The Importance Of Paying Student Athletes Get Paid

Top collegiate athletes should be able to get paid. Schools are making millions in ticket sales, selling jerseys and other venues that help out of school. However, college athletes make all the money for the college. College athletes should deserve to to get paid. “The college sports industry generates $11 Billion in annual revenues.”(Text 1, line 1) the college sports industry generates so much money, that they need to share the money and that it's selfish. Scholarship athletes should be getting paid.

Whether college athletes should or should not get paid has been a controversial topic throughout the Collegiate Athletic Association for many years now. According to the article “My Priceless Opportunity” by Bill Walton , he believes that NCAA student athletes should not get paid because “the players entering the game know the rules going in and that they have been given a chance to make something of their lives in exchange for the privilege of being a student athlete”. Others like Michael Wilbon, author of “As Colleges’ Greed Grows, So Does the Hypocrisy”, thinks student athletes should get paid due to their hard work and labor. While I respect and admire the diligent task of being both a student and an athlete, I strongly agree with Bill Walton and the many others who support college athletes not being paid.

The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) was founded on March 31, 1906. It was founded by Theodore Roosevelt. Its headquarters are in Indianapolis, Indiana (www.wikipedia.org). The mission of the NCAA is to “be an integral part of higher education and to focus on the development of our student-athletes” (ncaa.org). The first inter-collegiate sports began in 1852 when

Furthermore, paying student athletes would alter the principles of collegiate sports. As before stated, college sports were believed to develop “competitors who were morally superior to professionals” (“Amateur”). Playing college sports, as an amateur, has long been regarded as a huge opportunity for the student athlete. It offers an athlete the chance to compete at a higher level of competition, while at the same time receiving a college education. For example, the article “For the Love of the Game” discusses athletes competing at Division II and Division III collegiate levels. He explains the situations of just a few individuals who currently compete for schools while receiving no little to no benefits. The athletes pay their way through school, yet they are nothing less than grateful to have the opportunity to compete in collegiate sports (Shipnuck 1). But more than ever, student athletes are making crucial decisions based upon money. A payment system would only intensify the student athlete’s urge to make decisions based upon money-luxuries. The student athlete’s motivation to compete in collegiate athletics would drastically change. Paying athletes would create an incentive for athletes to attend college for athletics rather than to receive an education. The student athlete would now be

The NCAA is one of the largest sports organizations in the world, representing college athletics through three divisions and over twenty different sports. It is a multi billion dollar business that brings in revenue through ticket sales, television contracts, and sale of memorabilia. However, with none of the profits going towards the athletes themselves, the NCAA is using their students for personal gain within the organization. There are multiple ways the NCAA profits off its athletes, by undervaluing players and giving them less compensation because of it, as well as limiting their opportunities to make money on their own.

For years there has been a debate whether college athletes should be paid for playing for their university in the NCAA. The NCAA basketball tournament known as March Madness, is a tournament that generates billions of dollars in revenue every year and the student athletes receive no payment for playing and generating their schools

The NCAA is an organization, founded by Theodore Roosevelt in 1906, led by a group of board members who’s goal is to have college players succeed both athletically and scholarly; coined the term ‘student athlete.’ The sport of football was having many problems in the late 1800’s/early 1900’s and President Roosevelt said, “reform the game or it will be abolished.” Thus, the birth of the NCAA was formed and rules were set to make the game safer to the athletes. The NCAA currently has three different divisions: Division I, Division II, and Division III. Each division has its own set of rules on what restrictions are placed. Division I is said to be the most competitive division where the top talent goes and where a lot of professional teams pull from. The NCAA is the main headline for all college sporting events and “runs the show” telling what people can, and cannot, do. The

The issue of pay or no pay goes beyond athletic or academic scholarships. The money would be used for additional pay completely separate from the costs the school covers for the athlete already. Just as professional athletes receive a paycheck for the efforts they put in, so would student-athletes. The NCAA has opposed this idea since it came into existence. All officials of the Association believe that college sports should, “preserve the status of amateur athletics” (Mondello & Beckham, 2002), and

