The Importance Of Literature In Literature

In the article, “Why Literature Matters” by Dana Gioia, Gioia argues that the decline of interest in art in young Americans is a major problem. Gioia uses polls, studies, and a quotation from a credible author in order to illustrate this point. Gioia’s overall purpose in writing this article is to highlight the lack of art interest in young Americans. His primary audience would most likely be the American people, with an emphasis on millennials.

Reading and writing have played monumental roles in the game called my life. For as long as I can remember, I have been reading or writing, whether it was showcasing my reading skills to my grandparents when I was six, or teaching myself calligraphy when I was thirteen. English literature and all the things it encompasses has always mattered to me, and (almost always) has been a source of my happiness. According to Dana Gioia from “Why Literature Matters, ” more and more young adults are starting to feel the opposite—that reading literature is not interesting and doesn’t matter. “During the past quarter century...the interest young Americans showed in...literature…[has] diminished.” To support this claim that literature matters, Gioia

The passage, “Why Literature Matters”, argued about why literature matters and how it could affect the society. In the beginning of the passage, the author establishes the problem and the proof of the problem. In the middle of the passage the author talked about how and why literature matters with proofs and evidences. And, in the end of the passage, the author talked about the effects of illiteracy on the society. Dana Gioia used facts, evidence, and call to action to persuade his audience that the decline of reading will have a negative effect on society.

Liuzza begins his article by telling the reader that when a person translates a novel, all their shortcomings and biases are put on public display. What gave him the most anxiety while translating, however, was the “vague thing usually called tone”.

Literature has its roots in one language and the language gets life through literature. Literature and language are closely interconnected. Language skills can not be taught in isolation but in an integrated manner, which includes a set of text-based, student -centered activities to add new impetus to teaching language through literature, stimulating the desire of students reading and encourage their responses. Literature can be used to teach the language through interesting activities such as prediction and finishing a story, choosing some interesting role-plays, the integration of spelling with vocabulary, grammar learning through passages of text literary, crossword puzzles, brainstorming,

A text which has been taken from one context and translated The process of translation allows new insights into the original text and emphasises contextual differences between the two.

Oftentimes, examining a piece of literature art can be troublesome— what insightful discovery is the author trying to reveal? Is there a deeper, more profound truth to the on-the-surface details provided? Is there a truth at all? To New Historicists, the “truth” of a past or foreign culture can never be confirmed as established or unchangeable. At best, any understanding of the “truth” is a matter of interpretation based on both the reader and the writer. Additionally, while the literary work under consideration does indeed reflect the culture in which it was written, it also participates in the culture in which it was written. In this complex level of historical perspective, culture and literature

Through the means of intervention, the mediation of translation serves as a nexus between authorial intent and imposed cultural meaning. Therefore, it then creates a suspension of meaning. The act of translation does not in any way signify absolute meaning. Instead, translation gives two different versions of the same text that encourages the reader to decide upon which one best suits their reading. Baudelaire, in similar fashion, offers two different interpretations of pleasure in “The Double Room” that then leads to the piece’s moral suspension.

The necessary basics a writer must consider are audience and purpose as both of these are the foundation of a writers work. For proper consideration, he or she must determine whom they are directing their work towards and the purpose of their writing. Purpose is not what a writer wants to do, it is what the writer wants the audience to do as a result of the interpretation of the writer’s theme. A writers purpose is the reason for communicating with someone and it will determine what they write about. A writer may want to inform, persuade, or express an idea. On the other hand, it is necessary for the writer to understand their audience. The audience is the person or people the writer is trying to communicate with. It is important for the writer

Under the influence of “cultural turn”that greatly expands the width and breadth of translation studies, translators and scholars have gradually realized that translation, literary translation in particular, is a sort of “creative treason”: creative in the sense that the translator must make subjective efforts to

