The Importance Of Animal Testing For Cosmetics

The majority of people believe animal testing is dreadfully wrong. As animal testing becomes a popular conversation argument, the main altercation is how unjust and crooked it is. Companies especially those in the makeup industry, have gained popularity and admiration for wiping out animals testing for their products even though the products have actually been tested before put out on the market. Animal testing is now grasped as an abhorrent business, but what others do not realize is that without animal testing, the medical world and other productions would not be as advanced as it is today. Even though it seems as though the cons outweigh the pros, there is definitely a balance between them. Animal testing can save human lives and the medications tested on animals can also become a medication for animals if it works; however, some animals contract diseases easier than humans and can suffer because of this testing.

Imagine being born, only to live a life of torture. You are brought to a lab, and cruelly tested on against your will. Toxins poured into your eyes, painful injections to your skin, then left to die when you’re no longer useful. Although many do not realize it, people use products tested on animals in their everyday lives. For girls, many of your favorite makeup brands, such as Estee Lauder, Makeup Forever, and Maybelline take part in animal testing. Products such as toothpaste, cologne, deodorant, laundry detergent, razors, and even band-aids aren’t tested innocently, either. As a makeup enthusiast, I am passionate about how the products I use daily are tested. Today I will help you understand what animal testing is and how it started, how it’s currently affecting animals around the world, and what organizations are doing to help make a difference in the future. To begin, I will explain the history of animal testing. An animal test is any scientific experiment or test in which a live animal is forced to undergo something that is likely to cause them pain, suffering, distress, or lasting harm.(https://www.crueltyfreeinternational.org/why-we-do-it/what-animal-testing) Animal experiments are not the same as taking your animal to the vet. Animals used in laboratories are harmed, not for their own good, and usually killed at the end of an experiment. Animal experiments include injecting or force feeding animals with potentially harmful substances, exposing animals to radiation,

Everyday cosmetic products that many people use, such as lipsticks, shampoo, face wash, etcetera, are verified to be safe using animal testing. Chemical burns and other short term ailments are very serious concerns that plague Americans and the knowledge that the products they use will not harm them and their families is possible because of animal testing. Also long term effects, such as cancer, have been discovered through animal product testing and promptly stopped saving countless lives. “NOT TESTED ON ANIMALS YOU’RE THE GUINEA PIG” (Source C). Living day to day with the risk that the products trusted to use on your children and yourself is enough to validate

The cosmetic industry continues to compose a large part of society for several centuries, dating all the way back to the ancient Egyptians. The $160 billion-a-year global industry encompasses products such as make-up, skin and hair care, fragrances, cosmetic surgery, health clubs, and diet pills. With the recent surge of both affordable and luxury products flooding the markets, “Americans [are] [spending more each year on beauty than they do on education,” allowing distributors, such as Sephora, to turn a large profit (The Economist). Nevertheless, many of these state-of-the-art products are subjects of animal testing. Animal testing for cosmetics products allows distributors to carry innovative products and high-demanded

Animal testing is still done by cosmetic companies even though it is unethical and scientifically inaccurate. The various tests carried out on animals is not a guarantee for using cosmetics on our skin since animals react differently to certain chemicals as compared to humans. Cosmetics companies kill millions of animals every year in pursuit of profit. The animals that suffer and die in these laboratories range from rabbits to mice. According to companies that perform such tests, they are done to establish the safety of products and ingredients. However, no law requires that cosmetics products be tested on animals. The Food and Drug

For many years there has been a controversial debate on whether or not animals should be used as test subjects for human cosmetics. The debate has two major sides Pro-animal testing and Anti-animal testing. Both sides have many valid points and this is one of the major reasons the debate is still ongoing many years after it began. The Pro- animal testing side argues the usefulness of animal testing for ensuring the progression and comfort of human development. The Anti-animal testing side argues that not only is animal testing unreliable, it is also cruel and unnecessary. While there is a plethora of reasons animal testing should be banned, the three primary reasons are it is unreliable and incompatible with humans, it is cruel and harsh for

While certain animals are tested for medical reasons, some are used to test cosmetics. Cosmetic products include makeup items, perfumes, hair products, makeup brushes, lotions, soaps, etc.. “Alternatives to Animal Testing” states “Regulatory agencies require testing of consumer products, medicines, and industrial and agricultural chemicals to identify potential health and safety hazards”, meaning that testing of some kind is required before cosmetics can be sold. If makeup was not tested, it could be sold to millions of people and possibly cause harm. The damage caused by untested cosmetics could result in companies losing an incredible amount of money, and lessening said companies’ reliability. Animals seem to be an easy and accessible way to test

Many people are unaware that several brands they use on the daily practice animal testing to help develop their products. Although it may not be every brand on the shelf, there is a good handful of them that would surprise you. Products such as beauty cosmetics, household cleaners, personal cleanliness products, and food additives use tests. For example, the company Johnson and Johnson claims that they care for the world and the people. What they don’t quite understand is that mistreating animals is

