The Importance Of Space Exploration

As humans, we are born with a natural desire to learn and discover. With space exploration, we are able to do just that. In an online essay called “Is Space Exploration Worth the Cost”, Dr. Joan Vernikos,

Three main clusters that are developed under this idea of space exploration is the benefits that are gained, ethical code and what it means with regard to the future of the human race. In this paper I will talk about what major projects are being worked on and who will benefit from these. This will also include what laws of space are and ethical code. This will also identify the differing viewpoints on space exploration and whether the big picture is worth the small steps being taken as to advancements in space technology and sciences.

It is the year of 2050; earth’s resources are dwindling. As the population increases, society is panicking as to how they are supposed to survive on earth, being that their pure existence has consumed almost all of the necessities to live on the planet. Now the question is, what do they do now? We have been in search of a habitable planet to live on. Robotic missions will be key to researching, gathering data, and figuring out if life on another planet is a plausible option. Radiation exposure and the weather in space are big concerns as to if the human race will be able to even establish planet that is safe to inhabit. Will the human race survive?

Human space exploration is an exciting thing, but there is no need to rush into it. It is true that humans are a lot more reactive than robots; humans are able to make quick decisions in a couple of seconds vs. a robot that needs to send signals down to Earth which can take up to 15 minutes to receive (Mann, 2017). A robot can not react in the same way a human does, but there is an ethical benefit to this. Lives of humans are not being endangered and there is not as much as an emotional attachment to the robots. Robots are expendable machines

Space. Possibly the most unforgiving place possible for humans, and yet we desire to go there. We desire to travel to distant planets, new galaxies, and to know all that there is to know. We want all of this, and yet the mission to mars, and the first missions to the moon, we sent robots. There are many reasons for this and why we didn’t send humans, but the main reason we haven’t sent as many humans to space, is cost. It is extremely expensive to travel to space. So, robots are just cheaper. However, we want to send humans. We want to explore space ourselves. Therefor to accomplish our goals of sending humans into space, we need to make it cheaper to go to space.

As humans, we always push to explore for new discoveries, it is in our blood to explore and push scientific boundaries. Space exploration has allowed us to expand our technology, foster a curiosity in humans, discover new worlds, and most importantly push even further to discover life in a new planet. With the advancement of new technology and innovators, there has been a significant discussion whether sending humans with the support of robots is the most efficient method. However, there are great arguments made that sending exclusively robots on space exploration is the best strategy. There is

One of the biggest misconceptions of NASA is the idea of a homogeneous organization. NASA is, in fact, a conglomeration of different groups with various aims. Sometimes these groups can be at odds with each other over various organizational resources. The nature of space operations split these groups within NASA into two general categories: the “Human Destiny” camp with human spaceflight and colonization of space as the ultimate goal and the “Science in Space” camp focused on using robotic spaceflight to perform space science.

Nasa’s mission to send humans to the planet Mars is too dangerous, cost way too much, and is inefficient. In the near future, (late 2020’s) Nasa plans to lift off a rocket with humans on it and travel millions of miles to the curious planet of Mars to get data on whether there is life on Mars. Nasa has sent robots to the red planet before, and have got great data, there has even been sightings of water on Mars, and in the near future Nasa wants to have humans live on the planet. The problem with that is, that it’s way too expensive, and dangerouse. They could solve both of those problems by sending robots too mars. Robots will get way more data than a human can, and travel way further.

Time and time again has it been proven that the best means of advancing the world is through the education and inspiration of young people. This is a crucial part and a high priority of NASA in particular and has led to the development of many programs for students across America to be inspired and become prepared for the next generation of space exploration. Specifically, the FIRST Robotics Competition, the DIME Competition, and the NASA Human Exploration Rover Challenge are all programs designed to harbor the curiosity and wonder that those of the younger generation possess in the field of space exploration. Consequently, a force of future scientists, engineers, and, of course, astronauts is developed to pursue space exploration for years to come.

The argument states that investing the appropriate resources in unmanned space flight will lead to more successful result for gathering information compared to manned space flight.The argument in its current form is weak and unconvincing.The conclusion of the argument is supported by unwarranted assumptions.

As humans, a necessary part of our psyche is exploration. However, numerous trials are confronted when it comes to space exploration. While it remains vital that humans explore this great expansion, one must consider the issues that occur. After all, what is more important, space exploration, or our continued existence?

and scientific power. For example, “robot satellites in earth orbit have revolutionalized global communications and navigation, and they have yielded fundamental advances in our understanding of the atmosphere, the oceans, the weather, and the distribution of natural resources” on earth (Van Allen). Although space exploration is costly, the U.S. has gained an abundance of knowledge about planet Earth and space science. Independent space technologies, such as rovers and satellites, are flexible, proven to be highly productive in missions to outer space; these technologies are also less expensive to launch than shuttles for human space travel (Van Allen).

A few decades ago, going to the space seemed impossible to man but after many technological advances, man found a way to get to the space. NASA, NASA primary has improved its space mission shuttles and on each one, they were getting better and gaining confidence about sending shuttles to outer space until the thirteenth mission to space, also known as the “Successful Failure,” made them realize that going to space is a risk, even with the most advanced technology.

Although some may be troubled by the idea of NASA eliminating its current manned space program, the benefits are likely to become more apparent in time. By focusing on the future of space travel, NASA will be able to develop programs

It can be said that knowing there is a back-up plan, which in this case would be the human operator in the space flight, allows for some room for error in the programming and development of the equipment. When there is no back-up plan, and nobody to correct malfunctioning equipment, more attention is paid to repeated trials and improvements, in order to ensure that the machines can correct themselves.