The Importance Of The Electoral College

Though our founding fathers created the Electoral College over 200 years ago, it has been changed with time to accommodate modern needs and is still an important and necessary part of our electoral system. The Electoral College ensures political stability in our nation by encouraging the two-party system and also protects the interests of minorities. Furthermore, the Electoral College helps maintain a united country by requiring widespread popular support of a candidate in order for him or her to become president.

To conclude, the Electoral College does not give power to the third-parties. Because the House and Senate pretty much revolve around the two-party system, the representation given to third-parties makes it nearly impossible to win the outcome of the election. In the case of a given third-party winning over a state, maybe the party would affect the outcome of the candidate’s runs. However, seeing it as it has been established over time, the winning of an election by a third-party is highly unlikely.

Although no third-party candidate has ever won a U.S. presidential election, I disagree that a third party candidate has only slightly affected the elections. Third-party candidates rarely win elections, but they can split parties. That can affect the outcome of an election when a third-party candidate is especially strong, or when the race between the two other candidates is especially close. Third-party candidates exert influence by focusing the election on particular issues and taking votes away from major candidates. During the 2000, election, Green Party presidential candidate Ralph Nader took votes away from Democrat Al Gore, thus contributing to the loss to George Bush. The most successful of the third parties in any one election was

Nevertheless, the democrat would most likely get those votes because, as always, he is one of the two main parties in voting. I really don’t want a third party because of that, and I don’t want to get confused when I vote. Also, I don’t want to deal with listening to a third party when the third party most likely will not win the election, so we need to just stick with the two-party system, but, still let the third party have a voice, but not a vote on the presidential job.

When the Constitutional Convention gathered in 1784 they had the difficult task of determining how our government should be assembled and what systems we should use to elect them. They quickly decided congress should have the powers to pass laws and the people should elect these people to ensure they are following the will of the people. But who should elect the president?

In this week’s discussion we talked about if the Electoral College and if it is important or not in our country today. Do we really need to have the Electoral College? I believe it is important in our country today and I believe we should try to keep it in our country for as long as we can.

The electoral college makes a huge impact on the U.S, despite Americans knowing little to nothing about it. What people don’t know is, the electoral college is an out of date burden on the country. Things such as the history, the negative effects on American minorities, and effective alternative.

The Electoral College is responsible in aiding the protection of the nation’s two-party system. As explained by Tara Ross in Anthony Taylors article “Making A Case for the Electoral College” “The electorate would splinter its votes among many candidates. Multi-candidates’ presidential races would result in constant recounts, uncertainty, and consistent runoffs. While the Republican and Democratic party don’t necessarily prevent the election of a third party, they certainly do aid in the lack of third party presidential nominees and selectants. While this is the case, many Americans are beginning to turn to the idea of a third-party candidate. Such as Jeffrey Jones findings in his online news article featured in Gallup “Americans Continue to Say a Third Political Party Is Needed” he found that “Americans' current desire for a third party is consistent with their generally negative views of both the Republican and Democratic parties, with only about four in 10 viewing each positively. Americans' views toward the two major parties have been tepid for much of the last decade. However,

The 2000 presidential election was a major eye opener for many people. As it appeared to also be the dismay of many, the candidate who won the most popular votes nationwide actually lost the contest. In the election's risen moment, popular attention centered around the Electoral College and its role in the presidential election. Under the U.S. Constitution, the people did not necessarily direct vote for the President in a nationwide election; rather, the people in each state would vote for electors from that state, who in turn would cast the constitutionally decisive votes for President and Vice President. Moreover, not only is the people's influence indirect, the Electoral College's voting pattern does not necessarily track the national popular

Presidential elections in the United States are commonly unfair. One might think that the presidential candidate who receives the majority popular vote would be elected president. This is not always true, because of the Electoral College, which is a “winner-take-all” system. Ever since the election of 1824, when Andrew Jackson ran against John Quincy Adams who did not win the popular vote and was elected into office because of the Electoral College, many other candidates have been cheated out of winning. The Electoral College should not stand any longer because in many elections it has prevented the candidate that the majority of the citizens voted for from winning. It would be difficult if there were to be tie in the Electoral

The Electoral College is a process, not a place of schooling. The Electoral College is responsible for electing who will be our next president of the United States by compromising between electing the president by vote and electing the president by popular vote of qualified citizens. The electoral College should be abolished because it is an unfair and unnecessary way to choose the president. Each candidate earns points by winning individual states. Each state is worth a different amount of points based on population, added with the number of senators. There are 538 electors within the college. People are finding it a challenge to decide if the Electoral College should be changed or abolished. If it were up to me, it would be abolished, because if the president wins the popular vote, they get the majority of the citizens votes. This system is unfair because each state has a different number population, so each has a different amount of points. When I am eligible to vote, I want to be able to vote for who I want, the majority of my state’s population should not be able to decide. The Electoral College may be

Third parties have a large disadvantage in the Electoral College system. Most states allot their Electoral Votes that favor a tow-party system. Even if a third party candidate receives a large amount of vote they still may not receive even on Electoral vote. This actually happened in 1992 when Ross Perot won 18% of the popular vote but did not win any Electoral votes.

While campaigning, one candidate may win the popular vote but end up loosing the electoral vote and therefore the entire election. This is because of the electoral college. During a campaign, one candidate may win the popular vote by a mile. However, it all comes down to the states that they win. Some states, like Texas, California, Florida, and New York, have many votes in the electoral college. Others, like Wyoming, North Dakota, and Alaska, have the absolute minimum. The states that each candidate wins will determine the number of votes they get from the electoral college. One candidate could win a majority of the US but the other could still win if they just get the states with more electoral votes to be on their side. When it comes down

College is the way to win the presidency, this means that you can lose the popular vote which are votes from the people, but you can still become president if you win the Electoral votes. This happened to George W. Bush in 2000 when he was running for president, he lost 47.87% to 48.38% but had an Electoral vote of 271 granting him the presidency and returning for second time.

In recorded history there have been five instances where the United States has elected a President that did not achieve the office by popular vote, rather these politicians were elected by the system that our founding fathers enacted known as the Electoral College. This system was made to protect the people, and never to confront the very democracy that makes America the great country we all know and love. The Electoral College in recent years, has not lived up to the expectations that the Founding Fathers once wrote in the constitution. Because of the problems that have arisen, many believe that abrogating the Electoral College will not only benefit the American citizens, but as well as the government as a whole.