The Importance Of Paying College Athletes

With debate on whether or not to compensate the college athletes in monetary terms due to the students’ sports talents help their various colleges to receive awards both rewards and cash money, it is important to look at criticisms of the National Collegiate Athletic Association with regards to the association’s advertisement deals of approximately more than a billion shillings profits yet no athlete is being compensated for his or her hard work. That according to Zimbalist (2013) is because the critiques are using the very developments to argue in favour of the payment of the student athletes since the opportunity for education and exposure to earn a professional contract is enough compensation since the cost of paying the student athletes would be too high.

Imagine being one of the best employees working for a billion dollar industry, but despite that, you aren’t paid. That is the reality for college athletes, who should be paid for their athletic ability. In the United States, four hundred thousand athletes are part of the NCAA. Yet, none of the athletes are paid. College athletes should be paid because they make the events possible, and those events generate billions of dollars in profit.

The money that players would be rewarded that would teach life skills and provide prosperity could easily be found in the NCAA. As of right now, the NCAA has an abundance of money that they are keeping to themselves and are turning the NCAA into a monopoly. Financial analyst Tom Gerencer confirms that the NCAA athletics make $12 billion a year. Some of this money is then distributed to universities around the country to fund athletic programs and pay coaches and other staff members. The money that the NCAA does not give out is taken in as a profit for that year which is usually around $1 million. None of this large sum of money is given to players as compensation for participating in their sport (Gerencer). The NCAA was invented to benefit

The American dream of making a living in sports at both the collegiate and professional level grows each year. The youth of today’s society strive to join the ranks of the professional athletes they worship, and college is the beginning of that dream. Over the past few decades, college athletics have gained immense popularity across universities in the United States. Intercollegiate sports bring in a surplus of revenue to their respective universities as well as build a reputation for the college. Athletes attending Division I sports go to their particular schools in hopes of fulfilling their dream of making it professionally. There is a long-debated argument on whether college athletes at the Division I level should be paid to attend school

This scholarly article by Debra Blum attempts to legitimize the argument that athletes should be compensated for their hard work from the perspective of former Duke University player Dick DeVenzio. It describes his struggle in day to day life and shows that players need to receive compensation to survive. This source provides primary source evidence for my argument.

There are conversations about how football and basketball players should be paid, that’s the basis of pay-for-play, but if you pay the boys you have to pay the girls as stated in title XI. If things aren’t as equal as possible the NCAA simply wont allow it. They would have lawsuit after lawsuit if colleges weren’t able to spread the wealth to everyone, man or woman it has to be equal. It’s that simple.

The industry of collegiate sports is a billion dollar business. Each year the biggest, most popular colleges receive massive amounts of money from hundreds of the most popular names and companies. It is highly overlooked that the profits being made is all in part to the elite performances of their top athletes. With it being absolutely no secret that these players never receive even a penny of these earnings. A majority of the best athletes are playing with a full-ride scholarship in their back pocket, so people automatically think that that alone should be more than enough to get them through college and be satisfied. But as time goes on and the idea of presenting pay to these young adults becomes more and more talked about, it is considered

Due to National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) rules and regulations no college athlete is able to receive any compensation or endorsement while participating in college athletics. These rules have long been challenged, however, the NCAA does not make any changes. With universities grossing close to $200 million a year, college athletics has turned into one of the top industries in the world. The NCAA, a governing body of college athletics, currently holds all power in college athletics. Without people questioning the NCAA and demanding changes to the monopoly that the NCAA holds nothing will happen to the unfairness to college athletes in college sports today. College athletes deserve to receive compensation in some way for the

Money is a big part of the issue when it comes to paying athletes in college. If schools were allowed to pay athletes for playing at their school, then you would be signing the death certificated of those schools that do not generate as much money as the larger schools. Smaller schools would not be able to compete with larger schools simply because they could never make the same big time offers as the larger schools. All of the best players would go to the same schools because they all want the most money, but who could blame them? If you had to choose between a larger salary and a smaller one, chances are that you would choose the larger salary. Large schools can offer much more money than the smaller schools can and for that reason, small schools athletic departments would never be able to compete.

Majority of college football or basketball teams bring in enough money to support many student clubs and programs. Even though they bring enough for these programs and enough for themselves, what about the other teams that don’t bring in any money at all. Teams like lacrosse , golf or swimming might not earn as much revenue to support themselves and using money the bigger teams bring to give to them would not be fair Splitting money between all the teams would be hard because there is not a fair way you could spilt it. Many teams earn way more money than the others. Hruby reported that, “NCAA pocketed an astonishing $771 million in television money for its just-completed men's basketball tournament.”(Hruby) The NCAA men’s basketball tournament

My stance is that collage athletes should be paid to play sports. My reasoning for wanting these college athletes to get paid is because they aren't allowed to have a job while playing a college sport. Think of all the things they need, food, clothes, school materials, and possibly money to pay for their housing. You can make the argument that college student on scholarship have their education and a lot of times housing is paid for by the college. While that may be true for some college athletes, not all college athletes having their housing provided for them. Even still, we can all agree there is more daily expenses incurred in our day to day living. Not allowing college students to get payed is making it hard for them.

Millions of people watch sports every day. College Sports are very important to society and college players should not get paid. Growing up it is every athletes dream to make money playing the sport they love. That's what professional sports are for. College is for learning. If college players receive money then they wouldn't play as good. The NCAA tournament wouldn't be as exciting as it is, and there would be fewer viewers.

The NCAA is a multi-billion dollar industry that generated over $845 billion last year due to their players’ ability to entertain and perform to their fullest extent at all times. So with all of this money flowing in, why wouldn’t they provide their athletes a stipend? Well that’s a question that today baffles many. What they basically have in place is a corporation that makes tons of money and, oh yeah, they don’t have to pay their employees. Sounds like the perfect business model right? What has continued to be one of the most pressing issues in the world of sports today has now become a matter the NCAA can no longer afford to ignore. The service that college athletes provide to the institutions they attend in addition to millions of spectators all over the world is still not being rewarded in the manner that it should be for their above-average dedication, work ethic, and most importantly money brought in to their employer.

Now and days people are starting to consider paying college athletes but that may not be the best idea. College athletes should not be paid because universities are already paying for education and scholarships which should already be enough, also there is no fair way to pay athletes, and playing in a colligate sport should be a privilege.

One of the most widely debated and discussed issues in the world of college sports, has been whether or not to pay National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I (NCAA DI) student-athletes. There would be many effects on the college sports world if the decision was made to pay them, but those effects may pale in comparison to what is currently happening to the student-athletes.