What is literature, and why should people read it? These two questions normally surface on the first day of English and literature classes. In fact, as one Introduction to Literature class ended the 2017 Spring semester with student presentations, the final presenter, a middle-age auto mechanic with oily stained hands and a battered countenance, exclaimed most eloquently, “Literature is an alive and breathing thing. It gives life to the past and the present. It makes me know, feel, and love. Without literature, I would be nothing.” Juxtaposed appearance versus thought shows the power and impact of literature. Without literature, we would be nothing; we would have no thought, feelings, or life. By reading, sharing, discussing, and writing, literature breathes life into the breathless. Students are not the only ones who grapple with these questions. What is literature? - is the very question Terry Eagleton opens with in his book Literary Theory: An Introduction. Moving away from the nontraditional student, how does a prominent professor and esteemed literary critic answer the same question? Remarkably, he dittos that of the mechanic. In Eagleton’s opening chapter “The Rise of English,” he responds in much the same way by asserting literature’s “task is to transform society in the name of those energies and values which art embodies” (17). Eagleton adds further elaboration to his view of literature’s development and definition; in his chapter “The Rise of Literature” he

Interrelations between literatures and society are duly assimilated and endorsed in different epochs of time. Society is well exposed through literatures and literatures do strongly uphold the social realities. Reading any piece of literatures is always supposed to reflect this or that type of social account: be that of present or past or future time or with blending of all. For the reason, Tyson writes, “A better understanding of the world in which we live, it seems to me, automatically comes along the ride when we study literature… (xii), and then cements the feeling that studying literature is a most enjoyable way of accessing the world. Winch argues that the interrelation between history, philosophy, literature and social theory is vital to a better understanding of our social worlds (Winch 1990); and he well supports the feeling as Tyson regards over literature as to be the mirror to reflect society in part or whole. So feel the literary figures and expose society from various angles through literatures.

Although I take honors language arts classes, reading and writing is not my forte. As someone who naturally gravitates towards math, I try to find definitive answers to questions. Unfortunately, in literature there is never just one answer. The beauty of literature that appeals to a lot of people is that there is usually never a wrong answer or interpretation of a text. Anyone, including myself, can find a unique connection, symbol, or meaning in a piece of literature. The only thing that you can’t connect literature to is mathematics. A piece of writing is never as easy as x=5 or plugging in a formula to interpret a text, and though it might seem like an obvious enough statement about literature, I just recently learned this lesson. About a year ago I walked into Mr. Harbison’s classroom for the first time, completely unaware that his class was about to be the hardest, most stressful, and anxiety inducing class that I would take, I was also unaware that his class would be the most important class that I took coming into high school.

Mostly, parent believe teaching literature to kid is hard and blame technology, social media to keeping their kids diverted these days, which is completely wrong. Because, parents and teachers are unable to teach literature kids and students not being enough involving and connected, which is making parents and teachers hard to teach the literature. That is why, instructors needs to be attentive in his or her classroom toward to non native to make the students involving to build them as effective readers and parents needs to take time from daily busy work schedules for their kids to getting closer to them and recognize and break their barrier that stopping them to read literature. Nowadays, many kids highly engaged themselves with social media and technology lack of their parents attention that create weak communications with their child, fail to create bond between them to compel their kids to listen to them that could allow to mold their kids better strong individual in community by educate about cultures that is all inside literature. And, people from different culture also find harder to read due to not getting proper attention and poor teaching system, which is making harder student to read literature lack of understanding ability to non native or students with learning disability. So, it is very important for parents and teachers to be involving and attentive toward their kids and any students to teach literature or to make effective reader to read any complex text.

Since there is no a definitive translation of any text, multiple translations can allow us to conceive the original text (even if we don’t know the language of the source text). "The study of multiple translations substantially enlarges the interpretive process and perspectives that readers draw from the text" (Schulte 1994). In other words, comparing various translations of the same text as in (Charles Baudelaire Correspondence, A Multiple Reading of Rainer Maria Rilke 's “The Panther”, Gaius Valerius Catullus, and Gustave Flaubert, “Madame Bovary”) provide a clear understanding of the different perspectives of the translators. For me, this comes as no surprise, because each translator has a different technique as well as dissimilar perspective. Close reading is the key success to produce an accurate translation because it allows us to dig deeper into the text. Clearly enough, the above translations are not all exactly the same, nor are completely different. Some translators in their translations stick for a literal word-for-word translation of the source text, as in the Trot while, others take a freer style. Adding to that, the multiple translations show us how the personal imagination of the translators impacts their interpretation. That is, within the translation process the translators affected directly with their personal perception and visualization of selecting the appropriate meaning of the original text. Therefore, personal perception plays a