The NCAA is a multi-billion dollar industry that generated over $845 billion last year due to their players’ ability to entertain and perform to their fullest extent at all times. So with all of this money flowing in, why wouldn’t they provide their athletes a stipend? Well that’s a question that today baffles many. What they basically have in place is a corporation that makes tons of money and, oh yeah, they don’t have to pay their employees. Sounds like the perfect business model right? What has continued to be one of the most pressing issues in the world of sports today has now become a matter the NCAA can no longer afford to ignore. The service that college athletes provide to the institutions they attend in addition to millions of spectators all over the world is still not being rewarded in the manner that it should be for their above-average dedication, work ethic, and most importantly money brought in to their employer.
The most common argument against athletes being paid is that
…show more content…
Athletes spend more than 40 hours a week practicing, leaving little time to keep up with academic commitments. For NCAA executives, administrators and support staff who start feeling the burn around hour 42, they should remember that their student-athletes’ jobs are not only intellectually demanding but brings them to the limits of their physical endurance as well. If this situation was on any other job, it would take the world by its throat. College is when students look for their first to support them for four, or more, long years. On top of working for that long, they travel across the country almost twice a week. That takes a lot of strength off your body and to replenish their energy they constantly need proper meals. A 250 pound, 6 foot football player is not going to live off ramen for their health and to stay fit to perform at their fullest capability for the school to
The NCAA or the National Collegiate Athletic Association in its 2014 total fiscal revenue collection data racked up a whopping $989 million dollars, nearly reaching a billion dollars according to USA Today Sports in article done by Steve Berkowitz. The biggest revenue earners in NCAA sports are men’s college football and basketball, with those two sports alone making $166 million alone. In addition to that $166 million, the television revenues from viewers, ticket sales, and merchandise purchases add another surplus of hundreds of millions of dollars unaccounted for. At times going respectfully to the university as their profit, where for example a standalone college like Texas A&M in the year 2014-2015 generated a total revenue of $192 million itself, which factored in ticket sales, rights/licensing to the team’s name, contributions, and other sources of revenue, according to USA
With debate on whether or not to compensate the college athletes in monetary terms due to the students’ sports talents help their various colleges to receive awards both rewards and cash money, it is important to look at criticisms of the National Collegiate Athletic Association with regards to the association’s advertisement deals of approximately more than a billion shillings profits yet no athlete is being compensated for his or her hard work. That according to Zimbalist (2013) is because the critiques are using the very developments to argue in favour of the payment of the student athletes since the opportunity for education and exposure to earn a professional contract is enough compensation since the cost of paying the student athletes would be too high.
The NCAA does not allow athletes to make any type of money. For example, Donald De La Haye, was a kicker for UCF who was ruled ineligible for making money off YouTube. The NCAA may want to pay every single athlete, but that is not possible considering the amount of college students play sports. The NCAA is a $11 Billion Industry that makes money off of these players by having televised games that NCAA would make money. This is especially emphasized during March Madness or the College Football Playoffs. Fans will also come to see the games which the money made with seating will go to the NCAA. Coaches get paid millions of dollars per year while players receive nothing for putting their bodies on the line. For example, Mike Krzyzewski, who is the basketball coach for Duke University, is being paid $7.2 million per year. Being a college athlete is like a full time job. Each athlete trains and practices trying to get to the professionals and make a living. Some athletes don’t really pay attention in class where they could be learning valuable
The National Collegiate Athletic Association is a business that keeps expanding while the players it supports make nothing. This year the NCAA announced that they are on the verge of reaching the one billion dollar mark in annual revenue. Last year they pulled in an astonishing nine hundred and eighty nine million dollars. Most of its profit growth comes from the division one men’s basketball tournament, which accounts for eighty to ninety percent of their success. With all this incoming profit some players feel as though they are entitled to a piece of the pie. There are currently lawsuits pending and some players have even gone as far as attempting to unionize. Although they are receiving scholarships and get a lot of other assistance,
College athletes are taken advantage of on a daily basis. Student athletes have to spend all day in class having to meet vigorous academic requirements well also having to stay competitive in sports. For doing so much you think the NCAA would at least give them some money to live off. When students have no money they are more likely to sell their autographs or take money from boosters. When students accept money from boosters it not only affects the player but it affects the team. Some ways that it affects the whole team is by reducing the amount of scholarships a team can give out that year. It could also affect their college playoff hopes by not allowing them to participate in their college bowl games.
