Women have an impact on the political realm because of their different leadership styles, their different approaches to how to be a legislator, and the different way they prioritize issues based on their unique perspectives. These impacts are left out if women are not in office and do not have a seat at the table. This lack of descriptive representation leads to a lack of substantive representation on various policy issues such as public policy in education, the wage gap, and family law, as well as in reproductive rights, and gendered violence. Without women in office, these problems will continue to rise as men tend to not prioritize these issues which leaves them unheard or unresolved. I argue that institutional barriers such as term limits, committee placements, party platforms, and professional legislatures only add to this problem. This is because once women are in office they still have very little say because of their lack of leadership roles or high committee placements, their obligation to vote the way their party does, and commitment to their family which keeps them
“You have to be true to yourself” (BrainyQuote). This is a quote by Hillary Rodham Clinton, a very important woman in the decade of the 1990s. Many events occurred in the 1990s that still impact the entire world today.
In reality, however, women are equally and in some ways more qualified to hold leadership positions than men. Although there is no single explanation for why women are underrepresented in politics, the gender gap in the political arena stems from the lack of female participation in elections as women are often discouraged or feel threatened by society to run for political office. Young women who aspire a career in politics encounter both structural and emotional barriers, which prevent them from running for political office. Women battle issues of self-confidence, face stereotypes, and derive false perceptions of political campaigns, all of which broaden the gender gap in the political
There have been many significant strides since 1970 when women occupied almost no major elective positions in U.S. political institutions. Today’s society has reflected remarkable changes in women’s equality and acceptance. In 2008, Hillary Clinton received 18 million votes when she fought for presidency of the Democratic Party . In 2011, Sarah Palin was listed at the top of her candidates for the Republican presidential nomination. However, women are consistently being underrepresented in the political world reaching beyond just the federal level. Clyde and Thomas attest the underrepresentation to two basic reasons: lack of political ambition as well as historic exclusion of women from professions that tend to lead toward the political arena . Three central barriers contribute to the difficult road ahead for the
She has also put her agenda to strengthen unions and protect workers bargaining power. Hillary wants to protect the worker from employer misclassification, wage theft and other various forms of exploitations. She will fight for all hard working americans should deserve a secure and comfortable retirement plan.
In one corner we have Hilary Clinton, if she wins than she would be the first female president for the U.S (which would be a big achievement for women hear at the U.S), but no good will come from that. Here are some examples of why. When her husband was governor, she took a $100,000 bribe that was paid to her via shifty dealings. She has done nothing that has made her qualified to be the president, the only reason she got elected for senator of New York was because her husband was president once. She became Secretary of State and did
Within the past 50 years, there has been an increasing amount of women in the government. Whether these women hold powerful positions such as Secretary of State, or hold minor positions such as PTA President, a political revolution is brewing. The United States of America is lacking substantially with regards to females in office, in fact if one were to look statistically at the amount of women in the government, the United States is failing tremendously. Although the United States likes to claim that they are the land of opportunities, it seems as if the only ones reaping those benefits are cis white males. But, there are women who choose to break the glass ceiling and attempt to explore the opportunities that are in front of them, and one
First I used Fallacies in the Debate: Hillary Clinton video on YouTube and she used red herring. Red herring is responding to an issue with an irrelevant argument meant to distract. The way she uses red herring is when the guy on the left of the screen says that governor Webb said she has never used military force in Libya and that the attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi was inevitable. He also asked her if she should have seen that attack coming. She responded by saying, that we had a murderous dictator Qaddafi has apparently killed many Americans.
The second presidential debate demonstrates an indecisive clash between opposite personalities; the rehearsed demeanor of Hillary Clinton juxtaposes the raw audacity of Donald Trump. Despite their dissimilar appearance, the candidates employ like strategies – they deflect accusations and criticize their adversary. Clinton suffers to succeed in this format. Neither knowledge of policy nor experience in office effectively counter accusations against personal character. This observation is nonetheless irreverent. Although Trump dominates the debate format, he alienates the electorate.
Perhaps one of the most interesting times in a president’s administration is during the end of his term in office. Having reached the ultimate goal in a politician’s career, a president no longer has to worry about public opinion or any of the other political give and takes that usually influence a politician’s actions. He is truly free to act as he pleases almost free of consequences. Bill Clinton’s final days in office certainly demonstrated this fact. Using the ultimate unchecked executive power of clemency Clinton issued over 140 pardons and thirty six sentence commutations. He protected over a million acres of land through the creation of six new national monuments. He also nominated nine new federal
The promise to promote a full immigration reform that can lead to equal citizenship is an essential priority for Hillary Clinton. “The American people support comprehensive immigration reform not just because it’s the right thing to do… it will strengthen families, strengthened our economy, and strengthened our country.”
As the presidential election draws near, there comes a time when we, the American people, must decide what we desire in a leader. Many factors come into play when choosing the specific characteristics that our commander-in-chief must exhibit in order to protect the United States and make it prosper. Firstly, with an unforeseen rise in the audacity of terrorist groups, our president must be skilled in quick-decision making; the well-being of her people must come before all else. Secondly, our president must be utterly candid and honest with her citizens; cronyism has shaded the eyes of the people for far too long. Finally, with trillions and trillions of dollars in debt, our president must be well-acquainted with the best and most cost-effective route to economic and financial stability. Hillary Clinton brandishes not a single one of these impetuses to the vitality of America; furthermore, she cannot be president or our country will fall apart at its very foundation.
of the system but she should help those who really need it. I want to believe that my vote really makes a difference,
The Democratic and Republican Party primaries are over. America is left with two main candidates to choose from in the upcoming U.S. presidential election this coming November: Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. As of right now, both candidates are still considered “presumptive” in their respective parties until each party holds their national convention and officially nominates them. Barring a Hillary Clinton indictment, one of those two will become the next president of the United States.
In conclusion to this research paper, Hillary Clinton strongly has the views of political rationalism, because she is so educated in law and politics she encompasses the political activity and capacity and the broad disposition to act in politics on the basis of rational belief when it comes to policy making. As such, theories of political rationalism are apt to be as varied as theories of rationalism sans phrase. This fact seems to have been largely ignored by critics of political rationality, who often paint with a very broad brush indeed. In particular, and most important for present purposes, anti- or non-rationalist strains in recent political theory have evinced little interest in, and make virtually no reference to, a variety of enormously