The Impact Of Science And Philosophy Of Science Essay

Science is an objective method used explain the natural phenomena of the universe. The practice of a scientific method provides a detailed outline that contributes to expressing how to determine if a theory is scientific. A continual cycle that emphasizes the techniques of observations, questions, hypothesis, prediction, experiment, and conclusion. The complications that arise when applying the scientific method to all theories is that science is subject to change; therefore, it is hard to modify extensive ideas to a few simplified steps. A scientific explanation depends on existing experimental theories to validate or disprove present and future logical arguments. This is because previous observations support abstract methods that may not be testable and the continual change is dependent on specific predictions and discoveries.

The general definition of science is the systematic study of the physical and natural world through observation and experiments. On the contrary, it is much more than that. Much like art, it holds a sense of subjectivity. It is an abstract paradigm that requires the input of one’s personal beliefs and values to help it progress. It is much more than just facts and theories of how the world works, but also a prime representation of the ethics and beliefs of the scientists that help mold it today. Science is a database for factual knowledge on the natural world, furthermore, it also incorporates the environment it has created. The environment consists of the particular people, behaviors, and struggles of the scientific community. Even though science incorporates many thoughts and ideas, it does not contain other ideas. Science does not hold a moral category. It does not define what is considered right and what is considered wrong. It merely provides information on certain ideas for further understanding. Any theories and applications of it can lead to other subjects. This idea also applies to what the acquired scientific knowledge is used for. Even though the ideas of complexity and subjectivity are present in both science and art, the concept of aesthetic should only be important for art. Despite requiring organization and general cleanliness, science does not need to pass the eye test. Science should be represented through proper data and its analysis and the non factual features need to have a rational reasoning. To judge or base an idea on its appeal does not equal to

What is science? A question everybody knows but only few choose to answer. A question that never goes out of style, a question that can trigger someone to jump off of the window for being the most “cliché” question that a teacher can ask. Name all those thoughts, but if we look on the other side of it, science had contributed a lot of things in the world and in our lives.

1.Chalmers, A. F., 1999. What is this thing called science?. 3rd ed. Indianapolis/Cambridge: University of

As a child Bill Bryson found science textbooks to be boring, he wanted to make it possible for adults to learn new scientific theories, developments and discoveries in one easy way. A Short History of Nearly Everything does just that, offering a concise, readable, entertaining summary of current scientific thinking, for adults. Within each section of the book specific topics are brought to mind, such as outer space, the Earth, and living things. Each chapter investigates a particular question much like “How did the Universe start?” or “What are supernovae and why are they important?” Throughout the book, Bryson explains the interesting and inspirational lives of historical scientists and recent researchers.

I had a problem, I had a big problem. I had to fix something very important before everything went wrong. 7 days ago I was sleeping when at the middle of the night suddenly a phone call interrupted my sleep. I answered it. A person with a monotone voice spoke to him, “Doctor Gregory, this is you correct?”.

Throughout the world’s existence, scientists and engineers alike have integrated the use of science and technology into every day life through the use of theories, hypotheses and experiments. In the period of time science has been present, it has left a more substantial impact on the world compared to technology, by improving and shaping the way the human race thinks, and by providing an environment and capacity for advancement.

Throughout time, science has had significant impacts on society. It has not only contributed to new ways of thought and understanding, but it has also advanced the human race. However, science has proved that it is a power that can lead to devastating consequences and because of this, western society’s attitude towards science changed from the 18th century to the end of the 20th century.

The inductivist account of science recognizes five steps which are essential to scientific progress. First, scientists compile a large body of facts from observation and experiment. Using the principle of induction, these facts can be generalized to form the basis for a theory or law. Then, once a theory has been developed, scientists can use the theory as part of a valid logical argument to make new predictions or explanations of phenomena. According to Chalmers, the inductivist account has “a certain appeal” to it, namely, that all of scientific progress can be seen as the result of five fundamental leaps of thought (54). “Its attraction lies in the fact that it does seem to capture in a formal way

The scientific revolution started in the 16th and 17th century with development of the scientific theories (Hatch, n.d.). These Scientific theories are detailed explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on knowledge that has been repeatedly duplicated through observation and experimental procedures. The understanding or the attempt to understand the human’s perspective of the world through scientific theories is the birth to the philosophy of science (Okasha, 2002). Several perspectives of scientific theories have been postulated by many on the history and philosophy of science. One of such is the Kuhn theory of science development postulated by Thomas Kuhn. His theory brought about a new perspective where

In basic terms, no single person can be credited for having developed the scientific method singlehandedly. In that regard, it can be noted that the scientific method has been refined and fine tuned over time by some of the greatest thinkers in history. In this text, I come up with a brief description of the method as well as its history. Further, I highlight the contributions made by a number of philosophers in the development of the scientific method.

Language represents human’s experiences and different fields hold different ways of language using. The language of science actively constructs scientific reality, i.e. a way of looking at the world, the roles assigned to readers and the way of organizing information (LING337-nominalisation). However, science may be presented diversely according to the different intended audience, purposes and modes. Three texts chosen in this paper are all concerned with the same scientific reality, but their language differs widely. The ways in which science are presented in this three texts largely depends on their audience, purposes and modes. To put it another way, language of science in the chosen texts

Science has, for centuries now, been a way to answer unknowns and change questions into answers. From the cause of seasons, to the human genome, science has made a huge impact on the world, in the way we function and think. Science has allowed the expansion of life across the globe, and allowed the fears, such as those of falling off of the edge of the earth, to be eliminated. Science exists only to answer questions that are hypothesized by the human brain, but sometimes science can be flawed. To be more accurate one must state that the problem is not with science being flawed, the long standing issue is the flawed scientist, and the nature of the human brain. The flaw in the human brain is feelings, and for the purpose of this paper, bias. Bias is almost impossible to control in one way or another, bias can be as small as liking green over red. For the purpose of this papers argument the bias is racial. Scientific racism is the use of science, most commonly ostensible science, to substantiate and justify racist philosophies and positions. Often these pseudo scientists would ignore and fabricate results and conclusions, to correlate positively with their hypothesis. These skewed results were then shared through scientific journals, with other intellectuals and then the public. Multiple forms of scientific racism were used in the 19th century to justify the social, physical, and mental disparities and abuse of minorities in America.

In the course of this semester, we have read a number of stories that have one common element: science. In most of the stories, the science was hypothetical, but accurate, for the time and usually played an important part in the story. Today we know that most of these ideas range from simply being wrong to flat out impossible. When I say science I am referring to the sciences that are of a physical nature such as biology, chemistry, and physics. Psychology is also a science, but one of a mental nature. The few books that we had that dealt mainly with psychology will not be dealt with in this paper.

Problem: You arrive home late at night. You walk up to the front door, unlock it, and reach in to turn on the light switch located just inside the front door. The light does not come on! Now what?