classical approach to Public Administration is often associated with Weber, Wilson, Taylor, and Gulick. Under the classical approach was four areas of focus which was the Bureaucratic, Scientific, Administrative, and Managerial approach. Each area represented the four main theorists that the classical approach was associated with. Max Weber's bureaucratic approach focused on the rational-legal model which viewed bureaucracy from a rational view and argued that bureaucracy is the most efficient and rational way in which one can organize the human activity and that hierarchies are necessary to maintain

Since its early translations, Essay’s in Sociology (1948), Max Weber’s theory of bureaucracy has been used as a platform to study and understand the structures of an organisation, in service sectors. However, many societies have undergone significant change since the development of the theory, with the improvement of technology and globalisation, many view the bureaucratic model to no longer have relevance in contemporary organisational structure in the 21st century. The notion that a bureaucratic system can no longer be applicable to modern organisations is highly questionable, as many suggest bureaucracy will continue to be a fundamental part of any organisation, but, the application and implementation will adapt differently across the diverse range of organisations, even coexist with contemporary theories, such as post-bureaucracy.

From our point of view, the approach of managing of Genting Group Berhad is classical management. One of the theory in classical management is scientific management. Frederick W. Taylor played the dominant role among the earliest scholars of scientific management. According to Taylor, there is one best way to do any job. He suggested that specific procedures developed from thorough studies should replace the managerial actions based on rules of thumb.

The mechanistic structure is the traditional or classical design, common in many medium- and large-size organizations. Mechanistic organizations are somewhat rigid in that they consist of very clearly delineated jobs, have a well-defined hierarchical structure, and rely heavily on the formal chain of command for control. Bureaucratic organizations, with their emphasis on formalization, are the primary form of mechanistic structures. According to Max Weber, bureaucracy is a form of organization characterized by a rational, goal-directed hierarchy, impersonal decision making, formal controls, and subdivision into managerial positions and specialization of labor. Bureaucratic organizations are tall consisting of hierarchies with many levels of management. In a tall structure, people become relatively confined to their

In order to link the introduction with the topic, the background to these classical theories will be briefly outlined. Bureaucracy was described by Max Weber in his 1922 essay Bureaucracy, and according to Grey (2013), it is the kind of organisation which emerges from the complete application of the rational-legal principle is one which is entirely defined by rules and a series of hierarchical relationships. As for scientific management which is called Taylorism as well. It Works for each step in detail and the time required to design the most effective working methods, and for each work to establish a certain amount of work standards, be classified as a standard work process; The actions of men and time, in the most economic way to achieve the highest yield, so also known as mechanical model.

The history of management includes multiple theories and understanding them can help individuals identify the ideas their organization is built upon. Classical organizational theory encompasses several major approaches to management that continue to be influential even today. The early to mid-twentieth century included the introduction of many concepts of management theory such as scientific management, bureaucratic and administrative theory. Most of these early approaches revolved around control of employees and processes in order to achieve more

First, I will discuss the exemplary management theories that transpired around the twentieth century. These involve scientific management, which center of attraction was on associating per-sonnel and jobs to increase effectiveness; and administrative management, which center of atten-tion is on recognizing the principles that will impel to the beginning of the nearly adept structure of management and organization. Next, you have behavioral management theories which was estab-lished both prior and subsequently the Second World War, which spotlight was on supervisors should guide and supervise their personnel to optimize their effectiveness. Then you have man-agement science theory, which was current during the Second World War and which has evolved to be very