The Importance Of Corporal Punishment

Corporal punishment teaches kids to be respectful. In source A it is said “ Kids at the school sat the paddle definitely think twice about acting up’’ With this being saidis shows that the kids being hit with the paddle makes them never want to act up again so they do not get hit. In source A it is also said that John C. Calhoun Elementary earned three statewide awards. The kids began to be more respectful and it changed the school for the better. It was also said in source A “ There will always be new kids who need to learn the limits at school. ” Having corporal punishment will teach the kids the limits and they will learn to be more respectful.

Parents are afraid that if they don’t give their children harsh discipline they will grow to become incompetent members of society. This is a valid concern; no caregiver would ever want to see their child fail. Parents are also imperfect, they become frustrated and tired. Sometimes corporal punishment can be easier to dole out instead of a more productive strategy. What mostly keeps the cycle of corporal punishment going is the “My parents hit me and I turned out just fine” argument. If violent punishment is all someone has ever known, it’s understandable that they would turn to that form of discipline in adulthood. When looking at corporal punishment in this context, it seems entirely justified; however, this would be ignoring a multitude of data that describes the ill-effects

During the 1900’s, corporal punishment was well known and often used to punish and teach children effectively. Philosophers like John Locke express insightful views about forcing a child to learn, rather than allowing the child to freely do so at his or her own pace. Imagine two children learning the same topic of mathematics. One child is introduced to mathematics through counting apples and pears and is allowed to eat the fruits afterwards, whereas the other child is forced to learn mathematics through textbooks with minimum visualization and finds no fun in doing so. The child who is counting through fruits is getting positive feedback because of his ability to quickly catch on and the child who is learning through a textbook is gaining negative feedback because of the complicated material that does not allow for him to grasp the concept or freely make mistakes. Forcing children to learn what they need to in order to keep up a standard level of education for each age group (like the textbook example) can negatively affect the child, their wellbeing, and their self-esteem. When a child is forced to learn unwillingly, he may grow resentful towards members of authority and fear failure, hindering his social skills. A balance between leading the child through encouragement towards the right direction and allowing him to explore his options will help the child to grow up happy and to create a positive impact on the current society.

Corporal punishment in these days has been becoming a topic in many old timers talks. Many believe that it helps and is definitely the way to go. The older generations still seem to believe that society would be better off if kids still got punished the way they did. They refuse to ignore data that has not supported the clams they bring up about making children better behaved or as they call it “Straightening them up”. Many believe that our liberal democracy population has views that are not valid and that the old ways need to come back to help us grow.

The world has changed in many different ways, but there are still things that need to be changed for the better. Corporal punishment is one of those things. All around the world, corporal punishment is affecting children in many ways. It is described as a form of discipline that hurts a child in a way and is used both in homes and schools. It has been going on for years upon years and very few people try to stop it. People believe corporal punishment is good for children, but there have been so many negative outcomes that other people argue against it. Although some people believe that corporal punishment helps improve a child’s behavior, corporal punishment should not be used because it could be used excessively and it is ineffective.

Disciplinary tools have changed a lot since one hundred, or even fifty years ago. Corporal punishment was much more prominent and is still legal in nineteen states. Although corporal punishment may be more effective in getting students to stop bad behavior as compared to something like a detention, it has a host of negative impacts on students. According to hrw.org (human rights watch) corporal punishment can have harsh physical impacts, like deep bruising and bleeding, but mental impacts as well. Hrw.org also says that in relation to corporal punishment, it has been shown that students, “have reported subsequent problems with depression, fear and anger”, as well as diminishing student-teacher trust and a safe learning environment. We know the information from the past, but what does modern science have to say?

Corporal punishment is the use of physical discipline to make a child behave (Knox & Schacht, 2015). There are different methods of corporal punishment such as spanking, hitting, and much more. Although corporal punishment is used commonly by American families, it is not the best form of discipline. Therefore, corporal punishment should be against the law, for it can negatively affect the child’s mental state, can lead to more physical violence, and alternative forms of discipline lead to better results.

First, physical punishment is used to cause corporal pain to an individual. Physical punishment has become a major problem for children's health. Children have been beating so bad by their parents, that even left mark and bruises permanent on their body. Children bones are fragile since they are not finished developing yet. Physical punishment turns into child abuse once beatings become harsher (Afifi, Mota and Sareen). Secondly, when parents hit their child upside the head it will cause brain trauma. Brain trauma is triggered when a substantial number of forces are pressed on the brain.

