(2012). Fearless dominance and the U.S. presidency: Implications of psychopathic Personality traits for successful and unsuccessful political leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 489-505. Lilienfeld et al., (2010) examined the attentiveness of psychopathic personality traits that aligned with job performance and leadership of the past presidents including George W. Bush, whereas their successful or unsuccessful behaviors were a matter of public records. The description
traits for successful and unsuccessful political leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 489 -505. http://library.gcu.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.library.gcu.edu:2048/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=2012-19403-001&site=eds-live&scope=site In this article the authors have conjectured up some features of the psychopathic condition (e.g., fearlessness, interpersonal dominance) which are adaptive in
paper is to analyze three scholarly empirical articles on Leadership. Generally Leadership is the ability to influence peoples toward their achievement of objectives. A number of papers have been written on various aspects of Leadership. The focus of this paper would show a synthesis of three scholarly works on the topic of Leadership. The first article to be analyzed is of “Impact of Personal Growth Projects on Leadership Identity Development” by Odom, Boyd, and Williams (2012) whose purpose was
Synthesis Paper: Leadership RES -811 April 22, 2015 Leadership Paper This paper will create a dialogue concerning the following articles and synthesis them to generate a discussion of the common themes that run throughout them, as well as understanding the conclusion of all three articles when taken as one entity. Article 1: Fearless Dominance and the U.S. Presidency: Implications of PsychopathicPersonality Traits for Successful and Unsuccessful Political Leadership by S.O. Lilienfeld, I.D. Waldman
about leadership and how personality traits of a leader can reflect and affect his or her role. The first article was conducted by Liliendfel, Waldman, Landfield, Watts, Rubenzer, and Faschingbauer in 2012 titled, “Fearless Dominance and the U.S. Presidency: Implications of Psychopathic Personality Traits for Successful and Unsuccessful Political Leadership” whose purpose is to evaluate and measure the personality of the 42 U.S. presidents. The second article titled as, “Impact of Personal Growth
critical thinking skills. However, leadership also entails the ability to manipulate and understand the interdependence of organization function, knowledge, culture, communication, and technology. Researchers Lilienfeld, S. O., Waldman, I. D., Landfield, K., Watts, A. L., Rubenzer, S., & Faschingbauer, T. R. (2012) in their work, Fearless dominance and the U.S. presidency: Implications of psychopathic personality traits for successful and unsuccessful political leadership, review implications of psychopathic
accomplish this goal we integrate our gifted programming standards with the academic standards. We have specific student outcomes with which we use the academic content to accomplish. Student outcomes are grouped into four areas. Cognitive Growth and Talent Development Students benefit from meaningful and challenging learning activities that address their unique characteristics and needs. (Standard 1.6) Students become more competent and develop their abilities. (Standards 3.2 & 3.3) The interventions
postsecondary institution. Student leadership development is regarded as a priority at current higher education institutions (Boatman, 1999; Astin & Astin, 2000; Robert, 2003b). From the study, the researcher found that the relationship between student government with campus offices and administrators was horrible. Therefore, the study was to determine how college students perceived their role in student governance at their higher education institution. Main Body Leadership training program is becoming
The research project benefiting an area of leadership scholarship that I found was based on the theory of developing leadership. Becoming a leader over the past twenty years has changed drastically. Up to this point there is little knowledge about how leadership develops over time. Looking back at the industrial age many perceived leadership as achieving goals and increasing productivity. These attributes are more commonly associated with those of a typical manager. This type of leader-centric
that serve the common good. Graduate study in the field of nonprofit management focuses on the development of leadership skills for nonprofit managers and provides education in areas such as general operations, human resources, strategies, and fund development (Nachmias, 2008). Students of nonprofit management also develop proficiency in other matters such as nonprofit legal issues, organizational development, donor relations, financial management and fund-raising, volunteer, and human resource management