The Importance Of Close Relationships : Individual And Social Mindset Essay

By definition, self-perception is your interpretation of your own behavior. However, your interpretation of yourself could be influenced by what others think and say about you. Sometimes people find themselves over analyzing who they are and they end up degrading themselves or they try to change who they truly are. As emotional human beings, they seem to find themselves being more judgmental toward their own actions and appearances. When others make assumptions, they only see the outside and make judgements based on appearances rather than looking deeper in order to discover the true beauty that’s exists beneath. “Lonesome, With Snails”, “The Mother”, and “Portrait of My Body” are three essays that will be used to explain how self-perception

Dignity and Worth of the person is to respect the dignity and worth of the person in a respectful, caring and mindful of the individual different cultural and ethnic diversity. Importance of Human relationship is to recognize the central importance of human relationship, to promote, restore maintain and enhance the well-being of individuals, families, social groups, organizations and communities. A social worker should avoid any negative criticism in communications with a client or their colleagues.

An individual’s opinion of who and what they helps them form and develop their own individuality. It is established through the individual’s behaviour and attitude. It relates to how they view themselves and is associated with their own self-image, body image and self-esteem. Murphy (as cited by Gross, 2001) stated the self is part of the individual which is understood and know to by the individual them self. A person’s physical appearance is the first thing that is seen when they are in contact with others. If the individual feels positive and confident within themselves then this will influence the development of a strong and healthy life. This can also influence how they experience life allowing them to develop in a positive, healthy way and enabling them to build up strong relationships with others. Self concept can be based upon one’s own expectations and goals which they hold

Humanity’s potential to develop interpersonal relationships is fundamental to their growth and can be detrimental to society if not maintained. Focusing on a relationship between two spouses; it is traditionally presumed to be mutually beneficial. It is this mutual benefit where a healthy relationship can contribute to an individual’s attainment of goals, moral construction, and perception of society.

Any time someone thinks, their brain has a special, designated voice for their thoughts. This voice, allows an individual to in some degree, have a conversation with their self, without necessarily communicating out loud. This voice in our heads has had numerous names throughout the years, such as a person’s conscious or recently has been called the “self.” Many researchers have wanted to know who and or what the actual voice is that we hear in our conversations. Richard Rass author of “Introduction to Perspectives on the Self: Conversations on Identity and Consciousness”, explains that “self has assumed radically different meanings…” throughout the years (Rass 2). Knowing what “self” is and why it helps enlighten our lives is apart of the journey. Rass stated that the “self” or conscious could play a role in knowing humans “psychological composition” (Rass 2). With new research appearing more than ever before, we are gradually obtaining the ability to

In a passage of Roberta M. Gilberts textbook Extraordinary Relationships: A New Way of Thinking About Human Interactions (1992), she argues “Excellence in relationships, for most people, ranks alongside unified field theory among the inscrutable problems of the world” (p. 113). I believe this statement accurately sums up how there is no such thing as a perfect relationship, only two individuals working on their own personal level of maturity, which in turn will lead to a well-functioning relationship. There were several concepts presented throughout chapters 13 – 20 and in the video discussions. They were each of equal importance and each greatly impacts the understanding of relationships and how to move towards better relationships.

The main point of Baldwin et al.’s theoretical analysis was to discover how an individual’s sense of self is affected by many components, including personal experiences. The mental association between these two factors was proposed because self-prospection and close relationships are tied to how individuals view themselves. We sometimes see ourselves as who we’re with, and how they treat us translates to how we see ourselves.

