The Importance Of Ownership And Intangible Objects

Anywhere in the world, someone acquires something, whether it be money, a car, or even an idea. We can “own” many intangible and tangible items in life, but how does ownership relate to a sense and development of self? This question has been constantly answered for centuries through intelligent people like Plato, Aristotle, and Jean-Paul Sartre. However, the question has received no agreeable answer. In the end, people will agree that there is a strong and positive relationship between ownership and a sense of self because the things you own will define and develop who you are positively by exhibiting what you like, what you can and cannot do, and in the end, characterizes you, as long as you use the things you own properly.

The relationship between our identities and possessions remains on going. In fact, Joan Kron elaborates on that matter in her essay The Semiotics of Home Décor and mentions how we barely know what is actually beyond our home décor and possessions (74). Kron argues that our possessions and home décor grants us with various aims that cater to our human needs “Our possessions give us a sense of security and stability. They make us feel in control…we use things to compete.” (75). Also, Kron talks about status and how its vitality is depicted through our possessions. Something as simple as the price tag, the originality and rareness of the object and its competence can say something about our status. With this in mind, Kron asserts that “Some objects

The ability to have ownership over something, tangible or not, can give a person a sense of value or superiority when comparing themselves to others. Furthermore, as humans, it is easy to desire things as one’s own and claim it, but the way something is treated differs from person to person. As a result, the material items and skills a person has ownership over provides a glimpse of his or her’s true nature.

Twentieth-century philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre proposes that ownership extends beyond tangible objects; In Jean-Paul's view, becoming proficient in some skill and knowing something means that we "own" it. According to Sartre, I "own" the sport soccer because I chose to develop my skills as a soccer player, and now I play competitive travel soccer because I am skilled enough to compete with the other girls. I don't physically own this sport the way most people legally define ownership. I own soccer because I made it a part of me, it

Anywhere in the world, someone acquires something, whether it be money, a car, or even an idea. We can “own” many intangible and tangible items in life, but how does ownership relate to a sense of self? This question has been constantly answered for centuries through intelligent people like Plato, Aristotle, and Jean-Paul Sartre. However, the question has received no agreeable answer. In the end, people will agree that there is a strong and positive relationship between ownership and a sense of self because the things you own will define and develop who you are positively by exhibiting what you like, what you can and cannot do, and in the end, characterizes you, as long as you use the items you own properly.

Therefore, you have to take ownership of your own

Once you own something, don't you care more about it (just because it is yours). Think about it, if your friend has a new Xbox One you are still going to take care of it. But, if you own a new Xbox One, aren't you going to take care of it more carefully? Just because it is yours, you are going to be more careful and care about it a lot more. Owning something, takes control of who you are. The more you own, the more stressed out you are going to be, because you care about more things more

In the past, for instance, during the Colonial era in early America the ownership of certain objects defined status, but also it defined who you are as a person. If you lived in this era and you were in possession of then instantly you were treated with utmost respect simply because ownership represented wealth and wealth seemed to be directly related to status. And this concept that claims that the owning of goods/items defines character closely correlates to ideas and virtues in today's society. In my experience, the enormity of technology and the vastness of commercialism and the items that we buy for pure

Ownership exists between the tangible and the intangible; while owning objects often devolve into unhappiness and heighten a dangerous materialistic outlook, ownership of the intangible promotes and builds a concrete, upright moral character. The pursuit of tangible ownership inevitably leads to a precarious path of dissatisfaction and misery. While the attainment of material goods may have benefits, it quickly devolves into a twisted desire that spurs the growth of emotions such as greed; this appears mainly when the ownership of tangible items defines a person’s status and gives people a sense of worthiness. At this point, people define themselves with their possessions of the number of flashy cars and extravagant mansions they own rather than relying on their own personality.

What does it mean to own something? An individual may own something that has more significance to the item than meets the eye. This subject has encouraged prominent thinkers to learn more about the idea. This has entered a very fascinating way of thinking that has even perplexed the astounding minds of Plato, Aristotle, and Jean-Paul Sartre. This is why owning something has more significance than may be thought, tangible goods are detrimental to a person's character, ownership of tangible goods helps to develop moral character, and ownership extends beyond objects to include intangible things as well.

Now, let’s be honest. Kids living in this generation can’t stand not owning things that they want. That is not all that surprising as it can be proven through the essay, “The Tyranny of Things” by Woodbridge Morris. Woodbridge Morris proves the point that over consuming can lead to addiction and that addiction can change people’s everything. The author, Woodbridge Morris, builds an argument to persuade her readers that possessions are oppressive through examples, reasoning, and experiences.

Plato argues that owning objects is detrimental to a person's character. There are many different views as to how objects affect ones character. I do agree with Plato's point of view on this topic, by saying that with the things that a person owns, is how that certain person defines them self. I can say with my own experience that I have had objects in my life that almost have more control over my life than I do myself. A few of these things include; my car, my phone, and my basketball jersey.

Owning things, such as a car or a phone is a privilege that most people get without even realizing. However having the ownership of things also give u the responsibilities that follow. It’s painful to say but there are still many people that refer to themselves as the owners of their children and pets, which is a contradicting statement. In the worst cases, this dangerous feeling of ownership sometimes even leads to child abuse and violence. It’s an universal fact that parents should be responsible for their children until they become adults but does this give them the full ownership of their free willed children? Throughout the tragic play Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, many scenes showcase the inappropriate incidents of characters

Assessment of the Statement that Property is a Power Relationship Between People Property is the right to possess, enjoy or use a determinant thing, and includes the right of excluding others from doing the same. The concept of ownership or property has no single or widely accepted definition. Like any other concept it has great weight in public discourse and the popular usage varies broadly. Property is frequently conceived as a 'bundle of rights and obligations.' Property is stressed as not a relationship between people and things, but a relationship between people with regard to things.

People in todays society worry about owning something, to get what other people have, overtime destroying character. Some may get their possessions handed down to them and this is what decreases our values to work hard for something. Modern society is wealth driven to where as they do not want to work hard for that object, instead they want to have it given to them, they just want to the possession. Our moral values and characteristics decay when we start to think of ownership as a possession rather than valuing that item or going beyond only tangible objects. This relationship between ownership and the development of self identity ultimately is detrimental to a persons character because possession slowly turns to greed. Ownership to a person because a commonly used aspect and it takes over a person in being that persons greed turns to ambition. That person will end