The NCAA is a multi-billion dollar industry that generated over $845 billion last year due to their players’ ability to entertain and perform to their fullest extent at all times. So with all of this money flowing in, why wouldn’t they provide their athletes a stipend? Well that’s a question that today baffles many. What they basically have in place is a corporation that makes tons of money and, oh yeah, they don’t have to pay their employees. Sounds like the perfect business model right? What has continued to be one of the most pressing issues in the world of sports today has now become a matter the NCAA can no longer afford to ignore. The service that college athletes provide to the institutions they attend in addition to millions of spectators all over the world is still not being rewarded in the manner that it should be for their above-average dedication, work ethic, and most importantly money brought in to their employer.

The colleges could use that money to help improve their campuses. Colleges would be able to renovate and upgrade their gyms, classrooms, or dorms. By doing this, more people and students would be attracted to that school and want to go there. If they paid the athletes, then they would not have the opportunity to upgrade their standards. Also, the colleges could use that money towards the scholarships. Many students are unable to afford all of the money and tuition that comes with schooling, so when they offer scholarships, they bring in more students. More students equal higher popularity, and more popularity equals more success for the school. Another reason why college should get the money over athletes is that it could go towards the athletic directors and the staff of the athletic programs. That pay will ensure that the directors are doing their best and making the right decisions to help their teams progress positively. By bringing in the most talented players, the team has a better chance of winning games. Overall, the money would help the colleges gain an advantage over others and give them more opportunities than if they paid the

Money is a big part of the issue when it comes to paying athletes in college. If schools were allowed to pay athletes for playing at their school, then you would be signing the death certificated of those schools that do not generate as much money as the larger schools. Smaller schools would not be able to compete with larger schools simply because they could never make the same big time offers as the larger schools. All of the best players would go to the same schools because they all want the most money, but who could blame them? If you had to choose between a larger salary and a smaller one, chances are that you would choose the larger salary. Large schools can offer much more money than the smaller schools can and for that reason, small schools athletic departments would never be able to compete.

Most American people like sports. College Sports have been growing up every year and universities and athletes are more competitive every year. The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) was founded in 1906 to protect young people from the dangerous and exploitive athletics practices of the time and continues to implement that principle with increased emphasis on both athletics and academic excellence (NCAA 2012). The NCAA make and apply the rules in college sports. One of the most pressing issues in Today’s sport world is if College athletes should be paid. Sports such as baseball, football and basketball generate giant amounts of revenue every year and has become the NCAA in a multi-billion

What would make a college athlete eligible to receive payment for playing any sport? Would they have to play a sport that brings in plenty of revenue to the school? I conducted a survey asking several people around campus the same question, “Do you think college athletes should be paid for their performances?” Some of the interviewees said yes, because network and advertisements profit from them, the threatening conditions their bodies endure, and the amount of time and energy it takes to be a student-athlete. Some interviewees said no, because it is not their career and the athlete chose to play the sport, most athletes are already being compensated for their performances, and a lot of athletes receive an enormous amount in refund, so

With all that comes with being a college athlete, it should be a requirement for them to get paid. Cultural interaction is represented in the U.S through college athletes. These athletes dedicate majority of their time during the day to either practicing or getting prepared to play in the next game. In the article “Here’s the Insane Amount of Time Student Athletes Spend on Practice”, it talks about how much time on an average that student athletes spend during practice. Author Peter Jacobs says that “Collegiate student-athletes may spend more than 40 hours a week practicing, leaving little time to keep up with academic commitments,

We all have our favorite college athletes, like Baker Mayfield and all his great accomplishments. He’s one of the bigger names in college football, but what about the less known college athletes with the same great accomplishments. Don’t you think they should be treated equal? Well, that is a reason why college athletes are not paid, because you cannot just pay the bigger college athlete, this is also why they do not get paid because there is so many of them and it is hard to pay them all. College athletes should not be paid.