We followed Dillman’s Principles in order to make the survey as clear, concise, and simple as possible. First, we determine the research objectivity; people who developed negative attachments are more likely to be affected in their romantic relationships, such as, unstable relationships and feelings of distrust towards their romantic partners. We then construct a series of questions related to the objectivity of the research to identify how negative attachments affects romantic relationships, for example “My desire to be very close sometimes scares people away,” and “I am nervous when partners get too close to me.” We ask questions separately, avoiding two questions on the same sentence, and we chose words that are easy to understand. We chose items that are coded based on the attachment styles and some that are reverse coded to get as much a

Many couples want a successful relationship that is also satisfying. Partners who are satisfied with their interactions tend to be satisfied with other non-romantic relationships (Emmers-Sommer, 514). As a response to ongoing interaction between partners, loving attitudes are formed and are shaped by personality types, and the past and existing relationship interactions (Meeks, Hendrick and Hendrick, ‘98).

The self is an ever-changing system of perspectives that is formed and sustained in communications with others and ourselves (Wood, 178). This definition emphasizes that the self is not static or fixed, but dynamic (Wood, 178). According to Wood (3013), “the term self is a singular noun , which implies it is a single entity, but yet there are many facets to the self” (p.178). You have a physical self that includes your height, weight, body type, abilities and disabilities, and the color of your skin, hair, and eyes (Wood, 178). You also have an emotional self that reflects how sensitive you are, whether you have a temper, and so forth (Wood, 178). Your cognitive self includes your intelligence and intellectual aptitudes (Wood, 178).

For example one studied relieved, “when one partner cares for and supports the other, he or she tends to believe that these feelings are reciprocated—regardless of whether they are or not.” Another study evaluated specific cognitive processes that are used to distort our beliefs about our partners. Lemay has uncovered that biased memories play a part. For example, “He had partners report their partner’s responsiveness—care, positive regard and commitment—at the end of the day for seven days. Those who were most motivated to bond with their partner on a particular day—these men and women remembered their partners as more responsive the day before.” These results lead to his discovery that cognitive processes distort our beliefs about our partners.

In our culture the relationship most often discussed when describing human interaction and that which is considered the most “ideal” or “normal” relationship (demonstrated by cultural morality and various forms of media) is that of the male-female couple. This pair-bonding is a phenomenon that exists to some degree in the natural world, but occurs most prominently in humans. The development of the pair-bond is one of the single most important aspects of human evolution, culture, and relationships as we understand them today. This behavior has driven human sociality, reproduction, and cultural development through evolutionary, physiological, and psychological means. By understanding and assessing the history and evolution of pair bonding, the means by which our cultural foundations were established can be discovered.

A barkada is the Filipino translation of peers or group of friends. Peers are one of the most influential people during adolescence period. Barkadas are formed in school when different groups are joined together, such as when a group of athletes in the same sport that hang out together after games as well as students who have diverse interests may possibly form a barkada. As long as these friendships have consistency and positive interactions. In this paper, it will tackle the important of teenagers to be part of a barkada. According to an article entitled, ‘The Need to Belong’ by Baumeister and Leary, people join barkadas because they have a drive to form and maintain positive as well as significant interpersonal relationships. However, interactions with friends are not only due to the fundamental drive to belong, but also a way to reinforce the personal development and experiences that are salient throughout one’s lifespan.

There are many different thoughts about dating, love and marriage. I had the pleasure of interviewing six co-workers from different lifestyle regarding their views on these matters. I will compare their thoughts with the theories of love and attachment. The social science theories that help us understand the components and processes of love include attachment theory, Reiss’s wheel theory of love, Sternberg’s triangular theory of love, Lee’s research on the styles of loving, and exchange theories.

The five general perspectives on human behavior used are the biological perspective, the learned perspective, the social and cultural perspective, the cognitive perspective and the psychodynamic perspective. These five perspectives can help us to understand just how a relationship can begin when two people meet. How their relationship might develop, and how the relationship will be maintained. All of the perspectives play a part in how we begin a relationship and how the relationship will be maintained over time. Throughout the course of this paper we will compare and contrast how these perspectives impact our behavior in a loving relationship. I will use my own marriage with my wife to show how each of the perspectives contributed to the beginning of our relationship, the maintenance of our relationship and how the differences have had a negative impact on our relationship.