Institutionalism Institutionalism rejects neorealist claims that the international system is characterized by anarchy. Rather, it is more accurate to think of international system as made up of rational states that exhibit growing interdependence. Interdependence creates incentives for cooperation among states as it offers mutual benefits to all parties engaged. States learn cooperation through reciprocity or are forced to cooperate for sake of securing public goods. Institutionalists also focus
focus on the consequences of the United States’ foreign policy in the Middle East, with a focus on the impact those ramifications in regard to the United States’ policies towards the United Arab Emirates. To that end it is paramount to ascertain the challenges in alliance system, and to review important concepts of alliance theories and the scholarly works that have contributed to these approaches. Several articles have been written in respect to the alliance theories and the factors that motivated
Sinister Intentions? A Theoretical Review The two theories that will be contrasted against the work of the IADB will be post-colonialism and liberal institutionalism. Post-colonialism makes a strong argument for the ability of the bank to abuse the developing countries of Latin America, as well as predicting the very real examples of abuse from the bank on indigenous communities in the region. Liberal institutionalism explains how the IADB promotes the interests of all involved and actually helps
In Asia, the economic growth has been phenomenal and the deepening of economic integration and larger trade volumes have led to both developed and developing nations to experience steady economic growth, especially at 10.1% in 2007 (ADB, 2015). Nevertheless, especially with China’s economic slowdown, the Asian region is facing problems such as decrease in labor force, labor productivity, and overall trade growth (ADB Report, 2015). In order to consolidate economic integration of the region, the ASEAN