The Importance Of Innovating A Firm With The Use Of R & D Project

There are various internal and external factors that can influence the development of innovations positively or negatively. External factors may include firm size, market structure, degree of industry concentration, and macroeconomic factors. Size of the firm tend to be more positive related to innovation in manufacturing and profit-making organizations as compared to non-profit making organization, and relationship that involves size and innovation will become stronger if a non-personnel or a long transformation measure of size has been applied, as compared to application of a personnel or a raw measure of size. Depending on the competition within the market for example a positive competition with favorable atmosphere, the firm will be successful in its kind of innovation. The way industries have been structured and how they change over time may have effect to the innovation among organizations. Their standards, the institutional setting and the process of liberalization and privatization also affect innovation.

Business demands a return on its research and development effort to be successful and repay those investors of time or money thus

Moreover, we must make sure the research and development department have enough funds to operate. In order to act as a science resource centre for the government, the R&D department needs to do a lot of researches and these researches require a huge amount of money.

For this assignment, you will research the innovation architecture of at least three companies that are well-known for successfully supporting a culture of innovation. Write a 1,500-word paper that addresses the following:

firms It has been suggested that the disappointing performance of U.S. firms during the 1980s in technology-intensive, global markets was from failure to improve upon products and processes. It has been cited that "the U.S. makes the breakthroughs, while other countries, especially Japan, provide the follow-through." Revolutionary innovation has been contrasted with less dramatic advancements. Incremental improvement can turn products over and get more, newer models out. This may all sound dull, but the achievements can be exhilarating. American firms may have failed to follow up on their breakthroughs with such continuous improvements. Where there were successes, they were built upon a combination of breakthroughs and incremental improvements. It is the subject of yet another discourse as to what constitutes an innovation: a breakthrough or an incremental improvement, or both, and/or everything in between. 4. To take advantage of opportunity It is no surprise that surprises, often disappointing surprises, are the seeds of innovation. Take the oil companies. It is no surprise that some oil companies are becoming oil-andgas companies. Why? Because gas is found more often and in greater abundance than oil

However, RLK’s competitors are downsizing and outsourcing R&D and exploiting on the cost advantages. If RLK decides to invest more money into R&D and should the new product stall on launch,

Technological change is a fundamental driver of economic development and performance, not only at the level of firms and industries but also economies. Innovation is the organizational process through which new

In the early 1970s the process of industrial innovation was commonly assumed as the “linear progression”, through development of technology in organizations, to marketplace, that became the “technology push model”. And in “mid 1960s- early 1970s period” appears 2ndgeneration of “Innovation model”, alluded to as "market pull innovation model”. In accordance with “simple sequential model”, the marketplace was new ideas as a source for controlling “R&D” that had a responsive role in innovation process. That is “demand pull” model. Individuals obtained this theory due to their restricted vision then. They considered science as the origin and cause of innovation. Consequently they believed that high investment leads to novel innovative product production (Balconi, Brusoni & Orsenigo 2010). Clearly, the one reason of innovation is scientific research. In the 20th century, several big companies, like “Ford, Philips, ICI and Western Electric”, put money on the research laboratory. They fed the quickly emerging markets for vehicles, industrial chemicals and electrical products for consumers with the “science and technology” assistance and structured efforts for “research and development” built steady innovation streams. The other main aspect is demand, where it can be easily understood. The needs of

Although universities are recognized for being institutions of higher learning, those working at research universities have the distinct privilege of witnessing the unfolding of new discoveries through basic and fundamental research. As researchers seek funding to support graduate students, build and utilize laboratories, and conduct cutting-edge research, the federal government strives to stay ahead in science, technology, and medicine. Consequently, university researchers often look to receive federal funding for their research ideas. Driven by the creation and dissemination of information, research universities provide the foundational data on which innovative ideas can launch into tangible products and services. On the other side of the fence, industry leaders seek to solve problems as well as generate profits for their businesses. Still noble in their pursuit of knowledge and information, industry researchers bring a different perspective and experience to the research enterprise. Both institutions play an integral role to improving and saving lives through the advancement of science and technology; imagine the potential when these two establishments work together, leveraging one another’s resources! The University-Industry Demonstration Partnership (UIDP) put together a “Research Quick Guide” to “promote greater understanding of the issues that face both parties in order to facilitate more effective collaborations for mutual benefit.” (UIDP,

These R&D labs usually concentrated on bringing out new technologies for self-commercialisation. This process can be viewed in the form of a funnel, where a large number of varied ideas and concepts can be trimmed down to few of those concepts and ideas that best meet the requirements of the company. (OECD, 2008) In recent times, companies have become more open with their innovation process, leading to revolution described as “Open Innovation” by Chesbrough (2003). This ‘open innovation’ model is a more dynamic model when compared the traditional model as there is much more interaction between knowledge assets outside the company as well as inside. Henry Chesbrough (2003) in his book “Open Innovation: New Imperative for creating and profiting from technology” defines open innovation as a concept in which companies must use ideas from inside as well as outside sources and find internal and external ways to reach the market in order to advance their technological capabilities. Open innovation combines these 3

First, it takes an extremely long time to develop a new drug, and only a very small portion of all projects is successful. Projects that the company starts today will determine its financial performance 10-15 years later. Therefore, careful planning of R&D projects is very important for the long-term stability of the company.

Research and development helps with predicting the cost and the effectiveness of the approach on the system. The idea is that the research and development will increase students’ future accomplishment.

Innovation offers the companies a competitive advantage. Presently and within the future, more than any time in history, the key to competitive advantage is innovation. However innovation will facilitate businesses meet all of their strategic challenges, not simply competition; to illustrate, in confronting accelerating rates of change, globalization, apace advancing technology, a additional numerous workforce, associated a modification from an industrial to a knowledge-based economy. Meeting all of those challenges helps the firm attain competitiveness, and meeting these challenges suitably depends on innovation. Innovation allows a firm to workout its challenges in distinctive ways in which build competitive advantage either through relative differentiation, a relative low-priced position, or few acceptable level of each. Innovation cannot assure success, however success cannot be achieved within the end of the day without it.

Research and Development (R&D) is known by most as the steps taking by the company or organization to discover and create new products. “The performance of, incentives for, and the contributions of R&D are topics that are widely studied in management, economics, and other social science disciplines. Total spending on R&D

Although R&D has been retained by the large pharmaceutical firms, there has been a continuous decline in the R&D productivity. Controlling R&D is imperative to the success of a Pharmaceutical firm. However, as the pharmaceutical industry is maturing, there are diminishing returns to the R&D investment. Fewer and fewer blockbuster drugs are being discovered and therefore R&D is not the most value adding component in the value