The Importance Of Cutting Fine Arts In Schools

Section Two: History: Since public schools across the country have faced budget cuts in the past decade and a half, a common cost-cutting measure is to lessen the funding for arts education, prioritizing what are deemed more essential subjects such as math, reading, and science. Yet in fact, the current iteration of the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, also known as the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, lists that the arts are among the core academic subjects, requiring all schools to enable all students to achieve in the arts and reap all the benefits of a comprehensive arts education. Yet the economically prioritized curriculum is still draining the sources from these imperative programs leaving instruments, paintbrushes, and other artistic pieces in closets to collect dust, because no one will be there to teach or use them. Most impacting in the history of

All around the United States, art programs are being cut out of the budget in public schools. The arts include dance, band, chorus, theatre, film, drawing, painting, photography and literary arts. Some school board members feel these art programs are not necessary and do not benefit the students in any way. Elementary, middle, and high school students are forced to quit their passion and feel that their talents are not supported by their schools. Although many are not aware, there is a strong connection between arts education and academic achievement. Unfortunately, due to budget cuts in many public schools, the art classes are first on the list to be cut. It is important that the students, parents and teachers

Art programs around the United States are being shut down due to the lack of funding and misunderstanding of the subject. Many people think that the arts are just about drawing and painting. However, literature, performing arts, and media arts are on the list too. Students who are involved in an art curriculum are more likely to be successful in school than those who do not take them.

Although fine arts programs are being cut there is hope that the fine arts will continue to thrive trough the coming years. There are several successful fine arts programs throughout the country and they all have

Shelton, S. (2014, October-November). Art smart: art classes often aren't schools' top priority, yet research suggests perhaps they should be. State Legislatures, 40(9), 32+. Retrieved from http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A386917960/GPS?u=colu97977&sid=GPS&xid=4edbabfc

Some sports teams have gotten up to 50,000 dollars each year for each sport. Our arts programs get 5,000 all together. That includes band, choir, art, and all of our other arts programs. How come the arts programs don’t get as much funding from our schools as sports do? Fine arts programs are very good for students to be involved in, yet schools don’t give them enough money to actually sustain themselves. Studies show that kids involved in fine arts programs are happier, and do better in school, so why are fine arts programs being cut? For our final solution, we think that the arts programs should be given some of the funding from the sports teams. Because the sports teams have so much money from the schools and their boosters, they would have money to spare, which the arts programs rightfully deserve. If the sports teams were to give some of their funding to the arts programs, then it would be even. The sports teams would still have plenty of money for their needs, and the arts would get more to get what they need to be

Dave Dickson talks for the proponent’s argument about how if a school cuts a fine arts program it will save them money for a few years to use elsewhere in his

The arts require a large portion of the budget, not only to pay art teachers but also for the materials needed. Yet it doesn't receive the money it needs in view of the fact that a lot of people demean the prevalence of the arts in education claiming that in the real world the arts aren't essential. In recent years the budget cuts have made art education almost a fictitious concept. This is a problem that is critically wounding student's right to a well-rounded toolkit. "A well-rounded educational experience that includes the arts is closely linked to academic achievement, social and emotional development, civic engagement, and equitable opportunity" (Velasco). The benefits of the liberal arts are limitless, by riding schools of art programs, public education is restricting innovativeness and diminishing the limitless of

The arts provide a window into the lives and minds of others, and play a critical role in understanding the human experience. Our fine and performing arts programs give students the opportunity to develop existing skills, discover new ones, and let their imaginations take flight as they learn about others’ creative works and make their

The arts have been long-recognized as a vital component of the well-rounded student, but for the past several decades, the importance of arts programs in many U.S. schools has been steadily compromised (Rabkin & Redmond, 2006). Pressure to compete internationally has influenced educational institutions to believe that an almost exclusive focus on academic fundamentals is the sole way to raise standards and close the achievement gap (Sholl & Sweetland, 2016). Katz-Buonincontro, Phillips, and Witherspoon (2015) expound on the predicament of today’s schools: expected to promote twenty-first century skills, including creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration, leaders are simultaneously pushed to uphold standards-based

school with a fine arts program will have. The fine arts program also raise the grade in others

Fine arts isn’t really the best thing for education ( why ) what's there to learn, education is a really important thing some schools you have to pay but if you have fine arts then what the point you don’t learn anything in there right, if i gonna pay for a education i want learn something not color i mean for real. Some people care about education

Many students in school would enjoy taking classes in the arts, but unfortunately their schedule doesn’t allow

Art education has been proven to help with “cognitive ability, critical thinking, and verbal skills” as well as “motivation, concentration, confidence, and teamwork” (Smith). Having the ability and patience to sit down and paint a masterpiece or work through a song on the piano requires high focus and dedication. Students willing to do this will in turn have stronger skills to focus and be dedicated in other subjects. The mixture of all these abilities gained from participation in art programs lead to higher test scores and overall better performance in school. Still, these are only a few of the assets provided by art education.

An equivalent solution to solve the issue of under focused fine arts programs includes organizing a school’s current instruction time more efficiently within the school day. Schools could achieve efficiently using a combination of course integration and more planned and punctual lesson plans. Class time of Core subjects normally take precedent over arts classes and non Core subjects. Maximizing instructional time for all subjects would benefit the students and schools, despite the high cost it would require (Davis). It is sensible to spend time on funded areas, but is also important for students to receive a balanced education. In that case, some fine arts programs are limited to after school and