The Importance Of Energy Consumption In Nepal

Energy has easily become one of the most important necessities for our everyday lives. Without it we would simply not be able to have transportation or be able to gather any of our other resources that we depend on. If at anytime our energy supply ceases or no longer attainable the results may be horrific. However, it is quite easy to keep this from happening, It is crucial that our current population realize the importance of sustaining our present non-renewable resources. An examination of all the present energy issues and human impacts of energy conservation along with the a resource plan will show importance of energy

Energy is an important part of life producing the power of movement, heat, and production of electricity in many different ways. Therefore, choosing the correct source of energy is important for the environment and humans. Renewable energy that produces electricity never runs out, causing a lower environmental impact. Solar, Biomass, Wind, Geothermal, and Hydropower energy should be used globally to produce electricity. On the other hand, producing electricity from nonrenewable energy sources can be very harmful to humans and the environment. Humans can easily be dependent on it, which may not be the best option when it comes to finance, efficiency, sustainability and more. Approximately 52% of the US electricity comes from polluting sources like natural gas, oil, nuclear, and hydropower that have a lot of disadvantages effecting the environment in a negative way.

From the moment we wake up in the morning and turn our alarm clock off, to the moment we turn the lights off and fall asleep, we are using energy. Throughout the day an average person will use a cell phone, a computer, a television, an oven or microwave, and many will ride in a car or bus: all of this takes energy. Energy is even being used while we sleep to power the same alarm clock that wakes us up each morning. Individuals in first world countries are large consumers of energy, but where does it all come from? What powers most of our modern day conveniences? The United States Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that as much as eighty-two percent of the United State’s energy demand is met by using fossil fuels (Fossil Fuels), and in 2012, fossil fuels made up eighty-seven percent of the energy consumed worldwide (Gonzalez & Lucky, 2013). What are fossil fuels then?

Everyone uses a lot of power for lighting, heating, machines, movements, and so much more. All of that energy has to come from an energy supply. Some energy resources are renewable, while others are non-renewable. Energy has various forms and is a very essential part of our everyday lives.

In conditions when both technologies and our needs require more and more energy, it is impossible to count only on natural resources and to think that their reserves are unlimited. This is not true. We have learned to receive electricity from irreplaceable resources – oil, gas, also from replenished - water, wind, sun. But the energy of the sun or wind is not enough for today’s rythm of our civilization. And hydroelectric and thermal power plants are not as clean and economical for the modern rhythm

For many years, energy has been a need for people everywhere. What has become of the world today is due to the revolution in energy use. There are two types of energy non-renewables and sources-renewables. An example of a non-renewable is coal and it is a great type of fossil fuel the reason being is because it is a reliable source of electricity. Examples of renewables are wind,water and solar power. Renewables can be recovered and reused while on another hand a non-renewables can not be used again. Coal has been used for thousands of years archaeologists discovered that coal was used even in the second and third centuries by the Romans. Solar power is a renewable source since it’s powered by the sun. It can be changed into other forms for example both heat and electricity can come directly from the sun. The sun’s power has been used for a lifetime to heat up our homes, water (to drink and bathe), and our food as well. Both energy sources-coal and solar-are quite reliable resources, and are used very much. As worldwide energy sources, coal and solar power share similarities and differences when it comes to having a huge impact on the environment the world's economic status within how much money we profit from them and human health such as increased lung cancer rates.

Energy, especially from fossil fuels, is a key ingredient for all sectors of a modern economy and plays a fundamental role in improving the quality of life in less developed economies. In 2007, India is ranked fifth in the world in terms of energy demand; accounting for 3.6% of total energy consumed, and is expected to grow at 4.8% in the future. India imports 70% of the oil it uses, and the country has been hit

So how many types of energy sources do we use throughout our day? There are so many variances in today’s world for energy sources and options. We use energy such gas, diesel, and ethanol to power cars; electricity to charge our cell phones, light our homes in the dark, and watch television. We possibly use natural gas to cook our food and heat our homes and water. These are all non-renewable sources of energy. They are also referred to as fossil fuels as they are derived and extracted from coal, oil, and natural gas. Fossil fuels make up a large portion of today’s energy market, although promising new renewable

