The Impact Of Gandhi On American Society Through Martin Luther King Jr.

990 Words 4 Pages
Most Americans know little about Hinduism and few imagine that the values of Hinduism had any influence on the development of American society. But what little they do know of Hinduism is most likely derived from their knowledge of Mahatma Gandhi. Few Americans realize that Gandhi's teachings and life's work had a tremendous impact on the development of American society during the Civil Rights Movement.

Mohandas K. Gandhi, known to the world as The Mahatma, or the "Great Soul", brought a great gift to the modern world. That gift was the light of Non-Violence, of Service to the Community and of Social Justice. His life served as an example and this light became a torch which illuminated our world and which saved us from our own
…show more content…
This particular school was attended by and large by students who were the children of former ‘untouchables'.

"The principal of the school introduced me and then as he came to the conclusion of his introduction, he said, ‘Young people, I would like to present to you a fellow untouchable from the United States of America,'. And for a moment, I was a bit shocked and even peeved that I would be referred to as an untouchable.

"I started thinking about the fact that twenty million of my brothers and sisters were still smothering in an air-tight cage of poverty in an affluent society. As I thought about this, I finally said to myself, ‘Yes, I am an untouchable, and every negro in the United States is an untouchable.'" In 1959, Dr. King gave a sermon on the life of Gandhi in Birmingham Alabama. In that sermon, Dr. King says "The world doesn't like people like Mahatma Gandhi. That's strange, isn't it? They don't like people like Christ, nor do they like people like Lincoln. They killed Gandhi – this man who had done all of that for India, who gave his life and who mobilized and galvanized 400 million people for independence. One of his own fellow Hindus felt that he was a little too favorable to Muslims, felt that he was giving too much to the Muslims.

"Here was the man of non-violence, falling at the hands of a man of violence. Here was a man of love falling at the hands of a man with hate. This seems the way of history. And isn't it significant
Open Document