The Importance Of Charter Schools Vs. Public Schools

Public education has had a negative effect on students; it’s often because of the bigger class sizes, poor test scores, and high crime in the surrounding areas. Public schools need to revise their system to determine what’s the best fit for their student’s educational needs. All children who live in a school district have a right to attend a district school. Many parents would like more options and opportunities for their child, and would like to be involved in their child’s education. Charter schools are part of the answer for a better educational choice for children’s academic achievement. Charter schools have many successful methods and continue to pave the way for children’s education needs .

Charter schools are an alternative to public schools. Whether this alternative is a better solution to the public schools is the argument. Public schools can be just as creative as charter schools. Public schools are funded by our tax dollars, which ultimately the United States Government decides where those funds go. Education should be the last thing to be cut in the budget, but unfortunately, we the people do not have a choice other than the public offices whom we hope will do what they have said in their election speeches. Charter schools have come about to fill the gap that public schools cannot fill. They can gear their curriculum to student needs, where some public schools cannot because of funding cuts.

Charter schools are unique public schools that is allowed the freedom to be more innovative while being held accountable for advancing student achievement. These charter schools are not private schools, they do not charge for tuition and they are open to all children within specific boundaries. Research has demonstrated that charter schools make picks up in the urban community with students who have veritably been undeserved by traditional state funded schools. Charter schools outscored their traditional school peers in 25 of the 41 cities in math, and 23 of the 42 cities in reading. On average, charter schools had no significant impacts on student’s achievement. Charter schools help enhance student learning, empower the utilization of new and imaginative educating strategies, and give schools an approach to move from a lead based to an execution based arrangement of responsibility. Public schools are like charter schools except for the freedom that a charter school has. And private school is based on tuition and that is funded by charities and tax holders in that community.

It was with wild fanfare that the state’s Republican legislature and Republican Governor enacted their reforms for the state’s public school system. Among the panaceas was charter schools, a ‘90s education fad that gives individual parents the right to send their children to state-approved public charter schools at public expense. Politicians reasoned that less-bureaucratic charter schools would teach students better than traditional public schools because charter schools wouldn’t be subject to the same mandates that the state had heaped upon public schools. Furthermore, traditional schools would be forced to compete with charter schools as they lured thousands

For nearly a decades, charter schools have become the modern rival of public schools, but does the charter schools is the best? In modern society, people keep chasing the American dream; they want to achieve better life quality and higher education. As most people believe, education is a primarily way to train children all the skills which will need as adults to find good jobs and live well, but the nation have many different types of schools, such as private schools, charter schools, home schools, or traditional public schools. Therefore, when a kid is old enough to start going to school, it’s also a tough time for parents to make a decision to choose type of education system which they trust enough to hand over the children’s future. According to a source, when compare to traditional public school, although some of charter schools were “successful”, some were “troubled and struggling”, but most of them were “somewhere in between just like traditional public schools.”(Grace) .Therefore, in my opinion, the government should not convert all public schools to charter schools because charter school itself still exists some issues which may make education becomes worse, such as inconformity in school management system, under-performing in comparison to public schools, and teachers’ experiences.

The last reason why charter schools are now better than public schools is because charter schools are not dealing with racial problems. This means that there are no such things as racism in charter schools while some public schools are now still have to deal with bullying and racist actions from one student toward another. With the amount of bullying and racism still happening out there, children needed this type of environment to study in so that they don’t have to be afraid or stress out. This is an important factor that makes charter schools so special. Not only charter schools don’t have any racism issues, they also provide students with disabilities special programs to make them feel like home. According to Ronald W. Holmes, a PhD from

Students in charter schools has their education results improved significantly compares to the others who are going to public schools. Charter schools, like public schools, receive public funding. These school are

