The Impact Of Technology On The Development Of Psychological Research

A while after receiving his doctorate, Milgram began studying the justifications of genocide, in particular the case of Adolf Eichmann. Eichmann was responsible for countless war crimes associated with the Nazis, however he claimed that him and all of his accomplices were simply following orders. A year after Eichmann’s trial, Milgram had set out to find the answer to his new found question, “Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?" (Milgram, 1974). It is this underlying question that supported the entire experiment, essentially a study focusing on the conflicts between obedience to authority and personal conscience. As in, would you harm a person if you were told to do so by someone with high authority? The experiments began in July of 1961, at Yale University, when Milgram began a search for participants, by publishing a short advertisement in a newspaper.

In Sherry Turkle’s “Stop Googling. Let’s Talk”, Turkle claims that “technology is implicated in the assault on empathy”(page 4, paragraph 3) . Through online conversations we are unable to make eye contact, hear and see the other person 's tone and body language. Because we are unable to see these things we are unable to comfort one another. Sherry Turkle further proves her claim that technology may be the reason for the decrease in empathy by performing a study. In this study Turkle, observes the behavior of teens at a “device-free” summer camp and after five (5) days, the teens were able to read facial expressions and were also able to identify the emotions of actors on a video-tape unlike their counterparts , whose devices were not taken away. These teens were able to tell how their fellow peers were feeling based on their tone and body languages. Moreover they were able to hold conversations in

Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, and other members of the community also questioned the nature of obedience. Milgram reflected back to the 1933 events of the Holocaust. Milgram began to question the intentions of the soldiers serving under Eichmann. Why would all those German soldiers go along with kill millions of innocent Jews, slaves, homosexuals, children, and gypsies? Were the soldiers just following the orders of Adolf Eichmann, leader of the German Army? Milgram was interested in doing the obedience to authority figures study because he questioned if Adolf’s men were just following his orders, and this lead to killing of eleven million innocent victims during the time period of the Holocaust. Milgram became enthusiastic in researching the limit that the average person would go to obey orders from their authority figures, even if that meant

Psychologist Stanley Milgram’s basis for the study was done to analyze the how’s and why’s of the Nazi regime during WW2. How could the common man perform the cruel atrocities act of genocide against the Jewish? Milgram’s theory was that people are generally persuaded to obey over presiding authority figures. Milgram asks a fundamental question as when he says “Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?” (Milgram, 1974).

Gary Taylor Psychology Essay On, The Milgram Experiment Stanley Milgram conducted the first of a series of very famous psychological experiments In 1961 that was created to gauge people’s level of obedience to an authority figure. What happens when you put a person’s conscience against the orders of an authority figure? In the words of Milgram, “Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders?” His setup was fairly basic.

Stanley Milgram, a Yale psychologist, conducted a classic study obedience in which the participants were forced to either violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands (Behrens 343). Milgram's study suggested that under a special set of circumstances the obedience we naturally show authority figures could transform us into agents of terror (343). His experiment showed that normal people could be influenced to the point of administering great amounts of pain on another human being, just because a person in a position of authority told them to do so (343). A theory that was reached as a result of Milgram's experiment was that "it is easy to ignore responsibility when one is only an intermediate link in a chain of action" (355). Milgram's results offer a possible explanation as to why the Nazis did what they did. Even though

In the argument article written by Dr. Alex Pattakos entitled “The Meaning of Friendship in a Social- Networked World.” He clearly defines his reasons for believing that technology is, in his opinion, ruining the concept of friendship. One of his main supports is the ancient Greek philosopher, Aristotle. Other supports include, percentages and personal experience. Together with good example and persuasive skills, he composes a great article.

A Yale University psychologist named Stanley Milgram started a research experiment that investigated the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience (McLeod, 2007). This study was conducted in response to the Nuremburg Trials in Germany, as German officials had claimed they were just following orders that were given to them by their superiors. Milgram formulated the experiment so that it could answer the question: “Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?" (Milgram, 1974). However, the objectives of this experiment were not achieved. The objectives were not achieved because the act of shocking a person cannot be compared to the genocide the Germans committed during WWII. Also, Milgram wanted to study whether the Germans were more obedient to authority figures, but he

Before we evaluate the role of technology let us take a moment to discuss an example of research taken from a time when resources were limited to what was available. Stanley Milgrams ‘obedience study’ in the 1960’s (Banyard, 2012) played a significant role in the historical timeline of Psychological research however, the very nature of his work raised many questions about the undue stress it caused to participants. It was those questions that heightened the awareness of ethics in research and constituted the necessity for more creative studies. Even Charles Hofling et al. (cited in DE100, Chapter 2, p.85) (a) attempt at replicating Milgrams

Technology has their difficulties, it has made communicating default and made us degrade our friendships. Henry David Thoreau says, “Society is commonly too cheap. We meet at very intervals, not having had time to acquire any new values to each other.” our communication with people are weakened by technology, but it gives us connection with other people. Although it goes that it helps us communicate with people it has produced a demeaning value of friendship and overlooks the ethic of friendship.

A lot of people argued that Milgram’s experiment was unethical, but made sense logically. His ”experiment was carried out in the shadow of the Holocaust. The trial of Adolf Eichmann had the world wondering how the Nazis were able to persuade so many ordinary Germans to participate in the murder of innocent people” (Cohen A24). During world war two (WW II), Adolf Hitler, the leader of the Nazis’ came to power through his dictatorship which ultimately led to the demise of millions of Jews in order to create a master race. With the obedience of the militia, he rose to power annihilating any freedoms Jewish people had. His tactics were brutal and irreconcilably fatal for all who disobeyed him.

The main reason that Milgram decided to study the topic of obedience was to better understand the extreme inhumane conditions that Jews faced during the holocaust at the hands of German soldiers. Over the 12 year period between the early 1930’s through the mid 1940’s millions of Jews died in death camps run by Germans. Since Milgram himself was of Jewish descent, Milgram wanted to know how and why soldiers obeyed orders to kill innocent people.

Milgram was working as a professor at Yale University, when he began conducting a series of experiments that focused on the conflict between personal conscience and obeying authority (Cherry, 2004). At the time, many people were accused of affiliating with Nazis during World War II. A popular justification given by those on trial was that they were only following orders. The study began just one year after Adolf Eichmann’s trial in Jerusalem. Milgram’s experiment was devised to answer the question, "Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?" (McLeod, 2007).

Dr. Stanley Milgram, a 28-year-old graduate from Harvard in social psychology. Milgram conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. Milgram experiment was based on the killings in World War II of the Nazi’s by Germans. To perform this experiment Milgram ran ads in the newspaper, offering $4.00 for 1 hour of an individual time and an extra .50 for carfare if they participated. No high school students or college students were allowed to participate. No experience necessary and the age group range from the age of 20 years old to 50 years old. With this experiment, Milgram used some of his confederates as learners and participants as the teacher. Not knowingly,

Stanley Milgram was a psychology professor at Yale University, a prestigious school in Connecticut. He was interested in why so many German people in the 1930s and 1940s had followed instructions which involved causing pain or killing innocent human beings. His experiment on obedience to authority figures was a series of social psychology experiments that measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts conflicting with their personal conscience. Milgram first described his research in 1963 in an article published in the Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology.