The Importance Of Media Writing

In an era of global technology, instant news, infomercials, electronic town meetings, and “Made for TV Documentaries,” the borderlines between news and analysis, news and entertainment, news and fiction are constantly shifting.

However, raising taxes on the rich and corporations is not as helpful to our economy as most people think. Although raising taxes on the top percent of people and companies appears to create more income for the government, the result will make it harder for middle class and lower class citizens to grow. Some argue that by combining several key changes, including the simplification of the tax code to avoid loopholes and the decrease of taxes on the rich and corporations, there will be an improvement in the national economy. Although this may seem a bit counterintuitive, it makes more sense when looked at closely. By lower taxes and remove all loopholes, smaller businesses are given further opportunities to grow instead of facing financial roadblocks and government

Last Tuesday, I attempted to unplug myself from the world of media and see how it affected my everyday life. After trying to disconnect myself from everything that involves media, I realized how much I rely on it to get me through each day. I was never this aware of its presence in today’s society until disconnecting myself. Without media to rely on, I found myself having to readjust my whole normal routine just to get through the day.

Assignment: As the documentary Miss Representation explains, “The media is now the message and the messenger.” Every day, we take in countless hours of media that influence how we view others and in turn how we view ourselves. It is our responsibility to consume media in an intelligent way AND fight back against negative messages put forth by the media.

The debates on tax cuts are making their way to headlines of every radio station, newspaper, and television station in America. Today, tax cuts would only benefit the wealthy and wouldn’t really benefit the lower class. “The administration and it’s congressional alleys are proposing to sharply reduce taxation of the business income primarily benefiting

Writing skills such as selection and slanting are often used by the press in reporting news. The role of the media is to inform the public on what is going on since we live in an era that information is the driving force of economic advancement. In Birk and Birks essay, they describe the criteria and pattern that is used by the press in their news development, which is selection, slanting and charged language. Selection is a way we formulate an idea based on

Clive Thompson and Neil Postman are authors who discuss specific mediums through writing. Postman writes about the television and newspaper and Thompson writes about the internet age. Both of these authors use the same approach on their respected mediums. In comparison they both have the same piece of writing. Comparing side by side, it reveals a bigger idea that the communication medium always outweigh the cons.

This new tax plan brings a slew of new tax reforms. Despite the tax cuts, it seems as if high earners and corporations will walk away from this tax reform with the best outcome. people who make less than 30,000 will be hurt by this plan the New York Time says, “Americans earning

The George W. Bush administration is remarkably renowned for passing a major tax-cuts package, known as the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, (Bartels, 2005, p. 19). The package postulated a reduction in the federal income tax rates, increment in the child credits, augmented tax-free retirement contributions and the educational savings account, as well as a gradual elimination of the US estate tax. The entire tax package was to cost the US Treasury over $1.3 trillion (excluding interest) up to 2010, the expected expiry time of the package. If the system was to continue in the later years, the Treasury could end up spending over $200 billion each year. According to Bartels (2005), The Bush move was supported by the ordinary citizens before the passage of the package. The people’s support was not meant to imply the way they were impressed with the package as contributing to inequality, as they were mainly concerned with their own individual welfare. Notably, they wanted a system that could relieve them from paying massive or burdensome amounts of taxes. Though contrary to the perception of the legislation by the people and their personal preferences regarding it, 36% of the tax benefits were to accrue to the richest, who comprised only one percent of the American population. The share was almost equal to the one that was received by those in the bottom who constituted around 80% of the population (Hacker & Pierson, p. 33).

Mostly from the spending money of middle-class consumers. And where does the spending money of middle-class consumers come from? From middle-class incomes”(Ettlinger). Tax cuts would raise income levels, if these tax cuts were focused on the middle class, they would have more money available to spend. If the middle class had more money available to spend, it would add money into the economy and create jobs thus expanding the tax base which would bring in more revenue for the government and help citizens. Another simple fix to the federal tax plan would be to slightly raise the corporate tax rate. The corporate tax rate should be kept at a low level, as it gives businesses more money with which to raise their employees’ incomes and to create new jobs. However, raising it slightly would allow the government to bring in more revenue, “And with each percentage point reduction in the corporate rate representing $100 billion in revenue over a decade, a move to a 22.5% rate would generate another $250 billion in revenue while still substantially leveling the global playing field for U.S.

Government tax cuts and taxation on the middle class always seems to be the debate in every election year in the U.S. This debate is always related to the federal deficit and our national debt. The pro side of the argument is that if you cut taxes the revenue generated for the government will fall and it will then expand national debt. But in the counter arguments on cutting taxes can stimulate the economy, leading to an increase in government revenue with the redux in tax rates. According to Forbes article “Do Tax Cuts Increase Government Revenue?” “Using the data from 1913 through the end of 2011, the correlation between the maximum marginal income tax bracket and total Federal receipts is a negative 0.50. In simple terms, when taxes are cut, Federal revenue has a very strong tendency to rise! And when taxes are raised, government revenue has a strong tendency to fall.” ("Forbes Welcome", 2016). I believe the tax cuts proposed to the 95% of the country will have the intended a stimulus effect on economic consumer spending which leads to an increase in government revenues and eventually work its way down to a rise in the real GDP. The tax cut policy should generate revenue and show positive results in Home Depot’s financial gains. I believe the lowering of the tax rates will increase disposable income, and boost consumer spending, directly again home depot and the economic growth and it should succeed in its intended goal of creating a higher standard of living.

The administration and its congressional allies are proposing to sharply reduce taxation of business income, primarily benefiting the small share of the population that owns the vast majority of corporate equity. President Trump said on Wednesday that the cuts would increase investment and spur growth, creating broader prosperity. But experts say the upside is limited, not least because the economy is already expanding.

Benjamin Franklin once said, “in this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.” Taxation has always been a hot-button issue in the United States, as it was one of the primary reasons the United States revolted from the British. The media have once again turned its attention to the issue of taxation, but primarily on the increasing of taxes solely on upper-class citizens. The United States currently employs a progressive tax rate, which means that the upper class already is liable for a higher percentage of taxes. During the current presidential campaign, each of the candidates has their own unique idea of tax reform. Some of the candidates’ tax plans cut taxes for all through the change to a flat tax rate, while other plans do quite the contrary and raise taxes for all. The candidates who are favoring the increase of taxes on the wealthy are attempting to enact laws, which increase funding for government programs, attempt to redistribute the wealth to the lower class, and eliminate the debt of the United States. However, the candidates who are attempting to enact a flat tax rate are attempting to eliminate outdated government programs and to help to increase jobs. A higher tax rate on the wealthy through a progressive tax system, at a cursory glance, may appear to be beneficial, however, I am arguing to show the negative effects not only for the wealthy but the United States economy as a whole.

usually go for a snack when they come on and the small print can be

It can change opinions because they have access to people and this gives it a lot of strength. This strength can either be used constructively by educating the people or it can be used destructively by misleading the innocent people. Power of the media can transform the whole society especially in the developing countries it can be used as a 'weapon of mass destruction'. But I think the most important use of media is to educate the people about the basic human rights. The dilemma of the developing countries is that people are not fully aware of their basic rights and if they know, they don't know about what to do and where to go. They don't know their collective strength. Even they don't know how to protest and what is the importance of