Charter schools serve students better than public schools because charter schools have a lot to offer. If parents send their children to private school they would have to fork out the tuition bills themselves. Since charter school financing is taken care of by the public, parents don’t need to worry about having enough money to send their children to school. So many families that cannot afford to enroll their children in private schools can have the option of sending their children to charter schools. The public financing that charter schools receive makes it free for all families. Many charter schools have special interest classes and give students a choice to choose classes such as the performing arts. Those students that attend these

The biggest concern that everybody has is funding. How does charter schools gain their funding? I learned that most of the funding comes the public schools. Every parent wants a good education for their child whether they attend a public school or a charter school. Stated in Schuster’s 2015 article, “tuition payments are roughly equal to average per pupil spending in the sending district (the district where a student resides and would otherwise have attended the traditional public school).” For example, if 100 students from one district attend a charter school and its 12,000 dollars per student that district has to pay 1,200,000 dollars to the charter school.

While caps are one obstacle that charter school advocates will have to overcome there is an equally pressing obstacle. “Unequal financing is another obstacle. A Fordham Institute study found that on average charters receive $1,800 less per student than traditional public schools, despite serving more disadvantaged students” (Smarick, Andy 2008). If charter schools are to flourish they will need to fight for more state funding. After all “charter schools are public schools” (Center for Education Reform), and as a public school should be awarded the same funding as regular public schools. “Like district public schools, they are funded according to enrollment (also called average daily attendance, or ADA), and receive funding from the district and the state according to the number of students attending” (Center for Education Reform). However, as Andy Smarick stated they do not receive the same amount per student as district public schools.

Charter Schools: Another Flawed Educational Reform?, a book written by the late Seymour B. Sarason, author and Professor of Psychology in the Department of Psychology and Institution for Social and Policy Analysis at Yale University, is a plea to educators and legislators alike to thoroughly consider the possible effects of creating and funding charter schools. Sarason’s background in the field, at the time of publication, spanned over fifty years, and included many educational reform-related papers and books.

Charter schools have recently become a topic of debate among educators. Charter schools are schools working in the public sector of education while also being privately owned. Charter schools are privately run, but receive public funding. There has been much debate since the sprouting of Charter schools about the demographics being represented and underrepresented. While there is evidence to support both sides of this argument, it should be clear to anyone after doing the research that charter schools are an overall negative aspect of the educational system.

Many studies address this issue. For example, Bruce Fuller from the University of California, Berkley states, “Three national studies have shown that the average charter student is not out performing the average regular public school student…” (“Charter School Proponents Focus on Accountability in Word if Not in Deed”). According to this article, charter school students are in fact taking in less than regular public schools. Another study by the National Center for Education Statistics shows that math scores are higher in public schools because charter schools spend more time on english (Chudowsky et al. 6). Obviously, if English is the main focus, then math scores will not be as high. Bottom line, regular public schools are still out performing charter schools, but why? Another NCES study suggests that larger class sizes in charter schools are one of what could be may causes. With larger class sizes, students are not given as much one on one time. This could be the difference in public school children outperforming or not (Chudowsky et al.

The system of the school has segregation of public schools and charter schools that is causing problem to students from public school. For instance a latest course case involving, “The Lawsuit, Vergara v. California aimed to strike down statues that make it difficult for administrators to dismiss poorly performing teachers, require layoffs based purely on seniority and allow for permanent employment status after eighteen month of teaching.” (Tillotson) A student that is attending at public school will no longer has to worry about teachers with poor teaching skills that can ruin the students’ education and their careers. Some teacher wanted to prevent this from happening and good example involving, “California teacher unions wanted to intervene and were a part of the Vergara v. California lawsuit case.” (Tillotson) The California teachers wanted to save the tenure system for their own benefits instead of thinking about the student benefits and ruining the student life. There were some people that wanted help the student like for example, “A court judge called Rolf M. Treu was in favor of the students and he found all the challenged statues are not constitutional about the tenure system.” (Tillotson) Rolf made it possible to have a better learning system and good teacher for students to learn in public school

(1) "What is the effect of charter schools on student achievement?” and (2) "To what extend does charter schools influence education reform?"