The Importance Of Commitment In The Military

Over the past few years, there has been huge discussions when the topic of equality for women who have joined the military is being brought up. Being that gender equality is a big thing in the military now, I decided to chose this topic and discuss how I feel about it. According to the United States constitution, all men are created equal and this does not exclude women. One of the main things I learned is that equality for women in the military is a major issue. There should be no gender inequality in the United States military period. Most jobs are now open to women that were once allowed for only a man to do but when it comes to something such as the military, it should have always been that way No one should be told they can’t do something when it requires fighting for your country. Even back when men were drafted in the military, women should have been able to get drafted as well. You would think the military would take any and everybody that is willing to fight for his or her country simply because it would make our job easier as a whole. Frequently, women are stereotyped as feeble and incapable of doing certain things. Nevertheless, this should not be applied in any kind of career, particularly in the military.

Army therefore being extremely credible on the subject. From her time in service she comes to the conclusion that a woman cannot physically pull the same heavy load that a man can. Although there is no doubt that some women are without a doubt more than capable to do this, more often than not, most women cannot. She also presents the fact that when at the age of 18, males only, are made to sign up for the draft. If ever there was a draft women are still exempt from being able to be drafted. Her argument is that if women would like equality, is it not time to open the draft to all genders?. Added with the evidence provided is statistics showing that the Department of Veterans Affairs pays more than $500 million dollars for degenerative service connected ailments in females alone. This raises the question of whether or not the amount of money being paid for service connected injuries would rise. Assuming whether or not women do start taking part in infantry integration. These issues do not require the filling in of people in order to complete a job, such as when a female gets pregnant before a deployment. This not only would leave the unit with a person down, but it now has to take the position and fill it with someone else from another unit or command. This makes combat readiness a challenge. All of these factors can and will change the moral of

Sacrifice is giving up something you like, in order to help someone else, without expecting anything in return. Some things that you can sacrifice are: belongings, comfort, or even just time. These can be used to help the needy, or just give comfort to someone who needs it. A sacrifice is a way to show that you care about someone or something, and that you want to help them. It could be something small, like going to see a friend who needs your help instead of going to an activity you really want to do, or something big, like giving your life to serve in the military.

How is Loyalty defined in the modern military today? Loyalty is a characteristic and trait that cannot be forced upon a soldier nor feared into them. Loyalty is rather created and developed on the basis of trust from others around you including your superiors. Instilling and creating a trusting bond will allow the soldier to develop loyalty to oneself, their unit, and their chain of command.

According to Szayna (21) joining the infantry traditionally was reserved for men. All branches of the army have different standards for males and females. The reason is that women would not qualify to join the military if there were not separate standards for them. The argument

Profoundly influenced by two post-9/11 protracted wars that highlighted the expanded role of women in combat, civilian leaders have opted to pursue a gender neutral military apparently on the grounds that integrating women in direct ground combat arms roles is both essential and prudent. Central to the rhetoric is that women are not only qualified, but that they bring a wealth of diverse talents that they should be able to apply across all disciplines within the Armed Forces and in turn, be afforded the opportunity to ascend to more senior ranks. However, policy makers are deliberately ignoring decades of medical research and evidence that strongly counter the logic of such a decision and brings into question their motives. The purpose of this paper is to synthesize and present the extensive body of evidence that exists counter to the rationality of pursuing a fully integrated, gender neutral military. This research paper uses a qualitative approach to argue that integrating women in the Marine Corps’ infantry will degrade readiness, deplete a talented pool of women from the total force, and impact the overall combat effectiveness of the Marine Corps. After presenting a brief background of how we arrived at the present date decision and debate, this paper will enumerate the impacts of physiological differences between genders. Next, the paper will then lay out the cumulative impacts that the difference in physical strength and endurance have on attrition and readiness

Males and females have many physical differences between them. Some of these issues would be those female soldiers are, on average, five inches short; possess half the upper body strength as men; have 37% less muscle mass. These differences lead to complication sin the military, women may seem capable of performing the necessary tasks but it is the unnoticed, little tasks that cannot be performed. A female soldier may be able to drive a five-ton truck, but they may not be able to change a tire; thus, making the male soldier step in and help. Furthermore, women may be placed in a "field-artillery" unit, but often times they cannot handle the ammunition. Despite all of the physical drawbacks, there has been some success from females on the front line (Owens). While this is biologically proven, there has been research presenting effective ways of training women’s bodies to keep up with males’ bodies. The Defense Women's Health Program (DWHRP) conducted a research in 1994 to focus on the importance of training for military women. The study was conducted on groups of female civilians, female soldiers, and female college students ranging from 14-weeks to six months. The study showed increases in strength, body composition, material handling, etc. Powerful data was obtained during the study that challenged earlier studies which questioned the trainability of women. However, even