Additionally, there are many other contributing factors to poor health in rural areas beyond direct health care impact. The Pan-American Health Organization states that in 2015, 97% of urban Latin Americans compared to only 84% of rural Latin Americans had access to an improved drinking water source, meaning water protected from outside contamination, especially concerning fecal matter. Additionally, regarding improved sanitation, when excrement is sufficiently separated from human contact, 88% of urban populations had access while only 63% of rural populations had the same. Fifty-one percent of rural citizens still use solid fuels, such as wood, dung, or charcoal, for cooking and heating their homes compared to just 8% of urbanites. The indoor air pollution from these fuels put users at increased risk of many respiratory diseases and other health complications (PAHO, 2016). Furthermore, rural cultures often value self-sufficiency and independence, leading to less utilization of available health care services (Strasser, 2003). Lower levels of education compound this issue as people may have a poor understanding of what resources are available as well as how and when to use them. These factors combine to put rural residents at higher risk for many health complications and lower the overall health status of the

In my everyday life, some energy sources I commonly use are natural gas, electricity, and oil. Natural gas is used to heat my home and cook meals in the kitchen. Electricity is used all over my house to light a room or power electronics. I use oil almost daily when I drive my car, although luckily I usually do not have to drive very far. None of these that I use are renewable energy sources. The oil and natural gas are examples of fossil energy. Electricity often is generated through the conversion of other energy sources, such as fossil fuels, which makes it a secondary energy source (Energy Sources, n.d.). I often do not put much thought into my energy uses, as I usually take it for granted.

Another pro argument of deforestation is the issue of fuel wood in rural areas. The use of fuel wood in the growing cities contrasts strictly with the more familiar patterns of rural areas. The growth of energy used in rural household still dominates the energy budgets of many developing countries, especially in the poorer countries such as Nepal, Bangladesh, Ethiopia and Nigeria. Most fuel wood is used in the household. The concept of an energy transition, however, is central to any understanding energy in urban areas. As

Such promising prospects led a group of researchers from the EcoAndina Foundation to conduct an experiment in one of the most remote places on earth, the Puna region of Argentina, in order to gauge the effectiveness of solar cookers where high elevations made it difficult to to procure wood and shrubbery for burning. Using new SolCoDat technology, they measured departures from average carbon emissions from the burning of biomass after prolonged use of solar cookers by the few inhabitants of a village. The use of forty cookers registered a decrease in carbon emissions of 3.8 tons/yr/cooker for a total of almost 200 tons/year for the whole village. Even after the conclusion of the experiment, the villagers maintain the cookers and still use them, showing that communities can indeed improve their quality of life with the use of solar energy (SIONs of Sustainability: Solar Cooker). Of course, that is not the only instance exhibiting the successful implementation of solar cooking devices. Within the war-torn countries of Chad and Sudan, refugees are congregating by the hundreds of thousands into sprawling refugee camps. The inhabitants of those camps, specifically females, were charged with finding usable wood and dung for use as fuel for fires in the camp. They would have to trek for miles upon miles in search of

“How does the Starlight Stove score on each of these factors?” The product appears to offer a strong relative advantage as compared to alternatives. Although the health benefits may be difficult for users to immediately appreciate, the potential economic value generated by spending less time collecting fuel and having longer working days should be more apparent. The stove’s features fit with existing values and experiences, but the production of electricity does not fit well. These closely correlate with complexity. How the product actually works and the benefits it offers may not be understood without further explanation. The product is not something that users can easily experiment with. Observability might be moderate – possibly depending upon the extent to which Nepalese invite others into their homes.

There are large numbers of consumer in and around Pune city who are using Conventional Source of Energy. Many of them are using conventional and Non-Conventional Source of Energy. As Compared to Conventional Source of Energy users Non-Conventional Energy Source User are quite less in number.

With an annual population growth of 1.3 percent (United Nations 2013), India’s energy needs are growing, especially in regards to electricity. Because new energy gains require multiples of power use, for the Indian economy to expand, electricity production has to rise more rapidly than total output. Thus far, areas of India remain in the dark: the “rise of 122 percent in [electric] generation [has been] insufficient for continued expansion” (DeVotta, 138). Still, the electricity sector has grown substantially since independence. Installed capacity in 1950 was 1,713 megawatts; by 2002 it had grown to 104,918 megawatts (Kale 2004). However, per capita annual electricity consumption, which increased from approximately 13 kilowatt-hours in 1951 to 365 kilowatt-hours in 2001, remains low. At the federal level, India’s government has initiated a major policy initiative to make electricity generation and supply commercially viable. As part of the 2001 Energy Conservation Act, the government outlined an ambitious plan for achieving 100 percent village-level electrification by the end of 2007 and total household