The Importance Of Paying College Athletes To Be Paid

Top collegiate athletes should be able to get paid. Schools are making millions in ticket sales, selling jerseys and other venues that help out of school. However, college athletes make all the money for the college. College athletes should deserve to to get paid. “The college sports industry generates $11 Billion in annual revenues.”(Text 1, line 1) the college sports industry generates so much money, that they need to share the money and that it's selfish. Scholarship athletes should be getting paid.

College athletics is a very diverse organization involving a lot of students, mainly as the players, and non-students such as officials, coaches and others. The leading governing body for college athletics is the National Collegiate Athletic Association, NCAA. College sports is itself a big industry involving sponsorships, TV networks, endorsements, retail products and marketing. But in spite of it being a big business, the players are not compensated for the work they deliver. This opens up two opinions: should players be paid, or should they not? Kristi Dosh’s article, “The Problems With Paying College Athletes”, (UNCLEAR)discusses where the coaches’ money come from to pay student athletes. On the other hand, Mark Cassell’s article, “College Athletes Should Be Able To Negotiate Compensation”, debates how athletes should be able to negotiate their compensation. This paper will evaluate the evidence of both Dosh and Cassell in order to determine which argument is more effective.

In the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia’s definition of “Amateur” it states, during the early 20th century “the American intercollegiate athletic system… adopted amateurism, claiming it developed competitors who were morally superior to professionals” (“Amateur”). Amateurism is the concept that athletes should compete without payment. Until recently, playing collegiate sports as an amateur was thought to be a noble calling. As time surpassed, college sports became a commercialized industry, generating billions of dollars in revenue. When this became apparent, the implementation of athletic scholarships became more relevant. The athletic scholarship seemed to be a more than fair way to delight athletes with some sort of incentive to ensure

When providing a service, people get paid for the service, so why are college athletes not paid for performing a service with their athletic abilities? Almost anyone who is involved with sports, whether it be watching them or playing them, has an opinion on whether or not college athletes should be paid. My opinion on this controversy is that college athletes should be paid. College sports make billions of dollars, so there is definitely room for athletes to payed in some way. There are three main reasons as to why I believe college athletes should be paid. One is the athletes do not have enough time to hold a steady job because they are constantly practicing or playing the sport they are involved in. If they can work there are rules as to what they can make. The second reason is the colleges the athletes play for and the NCAA both make money off all of the athletes’ names and the coaches of the athletes are paid very well. The last reason is the scholarships of some athletes can be taken away if they do not meet the performance standards of the college they play for.

Good morning ladies and gentlemen, and thank you all for being here today. I humbly express my gratitude for your interest in the topic of paying college athletes. As I have previously stated, I am standing against this change for this topic and you should too.

Money is a big part of the issue when it comes to paying athletes in college. If schools were allowed to pay athletes for playing at their school, then you would be signing the death certificated of those schools that do not generate as much money as the larger schools. Smaller schools would not be able to compete with larger schools simply because they could never make the same big time offers as the larger schools. All of the best players would go to the same schools because they all want the most money, but who could blame them? If you had to choose between a larger salary and a smaller one, chances are that you would choose the larger salary. Large schools can offer much more money than the smaller schools can and for that reason, small schools athletic departments would never be able to compete.

One of the most important choices a person if given throughout their life is the choice of what college to go to and what to study. Few people are gifted with athletic talents that allow them to receive an athletic scholarship to pay for their college expenses. When it comes to the issue of whether a college athlete should be paid one can see that the players are being cheated out but the NCAA. The NCAA could very easily incorporate a system in which the athletes could earn a salary while playing their sport which earns their school money.

