The Imaginary Institution of India

However, it is not the 18th century that nationalism began to be a recognized. Due it's overwhelming feeling of belong and sense of purpose. Nationalism is thought to be an ancient emotion; however, it's revolutionary because the American, and French revolutions can be linked to the manifestations of nationalism.

Nationalism is a sense of strong pride and loyalty of ones nation over other nations. This is different from past

Nationalism is the patriotic view of one's nations and to think the nations and or nation state is superior to another. The source given shows a viewpoint of someone who is vary patriotic almost showing a form of ultranationalism. This viewpoint presents the idea that one's identity should solely be formed by the nation they are apart of. Nationalism is not what should shape your whole identity. Areas of concern related to nationalism shaping identity is the conflict that occurs and animosity between two nations, inadequate amount of learning from other nations and forming the idea that your identity isn't only shaping by where you come from.

From the time you are young and learning about the 13 original colonies, you are exposed to Imperialism. Imperialism being a “mother country” who takes over another (or several) different, less powerful nations to collect more income, obtain more resources and spread their culture. About 300 years ago India was desirable because of their rich land for crops and the large population of people to work. India was so irresistible to the British that their rule over them lasted about 200 years, although they helped create a uniform government, develop a modern infrastructure and founded universities, it resulted in great damage to the Indians. Including, no control over their own government, destruction of beautiful, healthy land and millions of deaths.

Imperialism swept across the world following the Industrial Revolution as trade opened up transcontinentally and capitalism became the driving economy of Europe. England expanded its influence to Africa as did Belgium and France. A scramble for Africa occurred, with England fighting for dominance over China as well. As invasions and wars began in Africa, China dealt with the British opium trade and its effect on the Chinese people. Imperialism had varying effects on these different countries and continents. In Egypt and the Indian government, it evoked feelings of nationalism in the people for their native land. Resistance was another reaction from most countries as anger towards the Western powers built in the citizens of the imperialist states. Conversely, some people and governments saw opportunity in a relationship with England and attempted to take advantage of what England could offer their homelands.

Nationalism is an emotional loyalty towards one’s nation, sometimes including belief in the superiority of that nation, regardless of whether it is also an independent country. Nationalism was very prevalent during Big Era 8 and most of the 20th century. It gave citizens an excessive amount of confidence in their nation, government, and military strength. Nationalism was a significant factor to World War I, the Interwar Years, and World War II. It was largely predominant in Serbia during WWI, China during the Interwar Years, and Germany during WWII. As a result of many nationalistic ideas promoted by government leaders and individuals, Serbian, Chinese, and German nationalism effected the world in

Stories about the past delineates the future and “The Inconvenient Indian” takes this axiom and exhibits through the warp and weft of history why the stories we tell matter, mainly because Canada’s story commonly surrounds their tense relationship with First Nations people. Most Canadians’ knowledge of Native American histories, cultures, and circumstances is abysmal. This is caused by certain part of history being emphasized and other aspects neglected by people and secondary institutions that have become more dominant by the stories they convey about the past. When it comes to history, fact and fiction are recurrently intertwined. If history is just the stories about the past, and nothing more, Canada would not be what it is today.

Nationalism is, in the simplest of words, pride in your nation. Although, it goes deeper than simply being proud of who you are and where you are.

When Americans think of nationalism, most conjecture visions of high-flying flags, soldiers returning from war, and a montage of red, white and blue. Some envision fireworks on the Fourth of July, or a hometown parade on Memorial Day. To many, the term “nationalism,” is just a synonym for “patriotism,” or the emotional allegiance one feels to his or her country. But in fact, nationalism carries a wholly different meaning, one that has earned a negative connotation especially over the past few centuries. Nationalism, at its simplest is the patriotic sentiment for a nation, or aggregate of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, generally inhabiting a particular country or territory. Nationalism therefore implies the superiority of a homogenous group of people, whether it be by race, culture, language, etc. Over the years, nationalism has been used to justify, in some cases, the genocide of ethnic or religious groups that fail to fit the national mold of the majority faction. This justification has procured nationalism its unsavory historical connotation, which peaked in Europe during World War II and still remains healthy today in Africa and the Middle East.

There are many factors that can drive a country to imperialize another. Such as political motives, a need for resources, a want for rarities, probable economic growth, or simply a larger empire. For the most part though; most places practiced Imperialism in seek of resources, both as a necessity and want.

Nationalism is being proud of your country and it is something historically people have worked for a long time to have. The rise of nationalism reshaped the world in many way including both socially and politically by mid-nineteenth century (1800’s).

Nationalism is defined as “an extreme patriotic feeling marked by a feeling of superiority over other countries” but in terms of how nationalism makes someone act, that can be answered in two simple words: Greedy and prideful.

Although neither region experienced tremendous stability, the early states of China and modern-day India consistently followed their own styles of state-building practices. These powerful states in East and South Asia, respectively, used quite different methods of state-building, with their techniques greatly mirroring their different levels of desired interaction with outsiders. While the Chinese focused on state-building from within, the empires of modern-day India were more open to outsiders and their potential contributions to Indian society.

Before a discourse of the specified topic can be laid out, definitions of a few terms must be distinguished. Firstly, nationalism and patriotism are two distinctly different concepts that are often used interchangeably to represent a similar school of thought. By no means, are they mutually exclusive or unrelated ideologies, but nationalism and patriotism differ in their approaches to expressing love for one’s country, respectively. These definitions can be best understood on the shoulders of essayist and drama critic, Sydney J. Harris, “The Difference Between patriotism and nationalism is that the patriot is proud of his country for what it does, and the nationalist is proud of his country no matter what it does; the first attitude creates a feeling of responsibility while the second a feeling of blind arrogance that leads to a war (Harris, 1953).” While the latter definition may be a bit extreme, the general impression is still applicable. An understanding of the dichotomy between nationalism and patriotism, and how

However, nationalism does not have one single definition, its meaning has evolved as society changes and modernises. Nationalism can “...refer to any behaviour designed to restore, maintain, or advance public images of that national community” (Gries, 2005:9). By the mid-1960s there were two main proposals to understanding nationalism. “In the first, nationalism was an aspect of national history, a sentiment associated with the nation...In the second approach, nationalism was a modern, irrational doctrine which could acquire sufficient power...to generate nationalists sentiments and even nation states” (Gellner, 2008:xx). Nationalism is defined differently by different schools of thought and theorists.