Nine days till Christmas break. Just nine long and exhausting days separating us from sweet, freedom and our own lovely beds! Have you ever thought about how crazy it is for us to be so desperate and excited for a break? We just had one! Thanksgiving was a quick tease for our soon long month of, lets be real, sleeping and Netflix. Thanksgiving was full of food, shopping, sleep, and football. Even if you’re not a huge football fan your Thanksgiving was in some way affected by America’s favorite sport. Whether it was watching your team play, or watching some family member going crazy at the TV, my dad…. Football is a traditional part of our day of thanks. Have you ever thought about what it would be like to be playing in one of those games on
Nearly $1 billion dollars is what the NCAA made in 2014 off of sports events and merchandise, and they still will not provide the players with an income. Some say that given the player an education is enough, but it's not anymore because they are making too much money off theses players. Paying college athletes is the right thing to do because it is their money that is being collected, if a player is hurt during a college game then it could make it to where they can’t play professional, or they should be able to take endorsement deals.
Judy Rose, Director of Athletics at the University of North Carolina, stated, “I don’t think athletes are being exploited. I think there’s a symbiotic relationship there. Without the university platform for them to compete, there is no exposure for them.” College athletes everywhere are fighting for a paycheck when they should be more appreciative of the advantages they are given through playing college sports. While student athletes put a lot of time and work into their sport, college athletes should not be paid because players will be able to go to the professionals and be paid if they are good enough, it would be hard to determine how much each athlete should be paid, and they will be rewarded with an education at a good college.
There has been a lot of talk and many articles and hours upon hours of debates going on on sportscenter and just simply among common people about whether or not college athletes should be paid. College athletes shouldn’t be paid with all of the benefits they already have and there is some evidence as to of why they should be paid but it’s not enough. A ton of evidence has been shown for why college athletes shouldn’t be paid such as scholarships, the amount of money the college is making off of sports, etc. and much detail that goes into it throughout the essay. College athletes should not be paid because of all the benefits they already get as it is they really don’t need more benefits stacked on top of what they already
The typical Division 1 athlete devotes a whopping 43.3 hours per week to his sport- 3.3 more hours than the average work week (Smith). In addition to this, the athletes have to deal with waking up far earlier than others to lift, followed by going to classes and ending the day with more practice. They are then expected to be able to perform academically the same as everyone else. Student athletes are also expected to hold themselves at a higher standard than others simply because they play a sport. Many coaches monitor the social media of the athletes to make sure they are not putting their athletic career at stake by going to college
“I’ve been writing about this issue for several years now calling for college athletes to be paid the wages that they deserve and am sad to acknowledge that very little has changed since I was a college athlete at UCLA, so poor that I and most of my teammates could barely scrape by. But just as with every injustice, wrongs don’t get righted unless we keep raising our voices again and again. So, once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more” (Kareem Abdul Jabbar Guardian Par 2). They fail to acknowledge how much our college athletes work and how we fail to even give them a single cent for how hard they work for their respective schools. The Guardian talks to Kareem Abdul Jabbar about his views on the recent controversy about how the schools
Division 1 sports have increased monstrously among Americans in the course of recent decades. Division 1 college athletes should be paid because players are giving up their bodies for their school, it will keep more players in school, and to ensure an equal distribution of the revenue that the players bring to the school. This has expanded incomes for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the participating universities which has fueled the level headed discussion of whether school competitors ought to be paid past their athletic grants. In the course of recent decades, Division 1 sports have increased tremendously in the United States. Regardless of whether it be football, basketball, or hockey, etc. as far back as the start of the century, college athletics have gotten an overflow of income to their separate universities, and additionally enhancing the college's notoriety. For instance, in a review led by the Orlando Sentinel, it was evaluated that the University of Texas' Athletic Program had the most astounding income of some other University at
A college athlete has one of the toughest schedules you can think of. Most people feel that college athletes have things easy,but that is far from the
College sports have got a lot more popularity across the country then when it first started, over the last few decades. Intercollegiate sports such as football, basketball, or hockey have brought in extra money to their Universities, and also made their colleges more popular. Even though those sports are bringing millions in, no college athletes are legally rewarded for their work and performance. According to NCAA rules, “You are not eligible for participation in a sport if you have ever taken money from anyone, or someone promised to pay you, for competing in that sport” (NCAA Regulations 1). Because of this rule, college athletes have a difficult time paying for college, but also many athletes are starting to be paid under the table through
Now and days people are starting to consider paying college athletes but that may not be the best idea. College athletes should not be paid because universities are already paying for education and scholarships which should already be enough, also there is no fair way to pay athletes, and playing in a colligate sport should be a privilege.