Paying college athletes can have a lot of positive effects, it can teach these young athletes how to handle money, it gives them some form of income especially if some of the athletes do not have job, during the football/ basketball season etc. And they can kind of see what it will be like in the pros as far as being paid to play, I’m not saying pay them like the pros like $5,000 a game but I’m saying like pay them $100 a game, just something, and a lot of people will say isn’t a scholarship enough, well sometimes it’s not. Most athletic scholarships only cover a portion of the cost and you are supposed to cover the rest on your own. And if you don’t have a job during the season or your barley are able to work, it can be hard for athletes to make ends meet obviously. Like in the case of this basketball player Shabazz Napier stated, "I don't feel student-athletes should get hundreds of thousands of dollars, but like I said, there are hungry nights that I go to bed and I'm starving,". I mean there are players that are really struggling just to be able to eat, and colleges want these same athletes to be at their very best at all times, but how can they, when they cannot even meet their own nutritional needs.

Another major argument used to support paying college athletes is to say college athletics is a large business. Supporters say that college athletes should be paid because the extremely large organization known as the NCAA is making lucrative amounts of money off of them, and what they do is considered a business (Frederick, 2013). They argue that the extreme amounts of money the NCAA earns from these athletes is too much, and that they can afford to compensate the athletes for the large amount of money they generate. College athletes sign a letter of intent to play for a specific university knowing that the school will generate large amounts of money off of their appearance, and performance. If college athletes do not agree with the fact that universities and the NCAA will make large sums of money from them they should not play

Here are some statements from former players and officials on college athletes getting paid. These are some current players commenting on if college athletes should be paid or not. Current Seattle Seahawks cornerback (Richard Sherman) makes a big statement and impact on this argument. He says “No, I don’t think college athletes are given enough time to really take advantage of the free education that they’re given, and it’s frustrating because a lot of people get upset with student-athletes and say they’re not focused on school and they’re not taking advantage of the opportunity they’re given. They should get paid. I would love for a regular student to have a student-athlete’s schedule during the season for just one quarter or one semester and show me

Over the last few years college sports have gained immense popularity. Therefore college sports have generate millions of dollars for the NCAA and the university's. The players for the universities aren’t getting a cent of these profits. Hence why the NCAA should allow athletes to get a salary for their participation in sports. Others think that the athletes don’t deserve to be paid because of their scholarships.

College athletes demonstrate a high quality of balance, between school work, work they put on the field, and managing a personal life as well. Athletic scholars are people who work as hard or if not harder than an average american works in his/her profession and should be paid for it! My view on this topic is that if you truly work in the classroom, have the grades, work on the field and show that you deserve to represent the university in which you’re attending, then you deserve a share of the money collected from the multi billion dollar association the NCAA. Most athletes that earn a scholarship get about 25,000 dollars a year. According to Forbes athletes are given about 7 dollars for a meal when traveling and anything more given is

The money that players would be rewarded that would teach life skills and provide prosperity could easily be found in the NCAA. As of right now, the NCAA has an abundance of money that they are keeping to themselves and are turning the NCAA into a monopoly. Financial analyst Tom Gerencer confirms that the NCAA athletics make $12 billion a year. Some of this money is then distributed to universities around the country to fund athletic programs and pay coaches and other staff members. The money that the NCAA does not give out is taken in as a profit for that year which is usually around $1 million. None of this large sum of money is given to players as compensation for participating in their sport (Gerencer). The NCAA was invented to benefit

There are conversations about how football and basketball players should be paid, that’s the basis of pay-for-play, but if you pay the boys you have to pay the girls as stated in title XI. If things aren’t as equal as possible the NCAA simply wont allow it. They would have lawsuit after lawsuit if colleges weren’t able to spread the wealth to everyone, man or woman it has to be equal. It’s that simple.

Do you often go to college football or basketball games? In his article “NCAA Schools Can Absolutely Afford To Pay College Athletes, Economists Say” Strachan believes that colleges should pay their athletes because they deserve to be paid. Strachan believes this because as economists say most if not all institutions can afford it, “But when it comes to whether the NCAA…. can afford it, the answer appears to be… yes”(par 27). According to Strachan, “They’re nonprofits, and their incentive is to spend every cent that comes in”(par 9), if they have extra money they should just give it to the players, for bringing the college even more publicity and money. In Strachan’s view, it “shouldn’t be surprising”(par 27) that we have enough money to pay