The Importance Of Democracy : The Best Form Of Government

There are many, many different Types of Government like an Absolute Monarchy and Dictatorship, but Representative Democracy is the most functional form of government. It is the best form of government because of the leader and the options that they give, the way the government is run, and that the citizens can make their own decisions.

Democracy: A political system in which citizens enjoy a number of basic civil and political rights, and in which their most important political leaders are elected in free and fair elections and accountable under a rule of law (26). In the studies we have undertaken, comparing and exploring various countries and systems politically, economically, and psychologically throughout the quarter, this outcry of democracy has prevailed as a main theme. Successful countries such as the United States and Great Britain are based upon such democratic ideals. It is no wonder that countries have striven more recently toward this goal of democratization. Both the Russian and Mexican revolutions prove that democracy is an attainable goal in the next

The authors also argue that the greatness of the government driven by democracy is the right to

The United States of America is not fully a democracy. People tend to vote for the issues and laws directly yet, most of the issues are resolved by representatives that are voted in by the people. Somehow, both of these are examples are a democracy, yet our country is mainly run by the second definition. However, republic has a better suited definition to the way our country works and allows things to be controlled. Republics have the power to vote for electives and others for the population to rely on. The federal government is a full on republic, however, looking more into state and local levels of governments, it is more along the lines of democracy. Yet, since the government that hold absolute power in the laws and decisions is mainly

Democracies are controlled by the people, and for the people, or so it is commonly defined. All people have their own opinions of how they think the government should work. Democracies symbolize freedom and justice as they appeal to the people. The first document, “The Gettysburg Address” focuses on the effects of the Civil War and how the people should react, instead of how the government is run. The second document, the “Funeral Oration”, explains how the people themselves could form the perfect democracy by Pericles standards. With this evidence in mind, the “Funeral Oration”, a speech given by Pericles, holds more extensive knowledge about the definition of democracy than Lincoln in “The Gettysburg Address”.

The Contemporary Democracy contains a balance of Democratic Capitalism and Socialism. In a contemporary democracy, we still have the right to our freedoms, but it is limited to ensure the protection of others. In example, the first amendment in the Bill of Rights, consents us the freedom of speech, but it does not protect us when we include seditious speech, fighting words, and obscenity. This form of Democracy also includes government help to meet the public’s needs as our population continues to grow at a rapid rate. We are able to obtain the resources that we have today thanks to governmental

The conflict between the balance of security and freedom within a society has been an enduring debate since civilization’s inception. Historically, many groups have had wildly differing opinions on the value of individual freedoms compared to the security of the collective. The source’s position is a theory on this balance. The author argues the adversity created from upholding civil liberties within a democracy threatens the security of the state, and that a strong leader with absolute rule would better serve the preservation of the state. This view strongly lines up with the ideological views of Thomas Hobbes, reflecting Hobbes idea of a “Leviathan”, a strong totalitarian leader serving as the most viable option for leadership. This idea

Dictatorships limit a citizens human rights, stripping a person of their natural rights. The effects of one’s life without the rights to life, liberty, and personal security may be seen in every aspect of their life. The impact of the right of life has on someone is vocalized in the novel, raising a discussion of how the right being violated would affect the quality of someone’s life

Regan and Henderson theorize that a regime will engage in more repression if its leaders sense a great political threat. While a typical autocracy allows zero expression of opposition and a democracy offers numerous channels for expression,

It has also been suggested that a basic feature of democracy is the capacity of eligible voters to participate freely and fully in the life of their society.[14] With its emphasis on notions of social contract and the collective will of the eligible voters, democracy can also be characterized as a form of political collectivism because it is defined as a form of government in which all eligible citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives.[15]

In “Two Concepts of Liberty”, Isaiah Berlin examines two different conceptions of freedom: positive and negative liberty. He begins by discussing negative freedom, which he defines as “the area within which the subject … is or should be left to do or be what he is able to do or be, without interference by other persons” (169). Under this definition, an individual is not free if he is coerced by another individual from making a decision he or she would naturally make. When discussing negative freedom, Berlin acknowledges that there is a fundamental level of freedom that is necessary for personal development that should not be intruded on by others (174). He contrasts this conception of negative freedom with positive freedom, which is concerned with “the source of control or interference that can determine someone to do, or be, this rather than that” (169). When discussing positive freedom, Berlin introduces the concept of the divided self, where an individual has two selves, a higher, rational self and a lower, instinctual self (180). Positive freedom focuses on the ability to develop the self-mastery over the lower self and appeals to the higher self. Berlin argues that the positive conception of liberty is flawed because the concept of appealing to the higher self can be abused when the idea of a higher and lower self is applied to a collective group or society (181). An authoritarian government can use the rhetoric of appealing to an individual’s or group’s higher self to

The rule of law means that the government nor the people are above the law. It also states that the government and its officials cannot force laws that are unjust or unfair. With this idea being enforced in the United States, no one is deemed inferior or more important than anyone else. Therefore, everyone is subjected to punishment that best fits their crime no matter their rank or status in society. With this unique idea, it is certain that everyone will get the justice that they deserve. To further show the exclusiveness of the rule of law, the United State’s system of government, which is a democracy, is going to be compared to militarism and absolute monarchy.

Mandatory voting has been a topic of debate in democratic countries since the creation of democratic republics themselves. Voting is a crucial part of democracy because it determines who will be the leaders of both the voters and nonvoters. It is the right of a citizen to vote, but whether or not it is the responsibility remains disputed. However, voting must be performed with a basic understanding of policy and what it takes for someone to fit the role which they are running for. Voting should not be compulsory because it results in more uneducated voting that counteracts the educated voting.

Throughout history different types of instrumental regimes have been in tact so civilizations remained structured and cohesive. As humanity advanced, governments obligingly followed. Although there have been hiccups from the ancient times to modern day, one type of government, democracy, has proven to be the most effective and adaptive. As quoted by Winston Churchill, democracy is the best form of government that has existed. This is true because the heart of democracy is reliant, dependent, and thrives on the populaces desires; which gives them the ability for maintaining the right to choose, over time it adjusts and fixes itself to engulf the prominent troubling issues, and people have the right of electing the person they

Churchill’s claim that “democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried” is deliberately provocative and intended to challenge the reader’s simplistic ideal that democracy is without faults. There are an estimated 114 democracies in the world today (Wong, Oct 3rd lecture). A figure that has increased rapidly in the last century not necessarily because democracy is the best form of government, but primarily for reason that in practice, under stable social, economic and political conditions, it has the least limitations in comparison to other forms of government. Be it the transparency of a democratic government or the prevalence of majority rule, all subdivisions of democracy benefit and hinder its