Pros And Cons Of Corporal Punishment

To spank or not to spank? The topic of corporal punishment is a controversial and sensitive matter in our society. No matter what day in age we live in it will continue to be a social problem. Corporal punishment, also referred to as spanking is deliberately inflicting pain on a person due to an inappropriate behavior or act they have done. This involves hitting, pinching, using switch cords, smacking, and etcetera. Those who are in favor of corporal punishment and believes that it should not be illegal, uses scriptures from the bible as justification. Supporters of corporal punishment feels as if spanking is an effective way to manage behavior. Those who are against spanking points out the negative, psychological issues, and mental

Corporal Punishment helps kids learn better because it is a quick punishment that you can get over fast so you can go back to class. It’s better than other punishments such as suspension, because if you get suspended you “miss school and you also miss instructions”(source B ) and you can not do your work.

Consistent use of corporal punishment has been an indicator of less effective parenting and is commonly linked to socialization out comes such as delinquency, low self-esteem, and social incompetence (Day 81).

As the saying goes, “if people are good only because they fear punishment [then] we are a sorry lot indeed” (Albert Einstein). The question is whether corporal punishment is necessary with so many other methods of discipline available. Is it effective? This is a much-debated issue between childcare specialists and parents alike. Corporal punishment, like spanking, should not be the preferred method of discipline as it does more harm than good.

However, using corporal punishment flexibly and appropriately is also necessary: it is important to disciplinary system; it is an effective tactic to discipline children, so it can reduce the incidence of child abuse; and it will not harm children who are under six but benefit them. Corporal punishment should not be prohibited because it is a safe and effective tactic to discipline children as long as parents use it rationally. If parents use it as the trump of their disciplinary system, use it in control, and only use it to teach children under six, spanking is a reasonable and viable option to teach children. Corporal punishment can be detrimental, but it also can beneficial to both parents and children. It only depends on how parents use

I feel that teachers who apply corporal punishment don’t know how to deal with children in an acceptable manner, they don’t possess the necessary tools to deal with the situation. They don’t follow the ethical code of SACE and take matters into their own hands. I feel that they use this tactic to scare children instead of engaging with them in a caring manner because they don’t have a passion for teaching and developing children. Sometimes teaching is just another job to

Other punishments aren’t as long-lasting.[d] For example, being suspended is like a vacation, students don’t learn anything. Being expelled offers students a longer vacation as they don’t need to go to school and just think about what they have done.[e] This has teachers waiting to keep them caught up as they finally come back from their suspension. In the article, “Corporal Punishment Persists in U.S. Schools” it states, “When students receive out of school suspension, they miss out on instruction time, and they teacher is not obligated in any way to help that student catch up,” This quote represents how tedious it will be and how ineffective having these suspensions and being expelled can bring. On the other hand, paddling brings a real threat to the students as it is something long-lasting and can permanently sting you in the future. It [f]demonstrates why students should do what they’re told

The main purpose of my essay is to illustrate the negative impact of corporal punishment, using my experience in Nigeria as a case study. I think the essay is tightly focused as I specifically talked about how corporal punishment negatively impacts people’s pain coping mechanisms. The theme I developed was corporal punishment as a vaccine for pain.

Teachers need to have all the time they can grasp in order to follow the curriculum for state tests (2016, p. 2) which is why schools feel detentions and suspensions sometimes take students away from learning and corporal punishments are a quick and effective punishment if allowed by parents. Most teachers claim “Discipline is necessary to keep children accountable, and to ensure that the few who refuse to follow directions do not unfairly hamper the chances of others to learn essential skills” (2016, p. 2). Because of this, corporal punishment does not take away from school time, although it is frowned upon more than detentions and suspensions.

Before discussing the effects of corporal punishment (CP) on children’s outcomes a distinction between CP and physical abuse (PA) must be established. Corporal punishment refers to behaviours that should not result in “significant injury” (Gershof, 2002). Straus, (1994) defines CP as “the use of physical force with the intention of causing a child to experience pain but not injury for the purposes of correction or control of the child’s behaviour”. Whereas, physical punishment, intentional behaviour or over-discipline that increases the chance of or leads to the infliction of injury can be classed as PA (Gershof, 2002; NCCNI (2000)

According to Smith, physical discipline among children was proven to cause aggression, damage to social relationships, poorer academic achievement, weak parent-child relationships, and development of internal problems such as anxiety or depression (n.d., para 1.). The negative long term effects that physical punishment produces are not worth the short period of time that a child complies. If more parents were informed on the damages that follow corporal punishment, this means of guidance and instruction could possibly decrease ensuring a higher quality of life for children in the future.

Is corporal punishment needed to discipline children? This is a very controversial question that is often debated. Even with as many arguments as there are against corporal punishment, there are also arguments for such punishment for children. This is something that tends to happen in both home and school settings. This type of punishment is very hurtful to the child and can have lasting effects on the child throughout their life. It can cause damage to relationships. It can also cause many different psychological problems as they get older. While some may not agree, there are other ways to discipline children that can be just as effective without causing any harm.

The trend has shifted more towards verbal lashings from the parents as opposed to physical ones. While corporal punishment rates have dropped, using it once again should be reconsidered within the American homes and legal system as it has proven to work in other countries around the world. Instead of viewing it as a bad thing, it should be seen in, rather, as a necessary tool to teach right from wrong.

Determining whether physical punishment is an appropriate form of discipline is an issue that exists worldwide. Some parents believe that there is nothing wrong in using physical punishment to discipline a child. They tend to believe that children learn best through pain and feel that physical punishment sets clear boundaries. Corporal punishment is also the least time consuming form of discipline. However, they are unaware of the immense damage they could be causing their children. Physical punishment should not be used as a form of discipline because it creates countless enduring

Corporal punishment is a form of punishment used on children to correct bad behavior. The definition of corporal punishment is, a physical punishment , as flogging, inflicted on the body of one convicted of a crime (Dictionary.com). While several states strictly prohibit corporal punishment in schools, 44% of states in the U.S. still allow it to occur. Corporal punishment is an inappropriate way to correct bad behavior. However, almost 50% of the states in the U.S. still allow it to occur. Corporal punishment is always wrong to use in schools because it causes long-term negative effects on students, negative opinions of school or teachers, and it can increase the rate of crime and violence from students.