In 2013, Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta lifted the military ban on women in combat which was created to restrict women from infantry and artillery in 1994. In the research, it shows the military restricted rule was created because of the typically traditionally gender stereotype. In 2014, the Marine Corps postpone the deadline for women to held the same physical standard as men. After some of the women couldn’t pass the physical fitness exam, the Marine Corps allow women to pass without the physical fitness exam. Women are treated differently from men because of their physical qualities. Some men think women as a fragile flower. If women are supposed to have the same equal standard as men, why are their different physical fitness grading

In the article “Women in Combat: Education, Leadership Keys To Success” Jacqueline Hames talks about the different concerns there are for women joining the military. Hames discusses how different groups are actively trying to decrease the health concerns that arise for women that join the military. No matter what branch of the military women choose to join there will be health concerns that arise, so women should not be banned from some roles in the military just because of health concerns, and allowed in others. According to Hames, direct combat roles for women raise certain physical and psychological health concerns, but that the Department of Defense and the Army are actively researching on how to find a way to still integrate women into these positions. Also, Hames says that the Women’s Health Task Force is focused on the gender-specific health needs of women who serve in the military, helping to make sure that the military meets all the health needs of women and men equally. Women should not be banned from certain roles in the military just because of some health concerns that may arise, they should have the right to choose if they would like to serve in the military or not, just as men

One reason gender discrimination is an issue for women joining the military is because of the physical strength barriers between men and women. According to a military psychology study, “Although physical strength has been a barrier for women, strength tests are poor predictors of success and equipment design and physical training can counteract

The first woman was introduced to the active service in the United State military in 1917, with Loretta Walsh enlisting in the Navy to serve as a Yeoman in World War I. A woman could not serve in a combative capacity until 23 January, 2013 when then Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta lifted the military’s ban on women serving in such roles. Recently Naval Special Warfare has become the latest elite force within the military to open its doors to the potential for women operators. This of course raises a list of concerns, the most prominent of which is whether or not a female is capable of meeting the physical standards which Naval Special Warfare has adamantly stated will not be altered for members of either sex. This potential for a lack

I served 24 years in the Marine Corps as an infantry officer and I absolutely respect the incredibly qualified females I had the opportunity to serve with. However, I wholeheartedly disagree with women assigned to an infantry position. It is NOT a right to serve and we discriminate every day in the military. If you're too tall, too short, too heavy, too light, or can't pass physical, mental, or moral requirements then too bad, find another job. I'm sure there are plenty of 6 ft, 10 in tall people who have the mental capacity to be a fighter pilot but that doesnt mean we redesign aircraft to support everyone who wants a shot at being a pilot. Sorry, go find another job. I believe 100% there are women who can pass the physical requirements of

The final reason is that lowering standards to accommodate gender equality will lead to a weaker military. A weaker military will threaten our status as a dominant power and potentially open our country up to further terrorist attacks. The military has a history of lowering the bar for women. The West Point military academy admits that its physical standards are far easier for women, whereas the Army's Airborne School used to deny it but now publishes standards showing just that. We also know that Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey put an impossible burden on the military to show that if physical training standards are so high that they're keeping women out, "does it really have to be that high?" That would be like forcing a professional

The definition of “gender-neutral” has a different definition for everyone and it does not necessarily mean energy exertion. These neutral standards are carefully put together to ensure that the soldier will be successful in battle. Moreover, combat depends on the person, not the gender. If a five foot tall, ninety-five pound man wants to enlist in a combat position, he is permitted to at least try. If he is able to complete the tasks, he is allowed to fight. Then why should a six foot tall, one hundred-eighty pound woman not be able to do the same? If the woman has the ability to carry the necessary load and complete the necessary tasks, it is logical to allow her on the battlefront with the rest of the competent men. The women who are looking for combat positions are not worried about their feelings or what is politically correct. They want equal opportunities and if they qualify, they should have the chance.

Women have already proven their selves to be able to do just about as much as men can in a combat role. However, there are quite a few concerns when it comes to women serving in combat. For example, the physical ability of women. Majority of jobs in the armed forces are open equally to men and women, but there are some jobs to which women are not physically able to pursue. There