Parents are afraid that if they don’t give their children harsh discipline they will grow to become incompetent members of society. This is a valid concern; no caregiver would ever want to see their child fail. Parents are also imperfect, they become frustrated and tired. Sometimes corporal punishment can be easier to dole out instead of a more productive strategy. What mostly keeps the cycle of corporal punishment going is the “My parents hit me and I turned out just fine” argument. If violent punishment is all someone has ever known, it’s understandable that they would turn to that form of discipline in adulthood. When looking at corporal punishment in this context it seems entirely justifiable; however, this would be ignoring a multitude of data that describes the

Corporal punishment is the stopping of unwanted child behavior by a parent by causing the child to feel physical discomfort. It includes spankings, slapping and beatings, fist, or object such as a belt, switch, hangers, and cord. In other words, a punishment by hitting. Others think the opposite it is effective. Therefore, if there’s no punishment towards the children their going to keep doing undesirable behavior and throw tantrums. However, in this case parents have control and show their children who’s in control and who commands. Hitting with belts, cords, and hangers is not the only solution there’s way to discipline. Imagine if there was not corporal punishment. How will the children turn out once they get older? Just think about it. Yes, corporal punishment towards children is effective because it prevents mistakes from repeating frequently, parents have control, and rational way to discipline.

“Whoever spares the rod hates their children. But the one who loves their children is careful to discipline them” (Proverbs 13:24). A good amount of parents in America would gasp in shock at such a statement and call it border line child abuse to use corporal punishment on a child. Across the states parents are split on this issues, “ Is it better to discipline your child by spanking or a different mellow approach, like telling the child no and expressing disappointment in a soft tone voice?” We will examine which style of parenting produces a well rounded child.

Corporal punishment has been around for centuries, and even though with the years there is a lot of advances and changes within the practices of the communities, sometimes it looks like we have not done great with the ways we educate and discipline our children. Research shows that the dangers for corporal punishment outweigh any benefit of instantaneous child obedience (Gershoff, Spring 2010). But if research continues showing the negative aspects of corporal punishment, why do we continue practicing it? Well, I have to start off by tradition, we practice it since the beginning of times, with our children, with women, with animals, etc. And the most common response about its benefits is that it stablishes discipline and respect for adults, however, in my way of seeing it, it creates nothing more than fear, resentment, anger, and frustration for not being able to speak up and stand for yourself.

Researchers have said that children exposed to more corporal punishment tend to suffer certain psychological disturbances. Generally, they are more likely to develop mental health problems, low self-esteem, and antisocial behavior. Such issues make them become vulnerable and depressive leading them in the long term to drugs or alcohol abuse. Once the children reach their adulthood, they become extremely aggressive and the parent-child relationship gets substantially damaged. In the United states a large number of people believe that such disciplinary practice is no longer present in our public schools’ system. According to a letter recently written by John B. King Jr., U.S. Secretary of Education, “twenty-two states still allow corporal punishment in school:

To start with, allowing teachers to use the corporal punishment causes physical damage on the student and abuses the child right. It is obvious that most punishments somehow results in pain. When I was in middle school, our math teacher Ms. Helen used to order us to solve a question by writing on the blackboard to show the other students. One day my classmate, Daniel was asked to solve a problem on the board, but he didn’t write a complete answer. Ms. Helen was so angry with him that she put her pen between his pointing and middle fingers and twisted it so tight. We were so terrified because we had never seen someone being punished like that before. Daniel couldn’t move his fingers and was taken to the hospital to fix his broken fingers. Our math teacher was fired right away for the excessive use of force on

Corporal punishment is a form of punishment used on children to correct bad behavior. The definition of corporal punishment is, a physical punishment , as flogging, inflicted on the body of one convicted of a crime (Dictionary.com). While several states strictly prohibit corporal punishment in schools, 44% of states in the U.S. still allow it to occur. Corporal punishment is an inappropriate way to correct bad behavior. However, almost 50% of the states in the U.S. still allow it to occur. Corporal punishment is always wrong to use in schools because it causes long-term negative effects on students, negative opinions of school or teachers, and it can increase the rate of crime and violence from students.