(1) Tests on animals can’t always be a reliable source to predict the effects of a chemical or cosmetic ingredient on a human. The only way to test chemicals and ingredients for human effects would be to use a human. (2) It seems useless to put animals through so much pain and suffering if the results might not even be accurate. If the testing doesn’t guarantee an accurate result, then the animals shouldn’t be put through all of that for nothing. Animal testing also cannot guarantee safety for the user of the cosmetic because many times the test results are very unreliable. Different things react in different ways on different species. Results from animal tests can be over or underestimated to the extent on how it may react on a human. (1) Because is is proven that humans and animals don’t always have the same reactions, why wouldn’t the cosmetic companies use some type of alternative experiments that are more accurate? The two species have very different anatomy, so the reactions will obviously be different. There is also little scientific credibility of cosmetic animal testing because when it was first used in the 1930’s, we did not have a very good understanding of how toxicity worked in the human body or the know the difference of how it worked between different species. (1) Animal testing is not only cruel and not always reliable, but there are many more efficient and reliable alternatives to it.

Animal testing has become an increasingly controversial issue since the 1980s. This has been the case especially in the cosmetics industry, where esthetic value rather than necessity is at the core of the industry. Since information regarding the often unnecessarily cruel practice of animal testing has become public knowledge, many activist groups have targeted the industry to pressure manufacturers into stopping practices that have been deemed unacceptable. While some of these efforts have met with some success, many cosmetic companies still do use animal testing in a somewhat covert way, despite public claims that this is not the case. Another concern for activists is the harmful chemicals in cosmetics. These are marketed to a largely uninformed public. Some of these substances are even claimed to cause various types of cancer, such as breast cancer in women. Activist groups therefore worked to raise public awareness of a largely unregulated industry in which especially giant companies have concealed their unethical practices in order to promote sales.

Some people think that using animals for cosmetics,and testing cosmetics on animals is good and helps the animals and people, others think it’s wrong….. Women, who are the major consumers of cosmetics, largely oppose animal testing of cosmetics, with 72 percent of those polled opposed. Most women - 70 percent - think animal testing of cosmetics should be illegal. Strong majorities of women think animal testing of cosmetics should be illegal, regardless of age, level of education or ethnicity. 68 percent of voters know that animals are used to test the safety of cosmetics.Three in four voters say that they would feel safer, or as safe, if non-animal methods were used to test the safety of a cosmetic instead of animal testing. The survey of 802 U.S. registered voters, including 206 via cell phone, was conducted by Lake Research Partners from Feb. 5 - 11, 2013, and was commissioned by The HSUS and HSLF. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.47 percent. The questions and results can be viewed here.

Animal testing has been a controversy long debated over. However, more recently cosmetic animal testing has been a focus for many people. Cosmetic animal testing includes experimenting with cosmetics on guinea pigs, hamsters, mice, rabbits, and rats. According to the Food and Drug Administration cosmetics are anything used on the human body with the intention of beautifying or cleansing. Some examples of these include lipstick, face makeup, deodorant, perfume, nail polish, shampoo, hair dyes, any ingredient used in a cosmetic, and many more. Human Society International stated that about 100,000-200,000 suffer and die each year due to cosmetic testing. In the U.S cosmetic animal testing is legal, however, there are certain

There are only specific things that are required by law to test on animals and cosmetics are not one of them. To be in fact, “Products that are not required by law to be tested include household items, cosmetics, and personal care products.“ (Rollins 2). So, if the law is not requiring companies to do something, there is no point at all to do it. In addition to it not being required by law, all the companies are really doing is making it 10 times more difficult for animal rights supports. Now not only do these supports have to fight against the scientist who test on animals for medicine, but now the animal right supporters also have to protest against animal testing for cosmetics that do not need to be tested. “Those who support animal rights and/or animal welfare, including members of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), and the National Anti-Vivisection Society, are responsible for helping to raise awareness of animal suffering and unnecessary animal testing” (PETA). Overall, testing on animals for cosmetics is just a pointless idea because cosmetic companies are not required to test on animals, so in the end all companies are doing is just making it more challenging for the people that

Much progress has been made to end this testing, gearing the world into the right direction of animal testing free procedures, though, not everyone is on board. The United States have yet to hop onto the train toward a free animal testing future. The United States continues to test on animals for cosmetics even though there are numerous ways to test, without using animals, that are more efficient and effective than animal testing. (3D tissue samples of corneas made from human cells can be used instead of using an animal organ when testing for cosmetics side effects.) What is worse than the United States still testing on animals, is that there is continued demand for even more animal

Animal testing has long played a part in the science of testing, and it still plays a very important role in the medical world. Testing on animals in order to create a cure for AIDS is one thing, but testing on animals for human vanity is another. Animal testing is used to test the safety of a product. It has kept some very unsafe substances out of the cosmetic world. However, in this day in age, animal testing is not the only way to test the safety of a product. Animal testing in cosmetics has decreased over the years. However, it is still used by many companies in America. Animal testing is not only cruel, but it is also unnecessary in today’s advanced scientific world.